岩土力学 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (5): 1201-1209.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2020.1429

• 基础理论与实验研究 •    下一篇

红黏土土层锚杆界面剪切应力松弛试验及其模型

陈昌富1, 2,杜成1, 2,朱世民1, 2,何仕林1, 2,张根宝3   

  1. 1. 湖南大学 建筑安全与节能教育部重点实验室,湖南 长沙 410082;2. 湖南大学 土木工程学院,湖南 长沙 410082; 3. 湖南城市学院 土木工程学院,湖南 益阳 413000
  • 收稿日期:2020-09-21 修回日期:2020-12-21 出版日期:2021-05-11 发布日期:2021-05-03
  • 作者简介:陈昌富,男,1963年生,博士,教授,主要从事边坡工程及支护工程、地基处理等方面的研究工作
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(No. 41572298;No. 51978254);湖南省自然科学基金项目(No. 2020JJ5024)

Experimental study and model of interface shear stress relaxation behavior of anchors in red clay

CHEN Chang-fu1, 2, DU Cheng1, 2, ZHU Shi-min1, 2, HE Shi-lin1, 2, ZHANG Gen-bao3   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Building Safety and Energy Efficiency of Ministry of Education, Hunan University, Changsha, Hunan 410082, China; 2. College of Civil Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha, Hunan 410082, China; 3. College of Civil Engineering, Hunan City University, Yiyang, Hunan 413000, China
  • Received:2020-09-21 Revised:2020-12-21 Online:2021-05-11 Published:2021-05-03
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41572298; 51978254) and the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province, China (2020JJ5024).

摘要: 锚-土界面剪切应力松弛是引起锚杆(索)预应力损失的关键因素。首先,研制了锚-土界面剪切应力松弛试验装置;然后,针对红黏土锚固单元体试样,分级施加恒定的界面剪切位移,获得了锚-土界面剪切应力松弛全过程曲线,并采用坐标平移法将分级加载曲线转化成分别加载曲线;再引入分数阶微积分理论改进黏壶元件,建立了红黏土-锚固体界面剪切分数阶M||N(由Maxwell体和Newton体并联组成)松弛模型,选取部分剪切位移水平下的松弛试验曲线回归分析得到了各模型参数,同时还拟合得到了各模型参数随剪切位移的变化关系;最后,采用建立的松弛模型,对另一部分剪切位移水平下的松弛曲线进行预测。研究结果表明:相比于整数阶M||N模型、Burgers模型以及五元件模型(H||M||M),提出的分数阶M||N松弛模型不仅具有结构简单、参数较少等优点,也具备更高的拟合及预测精度。

关键词: 预应力锚杆;红黏土;锚-土界面;应力松弛;分数阶微积分;M, N模型

Abstract: The shear stress relaxation of the anchor-soil interface is the key factor causing the prestress loss of anchor rod (cable). Firstly, a device for testing the shear stress relaxation of the anchor-soil interface was developed. Secondly, a constant interface shear displacement was applied in stages to the red clay anchored element sample, and the whole process of shear stress relaxation curve of anchor-soil interface was obtained, which can be transformed to the relaxation curve at each specific loading level by using coordinate translation method. Then, the theory of fractional calculus was introduced to improve the viscous pot element, and established the red clay-anchor solid interface shear fractional M||N (composed of Maxwell body and Newton body in parallel) relaxation model. The model parameters were yielded by regression analysis of relaxation test curves under partial shear displacements, and the relationship between the model parameters and the shear displacements was also obtained by fitting. Finally, the established fractional M||N relaxation model was applied to predict another part of the relaxation curve under shear displacement level. By comparing the integer-order M||N model, the Burgers model and the five-element model (H||M||M), the results indicate that the proposed fractional M||N relaxation model not only has the advantages of simple structure and fewer parameters, but also has higher fitting and prediction accuracy.

Key words: prestressed anchor, red clay, anchor-soil interface, stress relaxation, fractional calculus, M, N model

中图分类号: TU 470
[1] 王立安, 余云燕, 任新, 陈辉, . 循环荷载作用下分数阶饱和黏土地基的动力固结分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2279-2289.
[2] 周恩全, 白宇航, 姚缘, 王龙, 陆建飞, . 橡胶混合黏土小应变剪切模量特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(3): 705-713.
[3] 周兵红. 一种预测砂土土-水特征曲线的简化方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S1): 222-228.
[4] 李双龙, 魏丽敏, 冯胜洋, 何群, 张开鑫, . 基于扩展Koppejan模型的被动桩−软土 时效性相互作用研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(9): 2602-2614.
[5] 吴琪, 刘抗, 郭启洲, 赵凯, 陈国兴, . 基于二元介质模型的砂类土 小应变剪切模量评价方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(11): 3641-3650.
[6] 金磊磊, 魏玉峰, 黄鑫, 魏婕. 基于节理面三维形貌的岩石节理抗剪强度 计算模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(10): 3355-3364.
[7] 杨文保, 吴琪, 陈国兴, . 长江入海口原状土动剪切模量预测方法探究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 3889-3896.
[8] 杨秀荣,姜谙男,江宗斌. 含水状态下软岩蠕变试验及损伤模型研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 167-174.
[9] 赵婷婷,冯云田,王 敏,王 勇,. 基于改进粗糙表面Greenwood-William 接触模型的离散元方法[J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3440-3452.
[10] 冯晓伟,王 伟,王如宾,袁双双,朱其志, . 考虑水化学损伤的砂岩流变损伤本构模型[J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3340-3346.
[11] 毕 骏,谌文武,戴鹏飞,林高潮, . 校正系数对不同形式的Van Genuchten方程各拟合参数的影响[J]. , 2018, 39(4): 1302-1310.
[12] 刘忠玉,杨 强. 基于分数阶Kelvin模型的饱和黏土一维流变固结分析[J]. , 2017, 38(12): 3680-3687.
[13] 毕 骏,谌文武, . 参数m的形式和最大基质吸力点对Van Genuchten方程各参数的影响[J]. , 2017, 38(12): 3604-3612.
[14] 浦少云,饶军应,杨凯强,黄质宏,李永辉,陈泽南,李 勤,刘汉卿,. 循环荷载下土体变形特性研究[J]. , 2017, 38(11): 3261-3270.
[15] 张治国,鲁明浩,宫剑飞,. 黏弹性地基中基坑开挖对邻近桩基变形影响的时域解[J]. , 2017, 38(10): 3017-3028.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!