滑动测微管抗渗能力的测试装置及试验研究

doi:10.16285/j.rsm.2019.1500

岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (7): 2504-2515.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.1500

• 测试技术 • 上一篇

滑动测微管抗渗能力的测试装置及试验研究

刘争宏^{1, 2, 3}，张龙^{2, 3}，郑建国^{2, 3}，张炜^{2, 3}，于永堂^{2, 3}

1. 长安大学地质工程与测绘学院，陕西西安 710054；2. 机械工业勘察设计研究院有限公司，陕西西安710043； 3. 陕西省特殊岩土与处理重点实验室，陕西西安 710043

收稿日期:2019-09-02 修回日期:2019-12-16 出版日期:2020-07-10 发布日期:2020-09-20
作者简介:刘争宏，男，1980年生，博士研究生，教授级高级工程师，主要从事特殊土相关的工程实践与研究。
基金资助:
陕西省科技统筹创新工程计划项目（No. 2016KTZDSF04-05-01）；陕西省重大科技成果转化引导专项项目（No. 2015KTCG01-08）；中国机械设备工程股份有限公司科技研发基金支持项目（No. CMEC-KJYF-2016-06）。

Testing device and experimental study on anti-seepage ability of sliding micrometer tube

LIU Zheng-hong^{1, 2, 3}, ZHANG Long^{2, 3}, ZHENG Jian-guo^{2, 3}, ZHANG Wei^{2, 3}, YU Yong-tang^{2, 3}

1. College of Geological Engineering and Geomatics, Chang’an University, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710054, China; 2. China JK Institute of Engineering Investigation and Design Co. Ltd., Xi’an, Shaanxi 710043, China; 3. Shaanxi Key Laboratory for the Property and Treatment of Special Soil and Rock, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710043, China

Received:2019-09-02 Revised:2019-12-16 Online:2020-07-10 Published:2020-09-20
Supported by:
This work was supported by the Science and Technology Overall Innovation Project of Shaanxi Province (2016KTZDSF04-05-01), the Transformation and Guidance of Major Scientific and Technological Achievements Project of Shaanxi Province (2015KTCG01-08) and the Science and Technology R & D Fund Project of China Mechanical Engineering Corporation (CMEC-KJYF-2016-06).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 使用滑动测微技术进行桩身内力测试，测管安装时的防渗处理是该技术实现高质量测试的关键，已有处理措施鲜有其防渗效果的定量研究。研发了一套滑动测微管抗渗能力测试装置，对3种常用防渗处理措施不同压差下的渗流量进行了测定，得到计算渗流量的公式，结合现场条件分析了测管安装的注意事项。结果表明，测管内压力大时的渗流量要远大于测管外压力大时的渗流量；涂胶是一种效果非常好的防渗措施，采用该措施后一般不会有超过0.005 mm粒径的颗粒进入测管；增加测管内水头有利于减少杂质进入测管，但测管内水头不能高出桩孔内液面太多；灌注混凝土后，若测管内有水溢出应封闭测管限制水的溢出，若测管内水位下降，则应开放测管允许气体进入测管。

关键词: 滑动测微计, 桩基础, 内力测试, 防渗措施

Abstract: It is a way to measure the internal force of pile foundation by sliding micrometer, and the anti-seepage measures during the installation of sliding micrometer tube are the key to achieve high quality test, while quantitative research on anti-seepage effect of measures is rare. A set of device for testing the anti-seepage ability of sliding micrometer tube was developed. The seepage flow of three common anti-seepage measures under different pressure differences was tested, and a formula for calculating the seepage flow was developed. The matters needing attention in the installation of the sliding micrometer tube were analyzed according to the site conditions. Test results show that when the internal pressure is higher than the external pressure, the seepage flow rate is much larger than that when the external pressure is larger than the internal pressure. Glue coating is a very effective anti-seepage measure, and generally no particles with a diameter over 0.005 mm will enter the sliding micrometer tube after adopting this measure. Increasing the water head in the sliding micrometer tube is beneficial to reduce impurities entering it, but the water head in the sliding micrometer tube can not be too much higher than the liquid levels in the borehole of the pile. After pouring concrete, if water overflow in the sliding micrometer tube happens, the orifice of the sliding micrometer tube should be closed to limit water overflow, and if the water level in the sliding micrometer tube falls, the orifice of the sliding micrometer tube should be opened to allow gas to enter it.

Key words: sliding micrometer, pile, stress test, anti-seepage measure

中图分类号: TU 473.1

刘争宏, 张龙, 郑建国, 张炜, 于永堂, . 滑动测微管抗渗能力的测试装置及试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2504-2515.

LIU Zheng-hong, ZHANG Long, ZHENG Jian-guo, ZHANG Wei, YU Yong-tang, . Testing device and experimental study on anti-seepage ability of sliding micrometer tube[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(7): 2504-2515.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	杨明辉, 蔡明辉, 陈波, 杨汉, . 考虑波致海床动态响应的单桩水平阻抗计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1563-1572.
[2]	周光远, 干飞, 郑刚, 周海祚, 王宏, 毕靖, 刘彪, 张元胤, . 基于土体变形的端承桩负摩阻力计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 930-942.
[3]	田雷, 谢强, 段军, 陶富涛, 班宇鑫, 傅翔, 晏彬淇, . 三向斜锚短桩基础拉拔荷载作用下桩锚节点的受力特性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 278-288.
[4]	高鲁超, 戴国亮, 张继生, 万志辉, 姚中原, 王洋, . 软黏土大直径单桩水平循环加载离心机模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2411-2420.
[5]	李绍毅. 采用有限元+边界元方法研究非饱和地基中群桩基础的动力阻抗[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(3): 895-907.
[6]	邓世邦, 罗威力. 裹覆隔振层的实心桩纵向振动特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(10): 3081-3094.
[7]	陈慧芸, 冯忠居, 白少奋, 董建松, 夏承明, 蔡杰, . 桥梁桩基穿越溶洞的荷载传递机制试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(5): 1405-1415.
[8]	张聪, 冯忠居, 王富春, 孔元元, 王溪清, 马晓谦, . 强震区软弱土层差异厚度下单桩动力响应振动台试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(4): 1100-1110.
[9]	闫志晓, 李雨润, 王东升, 王永志, . 覆水砂土场地中桥梁群桩基础地震响应离心试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(3): 861-872.
[10]	张昕, 董浩, 徐迎迎, 王柳月, . 竖向循环荷载作用下砂土中单桩承载特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(3): 673-684.
[11]	彭文哲, 赵明华, 杨超炜, 赵衡, . 斜坡桩水平循环特性模型试验及有限杆单元解[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(2): 381-391.
[12]	张正哲, 贾科敏, 许成顺, 潘汝江. 倾斜液化场地−桩基−结构体系在近场脉冲与非脉冲地震动下地震响应差异分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(12): 3629-3638.
[13]	唐亮, 满孝峰, 丛晟亦, 司盼, 凌贤长, 张效禹, 李雪伟, . 液化场地桩基地震失效机制：现状与挑战[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(10): 2979-2996.
[14]	谭飞, 林大伟, 焦玉勇, 于锦. 钢护筒涂层减阻桩隔离层试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S1): 229-236.
[15]	景立平, 吴凡, 李嘉瑞, 汪刚, 齐文浩, 周中一, . 土−桩基−隔震支座−核岛地震反应试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(9): 2483-2492.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

滑动测微管抗渗能力的测试装置及试验研究

Testing device and experimental study on anti-seepage ability of sliding micrometer tube

PDF (Chinese)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0