岩土力学 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (12): 3385-3396.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.0264

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

考虑空洞影响的盾构隧道地震易损性分析

陈誉升1,丁祖德1,资昊1,刘正初2,计霞飞1   

  1. 1. 昆明理工大学 建筑工程学院,云南 昆明 650500;2. 中铁二院昆明勘察设计研究院有限责任公司,云南 昆明 650200
  • 收稿日期:2021-02-19 修回日期:2021-07-19 出版日期:2021-12-13 发布日期:2021-12-14
  • 通讯作者: 丁祖德,男,1979年生,博士,教授,主要从事隧道与地下工程方面的教学研究工作。E-mail: dzdvsdt@163.com E-mail:1466687453@qq.com
  • 作者简介:陈誉升,男,1997年生,硕士研究生,主要从事隧道与地下工程方面的研究工作
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.51768028)

Seismic vulnerability analysis of shield tunnels considering cavitation

CHEN Yu-sheng1, DING Zu-de1, ZI Hao1, LIU Zheng-chu2, JI Xia-fei1   

  1. 1. Faculty of Civil Engineering and Mechanics, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, Yunnan 650500, China; 2. Kunming Survey, Design and Research Institute Co., Ltd. of China Railway Second Institute, Kunming, Yunnan 650200, China
  • Received:2021-02-19 Revised:2021-07-19 Online:2021-12-13 Published:2021-12-14
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(51768028).

摘要: 管片背后存在空洞是盾构隧道一种常见的病害现象,它不仅影响土层和管片的静力学行为,还会影响隧道的动力响应,加剧隧道地震破坏。现有的相关研究均采用确定性分析方法,缺少从概率角度的定量评价。以某轨道交通区间盾构隧道为例,考虑空洞位置和尺寸、场地条件以及地震波入射方向等因素,采用动力增量法,开展了基于土层?隧道?空洞相互作用的大量非线性动力时程分析。结合隧道地震易损性理论,研究存在空洞病害的盾构隧道地震易损性。结果表明:空洞尺寸、场地条件和地震动入射方向对隧道地震易损性有重要影响。随着空洞尺寸的增加,空洞及临近区域土体塑性变形成倍增大,管片截面偏心程度增加,承载性能减弱,受影响范围为空洞尺寸的3~5倍。管片背后空洞增大了隧道结构的易损性,空洞越大,易损性增幅越明显。空洞对结构易损性的影响因空洞部位不同而异,在较大尺寸空洞时,影响程度由大到小依次为:边墙、拱肩和拱顶空洞。场地条件越差,会增大隧道的易损性,空洞对易损性的影响也越大。横向和垂向地震动入射方向下,隧道易损性均随空洞尺寸的增加呈非线性增大,虽然垂向地震动下的损伤概率小于横向地震动,但增幅明显更大,受空洞尺寸的影响更为敏感。值得注意的是,针对3种空洞部位和两种地震动入射方向,较大的空洞尺寸都将显著影响结构的抗震性能。

关键词: 盾构隧道, 空洞, 场地条件, 地震波入射方向, 地震损伤, 易损性曲线

Abstract: The existence of cavities behind the segments is one of the common disease phenomena in shield tunnels. The cavities not only affect the static mechanics behavior of soil and segment, but also directly affect the dynamic response of the tunnel, which could aggravate the tunnel’s seismic damage. The existing related researches all use the deterministic analysis methods and lack the quantitative evaluation method in terms of probability perspective. Taking a shield tunnel in a rail transit section as an example, considering factors such as the location and size of the cavity, site conditions, and the incident direction of seismic wave, a large number of nonlinear dynamic time-history analyses are conducted based on the soil-tunnel-void interaction using an increment dynamic analysis method. Combined with the theory of tunnel seismic vulnerability, the seismic vulnerability is studied for the shield tunnel with the cavity disease. It is found that: the size of the cavity, the site conditions and the incidence direction of seismic wave have an important influence on the tunnel seismic vulnerability. As the cavity size increases, the plastic deformation of the soil adjacent to the cavity increases substantially, the eccentricity extent of the segment section increases, and the load-bearing performance decreases, and the affected area is about 3?5 times the cavity size. The cavity behind the segment increases the vulnerability of the tunnel structure. The increase of vulnerability is more obvious with the void size increasing. The impact of the cavity on the structure vulnerability varies with different locations of the cavity. When the cavity size is relatively large, the impact extent shows the following trend with a descending order: the side wall, shoulder, and crown cavity. As site condition worsens, the tunnel vulnerability increases and the influence of the void on tunnel vulnerability also enhance. Under the transverse and vertical incident directions of seismic ground motions, the tunnel vulnerability increases nonlinearly with the increasing of the cavity size. Although the damage probability under vertical ground motion is less than that of transverse ground motion, the increasing extent is significantly larger and more sensitive to the cavity size. It is worth to noting that for the three cavity locations and the two incident directions of ground motion, the larger cavity size may significantly affect the seismic performance of the tunnel structure.

Key words: shield tunnel, cavity, site conditions, incident direction of seismic wave, seismic damage, vulnerability curve

中图分类号: U451
[1] 黄大维, 卢文剑, 罗文俊, 余珏, . 盾构隧道同步注浆对砂土地层竖向位移与周围土压力影响试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2837-2846.
[2] 宋利埼, 章敏, 徐筱, 孙静雯, 俞奎, 李昕尧, . 考虑管片接头转动效应的盾构隧道光纤反演分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2483-2494.
[3] 宋牧原, 杨明辉, 陈伟, 卢贤锥, . 基于自注意力-循环神经网络模型的盾构引发的土体沉降预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2613-2625.
[4] 宋伟涛, 张佩, 杜修力, 林庆涛, . 土性对浅埋盾构隧道施工地层响应影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2179-2188.
[5] 黄明华, 钟煜轩, 陆锦斌, 王克平. 基于非连续地基梁模型的基坑开挖诱发下卧盾构隧道变形分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 492-504.
[6] 谢立夫, 关振长, 黄明, 丘华生, 许超. 考虑主动铰接的盾构-地层相互作用模型及求解研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3574-3584.
[7] 真嘉捷, 赖丰文, 黄明, 廖清香, 李爽, 段岳强. 基于时序聚类和在线学习的盾构掘进地层智能识别方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3615-3625.
[8] 黄大维, 刘家璇, 谭满生, 邓翔浩, 黄永亮, 翁友华, 陈升平, . 盾构隧道底部注浆抬升模拟试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 371-381.
[9] 王小刚, 杨建平, 陈卫忠, 李慧, . 盾构隧道结构响应特征及接缝刚度分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 485-495.
[10] 张治国, 沃巍, 朱正国, 韩凯航, 孙苗苗, . 考虑衬砌截面协调变形约束的既有隧道受盾构下穿施工影响的Fourier能量变分解[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(5): 1397-1411.
[11] 张治国, 罗杰, 朱正国, PAN Y T, 孙苗苗, . 基于极限分析上限法的地震作用下分层地基 盾构隧道开挖面稳定性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(4): 1201-1213.
[12] 潘秋景, 吴洪涛, 张子龙, 宋克志, . 基于多域物理信息神经网络的复合地层隧道掘进地表沉降预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(2): 539-551.
[13] 真嘉捷, 赖丰文, 黄明, 李爽, 许凯. 基于LightGBM-Informer的盾构隧道管片上浮长时间序列预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(12): 3791-3801.
[14] 李文博, 甘晓露, 刘念武, 吴昊, 谌珊珊. 基于短梁−弹簧模型的盾构隧道施工期上浮变形计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(12): 3755-3767.
[15] 黄继辉, 秦世康, 赵昱, 陈景煦, 张浩, . 压气法盾构仓内气压与围岩气−液两相流相互作用模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(12): 3555-3565.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!