岩土力学 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (10): 2865-2874.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.0352

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

移动荷载下土工加筋路堤动力响应特性数值分析

张玲1, 2,欧强1, 2, 3, 4,赵明华1, 2,丁选明3, 4,刘健飞5   

  1. 1. 湖南大学 土木工程学院,湖南 长沙 410082;2. 湖南大学 建筑安全与节能教育部重点实验室,湖南 长沙 410082;3. 重庆大学 土木工程学院,重庆 400045;4. 重庆大学 山地城镇建设与新技术教育部重点实验室,重庆 400045;5. 中国联合工程有限公司,浙江 杭州 310052
  • 收稿日期:2021-03-10 修回日期:2021-06-24 出版日期:2021-10-11 发布日期:2021-10-21
  • 通讯作者: 欧强,男,1992年生,博士,助理研究员,主要从事复合地基与土工加筋技术的研究工作。E-mail: ouq126@cqu.edu.cn E-mail:zhanglhd@163.com
  • 作者简介:张玲,女,1982年生,博士,副教授,主要从事软基处理及桩基础方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 52078205,No. 52108299);湖南省自然科学基金(No. 2020JJ3013);中国博士后科学基金(No. 2021M693740)。

Numerical analysis on dynamic response characteristics of geosynthetic reinforced embankment under moving load

ZHANG Ling1, 2, OU Qiang1, 2, 3, 4, ZHAO Ming-hua1, 2, DING Xuan-ming3, 4, LIU Jian-fei5   

  1. 1. College of Civil Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha, Hunan 410082, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Building Safety and Energy Efficiency of the Ministry of Education, Hunan University, Changsha, Hunan 410082, China; 3. College of Civil Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, China; 4. Key Laboratory of New Technology for Construction of Cities in Mountain Area, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, China; 5. China United Engineering Corporation Limited, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310052, China
  • Received:2021-03-10 Revised:2021-06-24 Online:2021-10-11 Published:2021-10-21
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52078205, 52108299), the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province, China (2020JJ3013) and the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2021M693740).

摘要: 交通移动荷载下土工加筋路堤的动力响应问题一直备受工程界关注。利用ABAQUS有限元软件建立了土工加筋路堤三维数值模型,深入分析了移动荷载下土工加筋路堤的动应力和变形的变化规律。交通移动荷载采用两个移动矩形面荷载模拟,并自行编制Fortran子程序以控制移动荷载的幅值、作用范围及移动速度;编制等效线性黏弹性模型模拟路堤填土以反映路堤填土的黏弹性;土工格栅采用T3D2桁架单元模拟;采用无限元减小由于模型尺寸带来的边界效应;进而建立了不考虑排水固结时移动荷载下土工加筋路堤数值分析模型。利用已有文献结果和计算结果进行了加筋路堤横截面变形和路堤顶面应力的对比验证,并分析了土工加筋路堤数值模型在移动荷载下的纵、横截面动应力分布,竖向动应力分布特性以及车辆超载。结果表明:动应力和动变形在路堤上表面1.0 m以内范围衰减较快,并逐渐过渡为一个等效的幅值较小的均布荷载作用。在相同深度处,轮载正下方的动应力衰减系数最小,双轮载中心处次之,轮载外边缘衰减系数最大。

关键词: 移动荷载, 土工合成材料, 加筋路堤, 有限元, 动力响应

Abstract: The dynamic response of geosynthetic reinforced embankment under traffic moving load has attracted increasing attentions in engineering field. A 3D model of geosynthetic reinforced embankment was established by using the ABAQUS finite element software in this paper, which was used to analyze the dynamic stress and deformation of geosynthetic reinforced embankment under moving load. The traffic load was simulated by two moving rectangular plane loads. Fortran subroutine was developed to control the amplitude, range, and speed of the moving load. The equivalent linear viscoelastic model was developed to simulate embankment fill to reflect the viscoelasticity of embankment fill. The geogrid was simulated by T3D2 truss element. The infinite element was used to reduce the boundary effect caused by model size at the boundary. The numerical model of geosynthetic reinforced embankment under moving load was established without considering drainage consolidation. Based on the results of the existing literatures and the results of this paper, the cross-section deformations of the geosynthetic reinforced embankment and the stress at the embankment top surface were compared and verified. The dynamic stress distribution in the longitudinal section and transverse section and the vertical dynamic stress distribution characteristics of the geosynthetic reinforced embankment under moving load were also analyzed. The results showed that the dynamic stress and deformation decayed rapidly within the range of 1.0 m on the embankment top surface and gradually transitioned to an equivalent uniform load with small amplitude. At the same depth, the attenuation coefficient of dynamic stress under the wheel load was the smallest, followed by that at the center of double wheel loads, and the attenuation coefficient at the outer edge of the wheel load was the largest.

Key words: moving load, geosynthetics, reinforced embankment, finite element, dynamic response

中图分类号: TU 47
[1] 聂耀武, 胡兵, 顾雷雨, 李槟, 周全超, 李文辉, 李琦, 李霞颖, . 二氧化碳地质封存协同上覆煤矿开采的安全风险评估数值模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 491-506.
[2] 张宪成, 池宝涛, 于先泽, 郭前建, 袁伟, 张耀明, . 面向近场有限元法的非结构网格划分及其断裂损伤分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 467-476.
[3] 张弛, 邓龙传, 庄欠伟, 李晓昭, 王秋平, 乔梁, . 基于试验和数值模拟的滚刀旋转破岩受力和效率研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2995-3006.
[4] 陈灯红, 张心瀚, 刘云辉, 胡昊文, 刘云龙, 梁羽翔, . 基于八叉树比例边界有限元法的高拱坝-不规则地基-库水系统非线性地震响应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2586-2599.
[5] 可文海, 杨文海, 李源, 吴磊, . SH波作用下斜坡地形中桩基的动力响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1545-1544.
[6] 周鹏发, 申玉生, 高登, 张熙, 黄海峰, 高波, . 基于混合有限元的显式时域完美匹配层研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1605-1619.
[7] 周波翰, 张文利, 王栋. 球形贯入仪预测超固结土强度的数值研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1303-1309.
[8] 武孝天, 姚仰平, 魏然, 崔文杰. 基于统一硬化模型的隧道施工引发土体变形数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 1013-1024.
[9] 刘文静, 邓辉, 周昕. 地震作用下含双层韧性剪切带高陡岩质边坡动力响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3534-3548.
[10] 邵国建, 毛泽辉, 苏宇宸, 焦泓程, 吕亚茹. 钙质砂透射系数探究:波形耦合作用及梯度提升预测方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3661-3672.
[11] 何颖, 陈雅, 尹奔驰, 刘中宪, 刘旭, . 频率相关等效线性山谷交错场地多点地震动模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3280-3288.
[12] 张瑨, 李书恒, 朱其志, 石玲玲, 邵建富, . 基于深度学习的岩石短长期本构模型及灰砂岩变形预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 289-302.
[13] 韩枥兵, 李文涛, 韦昌富, . 自适应时间步长法在非饱和渗流中的应用研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 685-693.
[14] 戴北冰, 袁新, 周锡文, 刘锋涛, . 考虑间断速度场的光滑有限元极限分析上限法[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2849-2858.
[15] 李晓龙, 赵泽鑫, 陈坤洋, 马鹏, 陈灿, 钟燕辉, 张蓓, . 考虑化学反应的高聚物压密劈裂注浆仿真研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2823-2838.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!