岩土力学 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (1): 113-124.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2020.0797

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

成层软土地基预固结处理后桩基水平 承载力估算方法

黄朝煊1,袁文喜1,胡国杰2   

  1. 1. 浙江省水利水电勘测设计院,浙江 杭州 310002; 2. 中国科学院西北生态环境资源研究院 冰冻圈科学国家重点实验室 青藏高原冰冻圈观测研究站,甘肃 兰州 730000
  • 收稿日期:2020-06-11 修回日期:2020-10-11 出版日期:2021-01-11 发布日期:2021-01-06
  • 作者简介:黄朝煊,男,1983年生,硕士,高级工程师,国家注册土木工程师,主要从事水工结构及岩土工程设计与研究。
  • 基金资助:
    浙江省基础公益研究计划项目(No. LGF18E090004);浙江省水利厅科技计划项目(No. RC1701);浙江省水利水电勘测设计院科标业项目资助(No. B1803)

An estimation method of horizontal bearing capacity of piles after pre-consolidation treatment for layered soft foundation

HUANG Chao-xuan1, YUAN Wen-xi1, HU Guo-jie2   

  1. 1. Zhejiang Design Institute of Water Conservancy and Hydroelectric Power, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310002, China; 2. Cryosphere Research Station on Qinghai-Xizang Plateau, State Key Laboratory of Cryospheric Science, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, China
  • Received:2020-06-11 Revised:2020-10-11 Online:2021-01-11 Published:2021-01-06
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Basic Public Welfare Research Project of Zhejiang Province (LGF18E090004), the Science and Technology Project of Zhejiang Water Resources Department (RC1701) and the Science Standard Industry Project of Zhejiang Water Conservancy and Hydropower Survey & Design Institute (B1803).

摘要: 目前通过对软土地基预加固处理来提高桩基水平承载力已被工程界认可,但如何在工程前期设计过程中估算软土地基预处理后桩基水平承载力提高值仍是技术难点。基于此,参考Bowles[1]的地基土水平抗力计算式,同时考虑成层软土地基预排水固结处理影响,通过数学推导,推求出根据原状软土室内土工试验抗剪强度指标及预加固处理时间,估算软土地基预处理后桩基水平承载力提高值的实用计算方法。考虑桩侧土弹塑性屈服影响,推导出成层软土中水平受荷桩弹塑性解析解及塑性区深度的计算式,给出了桩顶水平位移、桩身最大弯矩的无量纲计算式及相关计算源代码。依托于浙江省某水闸桩基工程案例,根据提出的计算方法对桩基水平承载力、桩顶水平位移及桩身最大弯矩等性状进行预估计算,并与地基预处理前、后现场试桩检测值进行验证对比,认为桩基水平承载力、桩顶水平位移及桩身最大弯矩等预估计算成果与工程现场试桩的检测值较接近,对类似工程设计具有较好的参考价值。

关键词: 地基预加固处理, 桩基水平承载力, 水平抗力, 幂级数解法, 屈服位移, 抗剪强度指标, 解析解

Abstract: At present, the improvement of the horizontal bearing capacity of the piles by pre-consolidation of the soft soil foundation has been well recognized by practising engineers. However, how to estimate the increment of horizontal bearing capacity of piles during the pre-engineering process is still difficult. In this article, a practical calculation method for estimating the increment of horizontal bearing capacity of piles is established based on the Bowles[1] method and by considering the impact of pre-drainage and pre-consolidation treatment of the layered soft soil foundation. This method provides an effective way to calculate the shear strength index and pre-consolidation treatment time based on the shear strength of undisturbed soft soil by laboratory test. Meanwhile, the elastoplastic solution of the horizontally loaded pile and the calculation formula of the plastic zone depth of layered soft soil foundation are analytically derived, based on the influence of elastoplastic yielding of soils surrounding the pile. In addition, the source code for computing the horizontal displacement of the pile top and the maximum bending moment of the pile body are given. Finally, the horizontal displacement, bearing capacity and the maximum bending moment of piles in the sluice pile foundation engineering case in Zhejiang Province are calculated according to the proposed method. The results of the field tests before and after the pre-consolidation treatments are compared. It is found that the estimated results are close to the test results, which may provide a good reference for similar engineering designs.

Key words: pre-consolidation treatment, horizontal bearing capacity of pile foundation, horizontal resistance, power series solution method, yield displacement, shear strength index, analytical solution

中图分类号: U 473
[1] 江文豪, 王浩, 廖光志, 陈滨华, . 时变降雨场景下双层非饱和土中水分一维瞬态渗流解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2721-2737.
[2] 周航, 汪义圣, 亓戈平, . 黏弹性土中异形桩横向动力响应半解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 761-774.
[3] 王浩, 侯泓冰, 江文豪, . 考虑根系对水文特性影响下非饱和植被土中水分一维瞬态渗流解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3329-3345.
[4] 张智卿, 刘鑫, 刘开富, 吴君涛, 吴文兵, . 横观各向同性土体中端承桩水平振动特性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3371-3382.
[5] 江学辉, 颜建伟, 罗文俊, 李佳宝, 徐长节. 纵向压力和加固钢板对隧道力学性能影响的解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1623-1632.
[6] 王亦炀, 李传勋, 李阔, 陆向综. 竖井地基大应变非线性固结解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(5): 1446-1456.
[7] 刘景锦, 罗学思, 雷华阳, 郑刚, 罗昊鹏, . 等应变条件下增压式真空预压固结解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(3): 809-821.
[8] 高柳, 吕述晖, 王奎华, . 缺陷桩-梁系统的动力特性应用研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(10): 3095-3104.
[9] 张玉国, 杨文兵, 赵雅纯, 王闯, 赵亚敏. 双向渗流下考虑应力时空效应的组合桩复合地基固结理论研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(1): 184-196.
[10] 朱建民, 郑建国, 于永堂, 蔡晶, 夏辉, . 新型电控式钻孔剪切仪的研制及测试验证[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 687-697.
[11] 黎亚舟, 李森, . 桶式基础沉贯阻力系数的理论研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 443-448.
[12] 余俊, 李东凯, 和振, 张志中. 带有两端防渗墙坝基的各向异性渗流解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(8): 2381-2388.
[13] 黄娟, 和振, 余俊, 杨鑫歆. 渗透各向异性圆形围堰稳态渗流场解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(4): 1035-1043.
[14] 郑长杰, 崔亦秦, 吴琛, 罗通, 栾鲁宝, . 竖向入射S波作用下单桩水平地震响应简化解析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(2): 327-336.
[15] 余俊, 张志中, 郑靖凡, 和振. 水位波动条件下有封底基坑渗流场孔压解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(12): 3415-3423.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!