岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (8): 2829-2838.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.1703

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

抗转动对颗粒材料组构特性的影响研究

邹宇雄1, 2,马刚1, 2,李易奥1, 2,陈远1, 2,周伟1, 2,邱焕峰3   

  1. 1. 武汉大学 水资源与水电工程科学国家重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430072;2. 武汉大学 水工岩石力学教育部重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430072; 3. 中国电建集团贵阳勘测设计研究院有限公司,贵州 贵阳 550081
  • 收稿日期:2019-10-02 修回日期:2020-01-08 出版日期:2020-08-14 发布日期:2020-10-18
  • 通讯作者: 马刚,男,1985年生,博士,副教授,主要从事高坝结构数值仿真研究。E-mail: magang630@whu.edu.cn E-mail: yx_zou@whu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:邹宇雄,男,1995年生,硕士研究生,主要从事高坝结构数值仿真研究
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 51825905, No. U1865204, No. 51779194);贵州省科技计划项目(黔科合基础[2016]1154);华能集团科技项目(HNKJ18- H26)。

Impact of rotation resistance on fabric of granular materials

ZOU Yu-xiong1, 2, MA Gang1, 2, LI Yi-Ao1, 2, CHEN Yuan1, 2, ZHOU Wei1, 2, QIU Huan-feng3   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering Science, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430072, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Rock Mechanics in Hydraulic Structural Engineering of the Ministry of Education, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430072, China; 3. Power China Guiyang Engineering Corporation Limited, Guiyang, Guizhou 550081, China
  • Received:2019-10-02 Revised:2020-01-08 Online:2020-08-14 Published:2020-10-18
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51825905, U1865204, 51779194), the Guizhou Science and Technology Project([2016]1154) and the Science and Technology Project of China Huaneng Group (HNKJ18-H26).

摘要: 颗粒材料大多由不规则形状的颗粒组成,如砂土、谷物等,抵抗转动是不规则形状颗粒的固有特性。已有研究表明,颗粒抗转动特性对其宏观力学特性有显著影响。因此,在颗粒材料的细观数值模拟中或采用非圆颗粒,或在圆颗粒离散元模拟中采用考虑抗转动的接触模型。采用有限元-离散元耦合方法(FDEM)和离散元方法(DEM)分别对椭球形状颗粒和具有抗转动能力的圆球颗粒进行三轴剪切数值模拟,指出了采用抗转动接触模型考虑颗粒形状影响的局限性,并基于颗粒的局部排布结构揭示了形状影响的细观来源。峰值内摩擦角和剪胀均随着转动摩擦系数和形状偏离圆球程度而单调增加,但颗粒形状对它们的影响呈现出明显的收敛趋势。细观组构分析也表明,虽然颗粒形状和转动摩擦都能显著增强组构各向异性,但是组构各向异性的演化模式有明显的区别。造成以上结果的差异在于其抵抗转动的影响机制不同。转动摩擦是通过限制颗粒转动,增强了颗粒间的稳定承载能力,而非圆颗粒是通过咬合作用形成稳定的局部排列结构。由于椭球颗粒腹部比端部能够传递更大的接触力,颗粒受剪切后发生转动,颗粒长轴倾向于正交大主应力方向,呈现交错排列,颗粒间相互锁定。

关键词: 抗转动特性, 颗粒形状, 细观组构, 各向异性, 排布结构

Abstract: Granular materials are mostly composed of irregularly shaped particles, such as sand, grain and so on. Resistance to the rotation is an inherent characteristic of irregularly shaped particles. Previous studies have shown that the anti-rotation characteristics of particles have a significant effect on their macro-mechanical responses. Therefore, the non-spherical particles or the spherical particles with a contact model considering rolling resistance are widely employed in the mesoscopic numerical simulations of granular materials. In this paper, the combined finite and discrete element method (FDEM) and discrete element method (DEM) are used to simulate the triaxial tests of ellipsoidal particles and spherical particles with rolling resistance, respectively. The limitations of the rolling resistance model capturing particle shape effects are pointed out, and the meso sources of shape influence are revealed from the perspective of particle configuration structure. Peak deviatoric stress and dilatancy both change monotonically with rolling friction coefficient and the degree of deviation from a spherical shape, but the influence of particle shape on them shows obvious convergence. The mesoscopic fabric analysis also shows that although both particle shape and rolling resistance can significantly enhance the fabric anisotropy, but there are significant differences in the fabric anisotropy evolution mode between the two particle systems. The difference of the above results lies in the different influence mechanism of rotation resistance. Rolling friction enhances the stable bearing capacity of particles by limiting the rotation of particles, while non-spherical particles form a stable local arrangement structure through interlocking. Since the middle of ellipsoid particles can transfer greater contact force than the end, the particles rotate during shearing, and the long axis of the particles tends to be orthogonal to the direction of the largest principal stress, presenting a staggered arrangement, which means that particles lock together.

Key words: rolling resistance, particle shape, mesoscopic fabric, anisotropy, configuration structure

中图分类号: TV 641
[1] 常建梅, 田世龙, 李翔, 冯怀平, KUVANDIK Lesov, . 不同形状废旧轮胎橡胶颗粒改良道砟动剪切性能及细观作用研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 721-728.
[2] 曹苏南, 李春红, 陈远兵, 费康, . 循环荷载作用下砂土−结构物仿生 界面剪切特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 821-832.
[3] 吕志涛, 赵志远, 蔡毅, 夏才初, 段君义. 单向冻融作用下砂岩力学各向异性演化与损伤模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3421-3430.
[4] 董佳斌, 鲁一帆, 金毅, 董文浩, 侯鹏, 刘顺喜, 牛然. 彭水页岩节理面形貌的分形特征及基于节理粗糙度系数的各向异性表征[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3549-3561.
[5] 耿潇威, 陈成, 孙中华, 黎伟, 王勇, 徐梦冰, 余颂, . 基于广义位势理论的考虑组构各向异性的砂土本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3175-3186.
[6] 邓东平, 徐润冬, 彭一航, 文莎莎. 强度空间非均质性与各向异性特征下边坡稳定性极限平衡滑面应力法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 55-72.
[7] 肖劲卿, 温松诚, 郭源, . 基于单孔冲刷测试的黏性土抗侵蚀性及各向异性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 187-198.
[8] 郑思维, 胡明鉴, 霍玉龙, . 钙质砂渗透性影响因素及预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 217-224.
[9] 孔洋, 阮怀宁, 汪璋淳, . 模拟柱状节理玄武岩试样的失效模式与各向异性特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 259-266.
[10] 高荡, 彭俊, 王航龙, 王林飞, 彭坤, . 含层理砂岩真三轴条件下力学特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 349-358.
[11] 胡锦方, 杨启贵, 熊堃, 马刚, 程家林, 周伟, 常晓林, . 软岩筑坝颗粒的破碎特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 359-370.
[12] 王伟, 罗霄, 陈超, 刘世藩, 段雪雷, 朱其志, . 层状岩石不排气三轴压缩力学特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(5): 1334-1342.
[13] 张卫杰, 张炜, 陈宇, 杜颖, 姬建, 高玉峰, . 黏聚力随机场波动范围的各向异性对流态性滑坡滑动距离的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(4): 1039-1050.
[14] THENDAR Yoshua, LIM Aswin. 考虑地下连续墙接缝的深基坑RFD系统研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(12): 3717-3727.
[15] 周闯, 钱建固, 尹振宇, . 各向异性砂土渗流潜蚀流体动力学-离散元流固耦合分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(1): 302-312.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!