岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (8): 2685-2692.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.1734

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于改进Green-Ampt模型的花岗岩 残积土边坡降雨入渗规律研究

潘永亮,简文星,李林均,林雨秋,田朋飞   

  1. 中国地质大学(武汉) 工程学院,湖北 武汉430074
  • 收稿日期:2019-10-09 修回日期:2020-01-13 出版日期:2020-08-14 发布日期:2020-10-18
  • 作者简介:潘永亮,男,1995年生,硕士研究生,主要从事工程地质与岩土工程方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    江西省交通运输厅科技计划项目(No. 2015C0026);中国地质大学(武汉)教学实验室开放基金项目(No. SKJ2018099)

A study on the rainfall infiltration of granite residual soil slope with an improved Green-Ampt model

PAN Yong-liang, JIAN Wen-xing, LI Lin-jun, LIN Yu-qiu, TIAN Peng-fei   

  1. Faculty of Engineering, China University of Geosciences(Wuhan),Wuhan, Hubei 430074, China
  • Received:2019-10-09 Revised:2020-01-13 Online:2020-08-14 Published:2020-10-18
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Science and Technology Program of Jiangxi Provincial Transportation Department (2015C0026) and the Open Fund Project of China University of Geosciences (Wuhan) Teaching Laboratory (SKJ2018099).

摘要: 花岗岩残积土广泛分布于我国南方地区,具有许多不良物理力学性质。该类型土边坡在降雨作用下极易发生变形破坏,因此,对花岗岩残积土边坡的降雨入渗规律进行深入研究具有重要意义。在Green-Ampt模型的基础上综合考虑了坡体的初始含水率、地下水位、非饱和特性,建立了一种适用于不同降雨工况的入渗模型,并采用数值模拟及前人经典模型计算结果对该模型进行了验证。运用该模型对赣南3种典型降雨工况下的花岗岩残积土边坡进行了分析,结果表明:在距离地下水位线较远时初始含水率对湿润锋的迁移速率影响不大,但在接近地下水位线附近时湿润锋的迁移速率逐渐增大,呈现出指数形式的变化趋势;相同降雨时间内、不考虑坡面冲刷的情况下,降雨强度略大于土体饱和渗透系数的工况下湿润锋迁移深度最大、边坡稳定性系数降低最多,在实际情况中尤其需要加强防范。

关键词: Green-Ampt入渗模型, 湿润锋, 初始含水率, 降雨工况, 边坡稳定性

Abstract: Granite residual soil is widely distributed in southern China, and it has many poor physical and mechanical properties. Slopes of this type of soil are prone to deformation and failure under the action of rainfall. Therefore, it is of great significance to study the rainfall infiltration mechanism in granite residual soil slopes. On the basis of Green-Ampt model, the initial moisture content, underground water level and unsaturated characteristics of the soil are comprehensively considered. An infiltration model suitable for different rainfall conditions is established, and verified by comparison between numerical simulations and other models. Then, the proposed model is used to analyze granite residual soil slopes under three typical rainfall conditions. The results show that the initial water content has little effect on the migration rate of the wetting front when it is far from groundwater level, whereas the migration rate increases gradually when the wetting front is near groundwater level, presenting an exponential trend. In the same rainfall time, under the condition that the rainfall intensity is slightly greater than the saturated permeability coefficient of soil, the wetting front migration depth is the largest and the slope stability factor decreases the most.

Key words: Green-Ampt infiltration model, wetting front, initial water content, rainfall condition, slope stability

中图分类号: TU 411.4
[1] 邓其宁, 崔玉龙, 王炯超, 郑俊, 许冲, . 三维边坡稳定性计算的ChatGPT辅助编程方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 322-334.
[2] 江文豪, 王浩, 廖光志, 陈滨华, . 时变降雨场景下双层非饱和土中水分一维瞬态渗流解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2721-2737.
[3] 徐全, 侯靖, 杨剑, 杨昕光, 倪绍虎, 陈鑫. 基于合成岩体技术的岩质边坡稳定性精细化分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2062-2070.
[4] 元志镕, 蒋水华, 常志璐, 向晖, 刘玉伟, 黄劲松, . 考虑初始含水率非均匀分布及孔隙水重分布的边坡可靠度分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 1001-1012.
[5] 邓东平, 徐润冬, 彭一航, 文莎莎. 强度空间非均质性与各向异性特征下边坡稳定性极限平衡滑面应力法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 55-72.
[6] 林滨强, 章德生, 简文彬, 豆红强, 王浩, 樊秀峰, . 风驱雨作用下植被斜坡稳定性响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2765-2774.
[7] 赵再昆, 王铁行, 张亮, 金鑫, 鲁洁, 阮嘉斌, 邢昱, . 高温作用下非饱和黄土裂隙演化及其定量分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(5): 1297-1308.
[8] 邓东平, 彭一航, 柳梦琦, 李媛媛. 滑面极径-应力-强度耦合关联下非线性破坏特征边坡稳定性极限平衡分析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(11): 3235-3258.
[9] 冯嵩, 郑颖人, 高红, . 岩土常规三轴Drucker-Prager准则[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(10): 2919-2928.
[10] 田升奎, 刘观仕, 赵青松, 徐国方, 蔡铭炫, . 基于图像RGB信息测试湿度场技术的风积沙毛细水上升试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(9): 2525-2536.
[11] 张文莲, 孙晓云, 陈勇, 金申熠, . 基于岩体抗压强度折减的边坡稳定性分析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S2): 607-615.
[12] 阙云, 翁斌, 蔡松林, LIU Jin-yuan, . 非饱和透明土优先流迁移规律分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(4): 857-867.
[13] 侯乐乐, 翁效林, 李 林, 周容名, . 考虑含水率影响的结构性黄土临界状态模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(3): 737-748.
[14] 刘阿强, 李旭, 刘艳, 张志远. 全吸力范围内渗透系数快速测定方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(11): 3209-3219.
[15] 屈春来, 付迪, 刘世伟, 冷先伦, 李建贺, 孙熇远. 非均质成层边坡极限承载力上限分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(10): 2923-2932.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!