岩土力学 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (5): 1355-1362.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2020.1267

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

堆积体滑带土非饱和-饱和渗透特性试验研究

李跃1, 2,徐卫亚1, 3,易魁4,谢伟超2,张强5,孟庆祥1, 3   

  1. 1. 河海大学 岩土工程研究所,江苏 南京 210098;2. 滑铁卢大学 土木与环境学院,加拿大 安大略省; 3. 河海大学 岩土力学与堤坝工程教育部重点实验室,江苏 南京 210098;4. 华能澜沧江水电股份有限公司,云南 昆明 650214; 5. 中国水利水电科学研究院 岩土工程研究所,北京 100038
  • 收稿日期:2020-08-21 修回日期:2020-12-27 出版日期:2021-05-11 发布日期:2021-05-08
  • 通讯作者: 张强,男,1986年生,博士,高级工程师,主要从事复杂岩土介质多尺度灾变机制与数值模拟方面研究。E-mail: zhangq@iwhr.com E-mail:Yueh.Li@foxmail.com
  • 作者简介:李跃,男,1987年生,博士,主要从事复杂岩土工程灾害的防灾减灾研究
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金重点项目(No. 51939004);国家重点研发计划(No. 2017YFC1501100);国家自然科学基金(No. 11772118);华能集团公司重点科技项目(No. HNKJ18-H24)

Experimental study of unsaturated-saturated permeability characteristics of slip soil in landslide deposits

LI Yue1, 2, XU Wei-ya1, 3, YI Kui4, XIE Wei-chao2, ZHANG Qiang5, MENG Qing-xiang1, 3   

  1. 1. Research Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210098, China; 2. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada; 3. Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Embankment Engineering, Ministry of Education, Hohai University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210098, China; 4. Huaneng Lancang River Hydropower Inc., Kunming, Yunnan 650206, China; 5. Research Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Beijing 100038, China
  • Received:2020-08-21 Revised:2020-12-27 Online:2021-05-11 Published:2021-05-08
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Key Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (51939004), the National Key R & D Program of China (2017YFC1501100), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (11572344) and the Key Project of China Huaneng Group Science and Technology (HNKJ18-H24).

摘要: 我国西南地区水电工程近库坝区发育有大量的滑坡堆积体,这些堆积体在降雨、库水位升降等水动力条件下极易沿既有滑带产生变形和破坏。以澜沧江流域大华桥水电站大华滑坡为例,针对其滑带土开展了土-水特征曲线试验,分析了非饱和渗透过程的特性及演化规律,研究了不同围压和不同渗压条件下的饱和渗透特性。研究结果表明,采用VG模型可较好地描述大华滑带土的土-水特征曲线及其相对渗透系数的变化规律;通过饱和渗透试验分析发现,在相同条件下围压越大,滑带土的饱和渗透能力越弱,而渗压越大,饱和渗透能力越强,且滑带土饱和渗透表现出较强的非Darcy流特征,其渗透速度与水力坡降之间满足Forchheimer二项式关系,且当围压较低时,速度一次项对渗透的影响更显著。而随着围压增加,速度二次项逐步占据主导。

关键词: 堆积体滑带土, 非饱和-饱和渗透, 土-水特征曲线, 非Darcy渗流, 水动力型滑坡

Abstract: There are many landslide deposits in the reservoir and bank areas of hydropower projects in southwest China. These deposits are easy to deform and fail along the existing sliding zone under hydrodynamic conditions, such as rainfall and reservoir water fluctuation. The slip soil in Dahua landslide deposits which are located at the Dahuaqiao Hydropower Plant in the Lancang river basin of southwest China, was studied as an example. The experimental study was carried out to explore the soil-water characteristic curve (SWCC) of slip soil. The permeability characteristics and the evolution in the unsaturated seepage process were analyzed, and the saturated permeability characteristics under different confining pressures and seepage pressures were studied. The results indicated that the VG model could be used to describe the SWCC and the variation of relative permeability coefficient of Dahua slip soil. Through the saturated permeability test, it is found that under the same other conditions, the larger the confining pressure is, the weaker the saturated permeability of the slip soil is; while the larger the seepage pressure is, the stronger the saturated permeability is. Furthermore, the saturated permeability characteristics of the slip soil manifested a strong non-Darcy flow behavior, and the relationship between permeability velocity and hydraulic gradient satisfied the Forchheimer binomial model. When the confining pressure was low, the linear term coefficient of velocity had a more significant effect on the permeability, whereas the quadratic term coefficient of velocity gradually dominated in the seepage process with the increase of confining pressure.

Key words: slip soil in landslide deposits, unsaturated-saturated permeability, soil-water characteristic curve (SWCC), non-Darcy flow, hydrodynamic- induced landslide

中图分类号: TU 411
[1] 张高翔, 刘艳, 刘志强, . 土-水特征曲线的动态效应试验及模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 178-186.
[2] 周凤玺, 赵文沧. 基于土−水特征曲线的非饱和冻土未冻水含量预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2719-2727.
[3] 叶云雪, 易博文, 刘小文, 吴珺华, 洪本根, . 脱湿路径下土体水分变化路径及体积变形对滤纸法测定土-水特征曲线的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2351-2361.
[4] 马田田, 于海文, 韦昌富, 伊盼盼, 姚传芹, . 物理化学效应对膨胀土收缩特性的影响机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(3): 697-704.
[5] 张思奇, 裴华富, 谭道远, 朱鸿鹄, . 单、双孔隙结构非饱和黏土孔隙分布变化规律试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(2): 353-363.
[6] 张俊然, 宋陈雨, 姜彤, 王俪锦, 赵金玓, 熊潭清. 非饱和黄土高吸力下的水力力学特性及微观结构分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(8): 2229-2237.
[7] 文少杰, 郑文杰, 胡文乐, . 铅污染对黄土宏观持水性能和微观结构演化的影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(2): 451-460.
[8] 牛庚, 朱晓凤, 李俊星, 吕梦缘, 安荔琪, 陈子晗, . 宽广吸力范围非饱和土剪切强度试验研究及其预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(12): 3349-3359.
[9] 栾纪元, 王冀鹏. 基于4D显微成像的非饱和颗粒土微观力学与渗流试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(11): 3252-3260.
[10] 李旭, 刘阿强, 刘丽, 刘艳, 吴永康. 全吸力范围内土-水特征曲线的快速测定方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(2): 299-306.
[11] 谌文武, 贾全全, 童艳梅. 莫高窟壁画地仗土-水特征曲线的测定与拟合[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1483-1491.
[12] 陈仁朋, 王朋飞, 刘鹏, 程威, 康馨, 杨微, . 路基煤矸石填料土-水特征曲线试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 372-378.
[13] 陶高梁, 吴小康, 甘世朝, 肖衡林, 马 强, 罗晨晨, . 不同初始孔隙比下非饱和黏土渗透性 试验研究及模型预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1761-1770.
[14] 郑国锋, 郭晓霞, 邵龙潭, . 基于状态曲面的非饱和土强度准则及其验证[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1441-1448.
[15] 李明玉, 孙文静. 黏土掺入生物炭后的持水特性及其影响机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4722-4730.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!