岩土力学 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (5): 1281-1290.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2020.1316

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

南海珊瑚砂地基承载力模型试验研究

沈扬1,冯照雁1, 2,邓珏1,陈锴嘉1,许俊红3   

  1. 1. 河海大学 岩土力学与堤坝工程教育部重点实验室,江苏 南京 210098;2. 南京汤山温泉旅游度假区管理委员会,江苏 南京 211132; 3. 南京林业大学 土木工程学院,江苏 南京 210037
  • 收稿日期:2020-08-31 修回日期:2020-12-28 出版日期:2021-05-11 发布日期:2021-05-07
  • 作者简介:沈扬,男,1980年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事土体静动力学特性和本构理论的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(No. 51979087)

Model test on bearing capacity of coral sand foundation in the South China Sea

SHEN Yang1, FENG Zhao-yan1, 2, DENG Jue1, CHEN Kai-jia1, XU Jun-hong3   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Geomechanics and Embankment Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210098, China; 2. Nanjing Tangshan Hot Spring Resort Management Committee, Nanjing, Jiangsu 211132, China; 3. School of Civil Engineering, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210037, China
  • Received:2020-08-31 Revised:2020-12-28 Online:2021-05-11 Published:2021-05-07
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51979087).

摘要: 珊瑚砂是一种工程性状特殊的土,研究珊瑚砂的承载性能对南海岛礁建设具有重要意义。通过自制平板载荷室内模型装置量化研究珊瑚砂密实度、级配及载荷板的形状、尺寸对珊瑚砂地基承载力影响,并对比了珊瑚砂与石英砂承载力的差异性。试验表明:比对相同密实度的石英砂,珊瑚砂颗粒形态扁平的特征突出、棱角分明,致使内摩擦角增大,也相应引起承载力提升。同荷载下沉降量比前者小得多,且基础对承载力的尺寸效应也明显大于石英砂。而珊瑚砂地基土的应力水平依存系数与相对密实度呈线性相关,内摩擦角受级配影响显著,建立了地基承载力系数Nγ与内摩擦角?之间的关系式。珊瑚砂地基的承载力随载荷板尺寸的增大而增大,方形基础下珊瑚砂地基的承载能力明显高于同面积的圆形基础,且尺寸效应发挥得更明显,说明基础型式在实际工程中有提升承载力的实用意义。在梅耶霍夫公式的基础上提出了适用于珊瑚砂的地基承载力修正公式,提高了珊瑚砂承载力计算结果的准确性。

关键词: 珊瑚砂, 地基承载力, 平板载荷室内模型试验, 基础尺寸效应, 修正公式

Abstract: Coral sand is a type of soil with special engineering properties. It is of great significance to study the bearing capacity of coral sand for construction of islands and reefs in the South China Sea. The influence of density and gradation of coral sand, shape and size of load plate on the bearing capacity of coral sand foundation were quantitatively studied by self-made indoor model device of plate load, and bearing capacities of coral sand and quartz sand were compared. Test results show that, compared with quartz sand with the same density, coral sand has prominent flat features and sharp edges and corners, which leads to an increase of internal friction angle and further leads to an increase of its bearing capacity. Settlement under the same load is much smaller than that of the former, and size effect of foundation on bearing capacity is obviously greater than that of quartz sand. However, dependence coefficient of stress level of coral sand foundation soil is linearly related to its relative density, and internal friction angle is significantly affected by gradation. Relationship between bearing capacity coefficient of foundation Nγ and internal friction angle ? is established. At the same time, the bearing capacity of coral sand foundation increases with the increase of load plate size, and the bearing capacity of coral sand foundation under square foundation is obviously higher than that of circular foundation with the same area, and size effect is more obvious, which shows that the foundation type has practical significance on improving the bearing capacity in practical engineering. Based on the Meyerhof formula, a modified formula of foundation bearing capacity for coral sand is also proposed, which improves the accuracy of calculation results of bearing capacity of coral sand.

Key words: coral sand, foundation bearing capacity, indoor model test of plate load, foundation size effect, modified formula

中图分类号: TU 411
[1] 胡丰慧, 方祥位, 申春妮, 王春艳, 邵生俊, . 真三轴条件下珊瑚砂颗粒破碎、强度和剪胀性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2147-2159.
[2] 秦悠, 龙慧, 吴琪, 庄海洋, 陈国兴. 复杂应力路径下饱和珊瑚砂孔压增长与刚度退化的阈值应变试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3441-3450.
[3] 刘璐, 李帅学, 张鑫磊, 高洪梅, 王志华, 肖杨. 微生物加固珊瑚砂动剪切模量与阻尼比特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3410-3420.
[4] 杨立. 平板载荷试验数值分析及承载力判定标准研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 723-730.
[5] 王步雪岩, 孟庆山, 钱建固, . 基于体积变化的珊瑚砂砾破碎率研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 1967-1975.
[6] 王新志, 黄鹏, 雷学文, 文东升, 丁浩桢, 刘铠诚, . 硫酸锌胶结珊瑚砂渗透特性试验及工程应用探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 2094-2104.
[7] 张小燕, 李吉, 蔡燕燕, 张晋勋, . 航油储罐珊瑚砂地基变形特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(12): 3738-3747.
[8] 黄鹏, 雷学文, 王新志, 沈建华, 丁浩桢, 文东升, . 间断级配珊瑚砂地基渗流侵蚀稳定性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(11): 3366-3377.
[9] 马成昊, 朱长歧, 瞿茹, 刘海峰, 王天民, 胡涛, . 中国南海珊瑚砂的多尺度颗粒形貌特征分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 117-126.
[10] 瞿茹, 朱长歧, 刘海峰, 王天民, 马成昊, 王星, . 珊瑚砂界限干密度确定方法的比较研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 461-475.
[11] 杨铮涛, 秦悠, 吴琪, 陈国兴, . 循环加载频率对饱和珊瑚砂液化特性的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(9): 2648-2656.
[12] 赵津桥, 丁选明, 刘汉龙, 欧强, 蒋春勇, . 珊瑚砂振冲密实加固响应室内模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(8): 2327-2336.
[13] 秦悠, 杜歆宇, 马维嘉, 吴琪, 陈国兴, . 不同循环应力路径下饱和珊瑚砂超静孔压增长的改进应力模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(6): 1729-1738.
[14] 张季如, 郑颜军, 彭伟珂, 王磊, 陈敬鑫. 填土应力路径下珊瑚砂幂律应力-应变模型的适用性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(5): 1309-1318.
[15] 骆赵刚, 丁选明, 欧强, 蒋春勇, 方华强, . 土工格栅加筋珊瑚砂的强度及变形特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(4): 1053-1064.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!