岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (9): 3056-3065.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.1675

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

巨厚沉积土夹火山岩场地非线性地震反应特性

陈国兴1, 2,李磊1, 2,丁杰发1, 2,赵凯1, 2   

  1. 1. 南京工业大学 岩土工程研究所,江苏 南京 210009;2. 南京工业大学 江苏省土木工程防震技术研究中心,江苏 南京 210009
  • 收稿日期:2019-09-25 修回日期:2020-03-19 出版日期:2020-09-11 发布日期:2020-10-21
  • 作者简介:陈国兴,男,1963年生,博士,教授,主要从事土动力学与岩土地震工程研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划项目(No.2018YFC1504301)。

Nonlinear seismic response characteristics of extremely deep deposit site with volcanic hard rock interlayers

CHEN Guo-xing1, 2, LI Lei1, 2, DING Jie-fa1, 2, ZHAO Kai1, 2   

  1. 1. Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, Nanjing Tech. University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210009, China; 2. Civil Engineering and Earthquake Disaster Prevention Center of Jiangsu Province, Nanjing Tech. University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210009, China
  • Received:2019-09-25 Revised:2020-03-19 Online:2020-09-11 Published:2020-10-21
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2018YFC1504301)。

摘要: 地震基岩深度和土体动力本构模型的选取对核岛场地地震效应评价结果的合理性具有重要影响。以拟建某沿海核电厂深度470 m沉积土夹火山岩层场地的3个钻孔剖面为研究对象,采用一维等效线性波传分析(ELA)法、基于Matasovic本构模型和Davidenkov-Chen-Zhao(DCZ)本构模型的一维非线性分析(NLA)法,选取不同剪切波速的5个岩土层作为地震基岩,研究了输入地震动特性、地震基岩深度和土体动力本构模型的选取对巨厚沉积土夹火山岩层场地非线性地震反应特性的影响。结果表明:(1)以浅层硬岩夹层或深部土层作为地震基岩,NLA法计算的5%阻尼比的地表谱加速度SA的短周期部分较之ELA法的计算值大,但两者计算的地表SA谱的长周期部分几乎一致;(2)基于Matasovic模型和DCZ模型的NLA法计算的地表SA谱谱形和峰值加速度随深度的变化趋势基本一致;(3)从NLA法计算的地表峰值加速度和累积绝对速度而言,以剪切波速约2 500 m/s的浅层硬岩夹层作为地震基岩是适宜的。

关键词: 巨厚沉积土场地, 场地非线性地震反应, 地震基岩, 硬岩夹层

Abstract: The depth to seismic bedrock and the nonlinear and hysteretic model of soil under cyclic loading have essential influences on the evaluation results of the nuclear island seismic site response. Using the one-dimensional (1D) equivalent linear wave propagation analysis (ELA) and nonlinear analysis (NLA) methods based on both the Matasovic and the Davidenkov-Chen-Zhao (DCZ) hysteretic models, three borehole profiles of 470 m depth with volcanic rock interlayer for the AP1000 nuclear plant located in the coastal deposits in China are selected to numerically simulate seismic site response. Five rock and soil layers with different shear wave velocities and depths are selected as the seismic bedrocks, the effects of input ground motion characteristics, the depth to seismic bedrock and the soil nonlinear and hysteretic model on the nonlinear site response characteristics of extremely deep deposit with volcanic hard rock interlayer are investigated. The results show that regardless of taking a shallow hard rock interlayer or a deep soil layer as the seismic bedrock, the 5%-damped surface spectral accelerations (SAs) at short periods calculated by the NLA method is greater than those calculated by the ELA method. However, the surface SAs at long periods calculated by the NLA and ELA methods are almost identical. Moreover, the curve shapes of surface SAs and peak accelerations along the soil depth calculated by the NLA method based on both the Matasovic and the DCZ models are basically consistent. Finally, from the surface peak ground acceleration and the cumulative absolute velocity calculated by the NLA method, it is suitable to select a shallow hard rock interlayer with the shear wave velocity of approximately 2 500 m/s as the seismic bedrock.

Key words: extremely deep soil deposit site, nonlinear seismic site response, seismic bedrock, hard rock interlayer

中图分类号: TU435
[1] 黄超, 钱建固, . 水锤作用下饱和地基蓄排水隧道的动力响应[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(12): 3802-3814.
[2] 王新龙, 聂利青, 蔡国军, 张宁, 赵泽宁, 刘薛宁, 宋登辉, . 基于孔压静力触探技术的SVR优化算法评估土体液性指数[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 645-653.
[3] 周恩全, 白宇航, 姚缘, 王龙, 陆建飞, . 橡胶混合黏土小应变剪切模量特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(3): 705-713.
[4] 王瑞, 胡志平. 铁路路基动力响应的2.5D有限元方法研究现状及展望[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(1): 284-301.
[5] 黄晓实, 黄俊清, 颜业敢, 汪玉冰, . 基于动土压力影响的坝基动剪切模量反演研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(10): 2889-2898.
[6] 唐亮, 满孝峰, 丛晟亦, 司盼, 凌贤长, 张效禹, 李雪伟, . 液化场地桩基地震失效机制:现状与挑战[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(10): 2979-2996.
[7] 贾端阳, 陈龙伟, 谢旺青, 李鑫洋, . 基于标准贯入试验的土壤液化判别公式锤击数 基准值研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(10): 3031-3038.
[8] 王志颖, 郭明珠, 曾金艳, 王晨, 刘晃. 地震作用下含软弱夹层顺层岩质斜坡 动力响应的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(9): 2566-2578.
[9] 贾宝新, 周志扬, 苑文雅, 张晶. 基于等效质点峰值振动速度的高铁线路周边建筑结构振动评价研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(9): 2696-2706.
[10] 李博南, 符伟, 张雪冰, . 高温、高含冰量冻土中弹性波的传播特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(7): 1916-1924.
[11] 王丽艳, 吉文炜, 陶云翔, 唐跃, 王炳辉, 蔡晓光, 张雷, . 格栅条带式加筋废旧轮胎胎面挡土墙 抗震性能试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(4): 931-940.
[12] 姜海波, 付龙龙, 周顺华, 郭培军, 叶伟涛, . 高频振动下散粒体−结构界面临界状态强度特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(3): 810-820.
[13] 蒋汇鹏, 马强, 曹亚鹏, . P波在弹性介质与饱和冻土介质分界面上的透反射问题研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(3): 916-929.
[14] 陈泰江, 向欣, 章广成, . 基于线黏弹性接触的落石冲击地面参量理论研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(9): 2410-2420.
[15] 孟凡丽, 娄桢桢, 葛威, . 长期循环荷载下卸荷粉土动力特性的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S1): 383-388.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!