岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (S1): 115-122.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.1425

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

恒定渗流作用泥石流碎屑物质起动判别模型研究

安笑1, 2, 3,潘华利1, 2,欧国强1, 2,孔玲1, 2, 3,李炳志1, 2, 3   

  1. 1. 中国科学院山地灾害与地表过程重点实验室,四川 成都 610041;2. 中国科学院?水利部成都山地灾害与环境研究所,四川 成都 610041; 3. 中国科学院大学,北京 100049
  • 收稿日期:2019-08-17 修回日期:2019-12-10 出版日期:2020-06-19 发布日期:2020-06-04
  • 通讯作者: 潘华利,女,1982年生,博士,研究员,主要从事山地灾害动力学方面的研究。E-mail: hlpan@imde.ac.cn E-mail:anxiao2017@163.com
  • 作者简介:安笑,女,1993年生,硕士研究生,主要从事泥石流起动相关方面的研究。

Recognition model on triggering debris flow under constant seepage condition

AN Xiao1, 2, 3, PAN Hua-li1, 2, OU Guo-qiang1, 2, KONG Ling1, 2, 3, LI Bing-zhi1, 2, 3   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Mountain Hazards and Surface Processes, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China; 2. Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China; 3. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • Received:2019-08-17 Revised:2019-12-10 Online:2020-06-19 Published:2020-06-04

摘要: 恒定渗流条件是泥石流碎屑物质起动的主要水动力条件之一,目前鲜有学者对其起动判别模型和坡体内水力学参数变化规律进行研究。初步选取结构简单的碎屑物质作为地质模型进行理论分析,建立起动判别模型,借助模型试验对坡体内水力学参数的变化规律进行探究,同时对判别模型进行验证,并与其他模型进行对比分析。结果表明,恒定渗流过程对碎屑物质起动的作用力主要包括渗透力及渗流冲刷力;渗流速度随底床坡度、入水流量的增大而增大,但随入水流量增加的幅度较小;平行于水流方向的总水头损失随底床坡度的增大呈先减小后增大趋势,随入水流量增大而增大;稳定系数与底床坡度间呈幂函数关系,关系系数因判别模型不同而有所差异;与其他模型相比,模型经严格推导,满足量纲分析和试验验证要求,精度更高。

关键词: 泥石流, 恒定渗流, 起动判别模型, 渗透力, 渗流冲刷力

Abstract: Constant seepage conditions are one of the main hydrodynamic conditions for triggering the debris flow. However, few scholars have studied the triggering discriminant model and the variation of hydraulic parameters in the slope. In this paper, a simple geological structure consisting of the debris is selected for theoretical analysis, and the triggering discriminant model of debris flow is established. The variation of hydraulic parameters in the slope is studied by means of the model test. The discriminant model is verified and compared with other models. The results show that both the seepage force and the seepage scouring force play an important role in controlling the movement of debris during the constant seepage process. The seepage velocity increases with the increase of bed slope and inlet water flow rate, but the variation degree is smaller for the latter case. The total water head loss parallel to the water flow direction decreases at first and then increases with the increase of the bed slope, and it has a positive correlation with inlet water flow rate. The stability coefficient and the bed slope show a power function relationship. The correlation coefficient differs depending on different discriminant models. Compared with other models, the discrimination model presented in this paper is strictly deduced to meet the requirements of dimensional analysis and experimental verification, and it has a much higher accuracy.

Key words: 国家重点研发计划项目(No.2017YFC1502502, No.2017YFC1502506);国家自然科学基金项目(No.51679229, No.41672318);云南省应用基础研究计划项目(No.2016FB074);中国科学院成都山地所135项目(2017年);中国科学院青年创新促进会(No.2018405)。

中图分类号: This work was supported by the National Key R & D Program(2017YFC1502502, 2017YFC1502506), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51679229, 41672318), Yunnan Province Applied Basic Research Program(2016FB074), Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Project 135 (2017), and Youth Innovation Promotion Association of Chinese Academy of Sciences(2018405).
[1] 张治国, 叶铜, 朱正国, PAN Y T, 吴钟腾, . 波浪作用下含气海床内盾构隧道水力及位移响应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(6): 1557-1574.
[2] 王东坡, 赵军, 张小梅, 杨鑫, . 开口柔性防护网调控泥石流性能试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(5): 1237-1248.
[3] 袁帅, 冯德旺, 张森豪, 邢运鹏, 柯尊启, . 考虑水力参数空间变异性的盾构 隧道开挖面稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(11): 3153-3162.
[4] 梁恒, 李吉林, 刘发明, 张伦, 付刚, 李明清, 何思明, . 基于光滑粒子流体动力学方法的 泥石流冲击桥墩试验模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(5): 1473-1484.
[5] 王东坡, 张小梅. 泥石流冲击弧形拦挡坝动力响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(12): 3851-3861.
[6] 韩征, 粟滨, 李艳鸽, 王伟, 王卫东, 黄健陵, 陈光齐, . 基于HBP本构模型的泥石流动力过程SPH数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 477-485.
[7] 王东坡, 陈政, 何思明, 陈克坚, 刘发明, 李明清, . 泥石流冲击桥墩动力相互作用物理模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3363-3372.
[8] 王友彪, 姚昌荣, 刘赛智, 李亚东, 张 迅. 泥石流对桥墩冲击力的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 616-623.
[9] 尹晓萌, 晏鄂川, 刘旭耀, 李兴明, . 土体稳定性计算中地下水作用力探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 156-164.
[10] 李兆华,胡 杰,冯吉利,龚文俊. 基于黏弹塑性本构模型的泥石流数值模拟[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 513-520.
[11] 陈兴长,陈 慧,游 勇,柳金峰,. 泥石流拦砂坝底扬压力分布及影响因素试验[J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3229-3236.
[12] 胡卸文,刁仁辉,梁敬轩,罗 刚,魏 来,. 基于CFX的江口沟泥石流危险区范围预测模拟[J]. , 2016, 37(6): 1689-1696.
[13] 杨进兵,陈兴长,汪 惠,田小平,贾利蓉. 泥石流堆积物中细颗粒含量与渗透系数关系试验研究[J]. , 2016, 37(11): 3184-3190.
[14] 蒋中明 ,龙 芳 ,熊小虎 ,冯树荣 ,钟辉亚,. 边坡稳定性分析中的渗透力计算方法考证[J]. , 2015, 36(9): 2478-2486.
[15] 曾 超 ,苏志满 ,雷 雨 ,余 健,. 泥石流浆体与大颗粒冲击力特征的试验研究[J]. , 2015, 36(7): 1923-1930.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!