岩土力学 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (6): 1648-1658.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2020.1805

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

接缝密封材料对缓冲砌块屏障封闭性能的影响

王英1, 2,张虎元1,童艳梅1,周光平1   

  1. 1. 兰州大学 土木工程与力学学院,甘肃 兰州 730000;2. 兰州理工大学 土木工程学院,甘肃 兰州 730050
  • 收稿日期:2020-12-03 修回日期:2021-03-10 出版日期:2021-06-11 发布日期:2021-06-15
  • 通讯作者: 张虎元,男,1963年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事与废弃物处置有关的环境岩土工程方面的研究工作。 E-mail: zhanghuyuan@lzu.edu.cn E-mail: ywang16@lzu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:王英,女,1986年生,博士研究生,主要从事岩土工程方面的研究工作
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.41972265)。

Influence of joint sealing material on the sealing performance of the buffer block barrier

WANG Ying1, 2, ZHANG Hu-yuan1, TONG Yan-mei1, ZHOU Guang-ping1   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering and Mechanics, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, China; 2. School of Civil Engineering, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou, Gansu 730050, China
  • Received:2020-12-03 Revised:2021-03-10 Online:2021-06-11 Published:2021-06-15
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(41972265).

摘要: 室内制备模拟压实砌块,分别采用膨润土粉末、膨润土泥浆以及微粒膨润土(高密度膨润土颗粒与粉末的混合物)对砌块接缝进行密封,通过室内模拟渗透试验对砌块的膨胀、渗透性能进行研究,并借助X-CT扫描试验、热传导试验以及微观结构分析对砌块接缝的密封程度进行评价。试验结果表明:随着水化时长的增加,砌块核心区膨润土向接缝区孔隙侵入,接缝区膨胀力快速发展,导致砌块轴向膨胀应力的发展速度减缓,产生滞后现象;接缝密封材料类型对砌块体系的水化进程影响显著,膨胀应力发展速率存在差异;接缝的愈合程度与接缝充填材料的初始干密度呈正相关。CT扫描图像表明:水化结束后,密封接缝与砌块已基本“焊接”在一起,而未进行密封的砌块之间仍然存在间隙,并未完全封闭。相较于完整试样,密封接缝区土样的集合体间孔隙尺寸分布范围扩大(3~30 μm),泥浆密封试样接缝区土样结构疏松,出现100~500 μm的大孔隙,而干缝试样的接缝区则存在多条体积较大的裂隙状二维孔隙。密封可以显著提高砌块体系的各向膨胀能力,改善愈合砌块体系的均质性,密封后的砌块体系抗渗性能以及热传导性能与完整样接近,接缝的不利影响弱化。综合来看,采用微粒膨润土对砌块接缝进行密封,接缝的愈合度最高,砌块的各项工程性能最佳,其次为采用膨润土粉末以及膨润土泥浆进行密封的试样,未进行密封处理的干缝试样愈合效果最差。

关键词: 高放废物, 膨润土砌块, 接缝, 密封材料, 膨胀力, 渗透系数

Abstract: An indoor permeability test was conducted to study the sealing performance of joints between the compacted blocks which were backfilled with bentonite powder (P), bentonite particle-powder mixture (P/P) and bentonite slurry (S), respectively. The swelling stress and hydraulic conductivity were monitored during the permeability test. After the test, the homogenization of blocks and sealing degree of joints were evaluated according to the X-CT scanning test, thermal conductivity test and microstructure test. The results show that: with the increase of hydration time, the bentonite in the core area of the block intrudes into the pores of the joint, and the increase rate of swelling stress in the joint zone is higher than that in the axial direction of the block, which leads to the slowing down of the development speed of the axial swelling stress of the block and produces hysteresis. The joint sealing materials have significant influence on the hydration process of the block system, resulting different swelling stress development rates. The sealing degree of the joint is positively correlated with the initial dry density of the joint filling material. The X-CT scanning images show that the sealing joint and the block have been "welded" together after hydration. By contrast, there is still a gap between the blocks with a blank joint, showing a lower sealing degree. The MIP and SEM tests demonstrate that the pore size distribution of inter-aggregates in the joint area lies in the proportion between 3 μm and 30 μm, and a certain number of large pores with a diameter between 100 μm and 500 μm were observed in the joints sealed with bentonite slurry. Some fissure-like 2-dimensional pores appeared in the blank joint according to the SEM picture. Generally, sealing can significantly improve the expansion ability and homogeneity of the block system, and the impermeability and thermal conductivity of the healing block system are close to that of the intact sample. Joint backfilled with bentonite particle-powder mixture shows a better sealing performance, followed by the joint sealed with bentonite powder and bentonite slurry, and the sealing effect of joint without backfilling is the worst.

Key words: high-level radioactive waste, bentonite block, joint, sealing materials, swelling pressure, permeability

中图分类号: TU411
[1] 张兴文, 曹净, 雷舒羽, 李育红, 程芸, 张柠锐, . 富里酸环境对含腐殖酸水泥土结构及渗透性影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 249-261.
[2] 曹瑞栋, 刘斯宏, 田金博, 鲁洋, 张勇敢, 李帆, . 考虑拉伸的土工袋体织物渗流特性试验及预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2711-2720.
[3] 张奇, 王驹, 刘江峰, 曹胜飞, 谢敬礼, 成建峰, . 热-水-力多场耦合下高放废物处置库核心处置单元间距设计研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2626-2638.
[4] 霍亮, 王贵宾, 邬书良, 张修香, 黄志国, 吴志春, . 基于混合Fisher分布的随机结构面产状聚类模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2211-2223.
[5] 刘文林, 鄂天龙, 冯杨州, 牛松荧, 张子堂, 孙熠, 陈宏信, . 纳米改性地聚合物隔离墙材料基本工程特性及冻融循环耐久性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2039-2048.
[6] 王小刚, 杨建平, 陈卫忠, 李慧, . 盾构隧道结构响应特征及接缝刚度分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 485-495.
[7] 郑思维, 胡明鉴, 霍玉龙, . 钙质砂渗透性影响因素及预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 217-224.
[8] 李晓龙, 赵泽鑫, 陈坤洋, 马鹏, 陈灿, 钟燕辉, 张蓓, . 考虑化学反应的高聚物压密劈裂注浆仿真研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2823-2838.
[9] 崔允亮, 潘方然, 高楥园, 金子原, . 真空预压淤堵区渗透系数的计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 2085-2093.
[10] 王新志, 黄鹏, 雷学文, 文东升, 丁浩桢, 刘铠诚, . 硫酸锌胶结珊瑚砂渗透特性试验及工程应用探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 2094-2104.
[11] 李品良, 许强, 刘佳良, 何攀, 纪续, 陈婉琳, 彭大雷, . 盐分影响重塑黄土渗透性的微观机制试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 504-512.
[12] 吴广水, 田慧会, 郝丰富, 王书齐, 杨文洲, 祝婷梅, . 基于核磁共振T2时间分布快速预测不同干密度土体的渗透系数[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 513-520.
[13] 蔚立元, 杨瀚清, 王晓琳, 刘日成, 王蓥森. 循环剪切作用下三维粗糙裂隙非线性渗流特性数值模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(9): 2757-2766.
[14] 张宇, 何想, 路桦铭, 马国梁, 刘汉龙, 肖杨, . 微生物-膨润土联合矿化防渗模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(8): 2337-2349.
[15] 谢家冲, 黄昕, 金国龙, 张子新, . 局部水力交互下盾构隧道渗流与力学响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(4): 1179-1189.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!