岩土力学 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (3): 673-680.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2020.1675

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于应力−应变曲线的礁灰岩脆性特征评价

刘海峰1, 2,郑坤3,朱长歧1,孟庆山1,吴文娟4   

  1. 1. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071;2. 中国科学院南海生态环境工程创新研究院,广东 广州 510301;3. 贵州大学 土木工程学院,贵州 贵阳 550025;4. 山东省交通科学研究院,山东 济南 250100
  • 收稿日期:2020-11-08 修回日期:2021-01-26 出版日期:2021-03-11 发布日期:2021-03-15
  • 通讯作者: 朱长歧,男,1963年生,博士,研究员、博士生导师,主要从事珊瑚岛礁工程地质、水文地质以及生物碳酸盐类岩土的工程特性研究。E-mail: cqzhu@whrsm.ac.cn E-mail:hfliu@whrsm.ac.cn
  • 作者简介:刘海峰,男,1989年生,博士,助理研究员,主要从事海洋钙质沉积物的工程力学特性研究
  • 基金资助:
    中国科学院战略性先导科技专项(A类)(No.XDA13010201,No.XDA13010301);国家自然科学基金资助项目(No.41877271);中国科学院南海生态环境工程创新研究院自主部署项目(No.ISEE2020YB09);湖北省自然科学基金资助项目(No.2020CFB243)

Brittleness evaluation of coral reef limestone base on stress-strain curve

LIU Hai-feng1, 2, ZHENG Kun3, ZHU Chang-qi1, MENG Qing-shan1, WU Wen-juan4   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 2. Innovation Academy of South China Sea Ecology and Environmental Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510301, China; 3. College of Civil Engineering, Guizhou University, Guiyang, Guizhou 550025, China; 4. Shandong Transportation Institute, Jinan, Shandong 250100, China
  • Received:2020-11-08 Revised:2021-01-26 Online:2021-03-11 Published:2021-03-15
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences(XDA13010201, XDA13010301), the National Natural Science Foundation of China(41877271), the Self Deployment Project of Innovation Academy of South China Sea Ecology and Environmental Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences(ISEE2020YB09) and Hubei Natural Science Foundation(2020CFB243).

摘要: 脆性是岩石类材料的重要性质。针对南海某岛礁在某深度范围内的珊瑚格架灰岩、砾块灰岩、砾屑灰岩及砂屑灰岩的钻孔芯样,开展室内物理性质测试及压缩试验。研究表明,礁灰岩的物理力学性质与其沉积组构和成岩作用密切相关;基于峰后应力降的相对大小和绝对速率的脆性指标计算方法能够反映礁灰岩的破坏特征;围压对礁灰岩的脆性指标影响显著,随着围压的增大,试样的脆性指标呈现趋势性降低;单轴压缩条件下,低孔隙率的砂屑灰岩脆性指标与水泥砂浆类似,同时高于格架灰岩及砾块灰岩;随着孔隙率的增大,砂屑灰岩和砾屑灰岩的脆性指标减小,饱和单轴抗压强度也与孔隙率呈负相关关系。

关键词: 珊瑚礁灰岩, 脆性指标, 应力?应变曲线, 围压, 孔隙率

Abstract: This project planed to investigate the brittleness index of coral reef limestone which is an important property of rock materials. For this purpose, physical property test, uniaxial and triaxial compression tests were performed on four types of reef limestone core samples (framestone, bindstone, rudstone and bioclastic limestone) which were sampled in a certain depth from a certain coral reef in South China Sea. The test results show that the physical and mechanical properties of reef limestone are strongly influenced by the fabric and diagenesis. The failure characteristics of reef limestone can be accurately described by the brittleness index which is calculated based on the relative magnitude and the absolute velocity of post peak stress dropping. The investigation also suggests that the brittleness index is sensitive to the confining pressure and decreases with the increase of confining pressure. Meanwhile, under uniaxial compression, the brittleness index of bioclastic limestone with low-porosity is similar to that of cement mortar, and higher than that of framestone and bindstone. Furthermore, with the increase of porosity, the brittleness indexes of rudstone and bioclastic limestone decrease, and the saturated uniaxial compressive strength is negatively correlated with porosity.

Key words: coral reef limestone, brittleness index, stress-strain curve, confining pressure, porosity

中图分类号: TU473
[1] 王宁博, 姚仰平, 刘林, 李翔宇, 毛安琪, 李宁, . 考虑围压效应的砂土统一硬化模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 297-308.
[2] 李槟, 申海萌, 李琦, 李霞颖, . 不同围压条件下花岗岩剪切过程渗透率动态演化规律数值模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 437-453.
[3] 肖智勇, 王刚, 刘杰, 邓华锋, 郑程程, 姜枫, . 基于等效裂隙的表观渗透率模型改进及变滑脱效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1466-1479.
[4] 汪昕, 幸安康, 曾子强, 姜祎, 徐建宇, 王晓南, 刘造保, . 层理铁矿石剪切力学性能试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1039-1048.
[5] 罗斌玉, 苏辕, 刘晓云, 黄腾达, 肖枫亦, 刘兰心, 李鹏程, . 考虑岩层倾角−围压组合效应的岩石强度行为初探[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 775-788.
[6] 吴鹏, 陈健, 付晓东, 黄珏皓, . 循环荷载作用下干燥与饱和泥质粉砂岩变形特性及其能量演化规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 195-207.
[7] 刘宗祺, 陈曦, 崔柳生, 唐建彬. 直剪和双轴离散元数值试验中剪切带宽度的孔隙率场测量技术[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 742-750.
[8] 马林建, 邓家军, 王明洋, 李洪亚, 李增, 李干. 珊瑚礁灰岩平板撞击试验与状态方程研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2232-2241.
[9] 刘家顺, 周妮, 左建平, 郑智勇, 金佳旭, . 卸围压下弱胶结软岩分数阶蠕变损伤本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(10): 2937-2948.
[10] 周建, 尚肖楠, 刘福深, 沈君逸, 廖星川, . 利用近场动力学方法模拟隧道掘进机滚刀三维贯入破岩[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(9): 2732-2743.
[11] 张建新, 马昌虎, 郎瑞卿, 孙立强, 杨爱武, 李迪, . 带围压冻融循环下滨海重塑软土力学特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(7): 1863-1874.
[12] 王伟, 张宽, 曹亚军, 陈超, 朱其志, . 层状千枚岩各向异性力学特性与脆性评价研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(4): 975-989.
[13] 茹文凯, 胡善超, 李地元, 马金银, 张晨曦, 罗平框, 弓昊, 周奥辉, . 煤岩组合体卸围压能量演化规律及耗散能损伤本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(12): 3448-3458.
[14] 侯娟, 张金榜, 孙银玉, 孙瑞, 刘飞禹. 颗粒膨胀对膨润土复合衬垫防渗性能的影响及 介观机制分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(10): 3039-3048.
[15] 魏丽, 柴寿喜, 刘著, 王沛, 李芳, . 以扫描电镜与核磁共振指标评价冻融纤维 加筋土的抗压强度[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S2): 163-170.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!