岩土力学 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (5): 1345-1354.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2020.1301

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

连续渗透边界下非饱和土竖井地基固结解析解

秦爱芳1,江良华1,许薇芳1,梅国雄2   

  1. 1. 上海大学 土木工程系,上海 200072;2. 南京工业大学 交通学院,江苏 南京 210029
  • 收稿日期:2020-08-27 修回日期:2021-01-04 出版日期:2021-05-11 发布日期:2021-05-08
  • 作者简介:秦爱芳,女,1966年生,博士,教授,主要研究方向为非饱和土固结、核废料地质处置。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(No. 42072292,No. 41372279)

Analytical solution to consolidation of unsaturated soil by vertical drains with continuous permeable boundary

QIN Ai-fang1, JIANG Liang-hua1, XU Wei-fang1, MEI Guo-xiong2   

  1. 1. Department of Civil Engineering, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200072, China; 2. School of Transportation Engineering, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210029, China
  • Received:2020-08-27 Revised:2021-01-04 Online:2021-05-11 Published:2021-05-08
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42072292, 41372279).

摘要: 基于非饱和土轴对称固结理论和等应变假设,引入连续渗透边界条件,采用边界条件齐次化、本征函数法,推导得到瞬时均布荷载下非饱和土竖井地基三维固结解析解。通过与双面完全渗透边界条件下已有解析解进行对比,验证了所得解析解的正确性。对所得解进行算例分析发现:通过设置合理上、下界面参数,所得解可用于模拟实际上、下边界透水透气任意分布的情况,弥补了目前无法考虑上、下边界渗透性介于渗透与不渗透之间或不对称分布的不足;在井径比及井深适当的前提下,当径、竖向渗透系数比大于2时,竖向渗流对于超孔隙压力消散的影响较小;当考虑竖向渗流时,上述影响随着上、下边界渗透性能的增强而愈加明显。

关键词: 非饱和土, 解析解, 连续渗透边界, 三维固结, 竖井

Abstract: In this paper, based on the axisymmetric consolidation theory of unsaturated soil and equal-strain assumption, an analytical solution using the homogenization of boundary conditions and eigenfunction method is proposed to three-dimensional consolidation of unsaturated soil enhanced by vertical drains under instantaneous loading, in which the continuous permeable boundary conditions are properly introduced. Then, the proposed solution is verified by the special cases of double drainage boundary conditions. Finally, the solution is analyzed using examples and the results show that the proposed solution can be used to simulate the arbitrary distribution of permeability of the top and bottom boundary by setting reasonable interface parameters, which makes up for the problem that the permeability of the top and bottom boundary is between pervious and impervious condition or follows an asymmetric distribution. In addition, with a proper ratio of influence radius to drainage well radius and appropriate depth of vertical drain, the influence of vertical flows on the dissipation of excess pore pressures is small when the ratio of radial to vertical permeability coefficient is greater than two. Last but not the least, the above influence of excess pore pressures is more obvious with the enhancement of the permeability of the top and bottom boundary considering the vertical flows.

Key words: unsaturated soil, analytical solution, continuous permeable boundary, three-dimensional consolidation, vertical drain

中图分类号: TU 431
[1] 郑晨, 白强强, 黄克起, 刘晓敏, 张强, 何晓佩, 宋立伟, . 黏土中竖井开挖诱发地层三维变形规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 335-342.
[2] 江文豪, 王浩, 廖光志, 陈滨华, . 时变降雨场景下双层非饱和土中水分一维瞬态渗流解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2721-2737.
[3] 方薇, 吴润丰, 周春梅, . 基于包络壳模型的非饱和土朗肯被动土压力[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2885-2893.
[4] 张振光, 徐杰, 范家燊, . 不排水条件下非饱和土球孔扩张的塑性新解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 1988-1996.
[5] 尚召伟, 孔令伟, 鄢俊彪, 高志傲, 王斐, 黎澄生, . 非饱和花岗岩残积土的小应变剪切模量特性与其持水特征曲线确定方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1131-1140.
[6] 周航, 汪义圣, 亓戈平, . 黏弹性土中异形桩横向动力响应半解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 761-774.
[7] 王浩, 侯泓冰, 江文豪, . 考虑根系对水文特性影响下非饱和植被土中水分一维瞬态渗流解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3329-3345.
[8] 张智卿, 刘鑫, 刘开富, 吴君涛, 吴文兵, . 横观各向同性土体中端承桩水平振动特性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3371-3382.
[9] 张基伟, 张佳鑫, 马文著, 贾红学, 吴卫东, 王传宝. 考虑锚杆滞后支护的竖井围岩加固力学模型半解析研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3395-3409.
[10] 张振光, 徐杰, 李海祥, . 考虑中间主应力的非饱和土竖井主动土压力滑移线解答[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3045-3053.
[11] 周禹良, 侯公羽, 李生生, 贺文, 杨雪, 赵庆儒, 黄佳铭, . 裂隙型类岩竖井注浆帷幕试样开挖卸荷响应试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 391-404.
[12] 叶云雪, 易博文, 刘小文, 吴珺华, 洪本根, . 脱湿路径下土体水分变化路径及体积变形对滤纸法测定土-水特征曲线的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2351-2361.
[13] 江学辉, 颜建伟, 罗文俊, 李佳宝, 徐长节. 纵向压力和加固钢板对隧道力学性能影响的解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1623-1632.
[14] 柳鸿博, 戴国亮, 周凤玺, 龚志宇, 陈智伟, . 黏弹性非饱和土中劲性复合桩纵向动力响应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(5): 1365-1377.
[15] 王亦炀, 李传勋, 李阔, 陆向综. 竖井地基大应变非线性固结解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(5): 1446-1456.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!