岩土力学 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (7): 1828-1838.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2020.1649

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

考虑真空加载过程及堆载随时间变化下 砂井地基的普遍固结解析解

林伟岸，江文豪，詹良通   

  1. 浙江大学 软弱土与环境土工教育部重点实验室，浙江 杭州 310058
  • 收稿日期:2020-11-04 修回日期:2021-02-05 出版日期:2021-07-12 发布日期:2021-07-15
  • 通讯作者: 江文豪，男，1996年生，硕士研究生，主要从事软土地基处理的研究。E-mail: 21812025@zju.edu.cn E-mail:linweian@zju.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:林伟岸，男，1981年生，博士，主要从事环境岩土、软土地基处理及土力学试验的研究和教学工作
  • 基金资助:
    浙江省重点研发计划项目（No. 2019C03107）。

General analytical solution for consolidation of sand-drained foundation considering the vacuum loading process and the time-dependent surcharge loading

LIN Wei-an, JIANG Wen-hao, ZHAN Liang-tong   

  1. MOE Key Laboratory of Soft Soils and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310058, China
  • Received:2020-11-04 Revised:2021-02-05 Online:2021-07-12 Published:2021-07-15
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by Key Research and Development Program of Zhejiang Province (2019C03107).

PDF (Chinese)

303

PDF (English)

20

摘要： 基于Barron砂井地基等应变固结理论，考虑了真空加载过程及堆载随时间变化，同时还考虑了真空压力沿深度及径向的衰减、砂井的涂抹效应及竖向渗流等因素，推导建立了真空联合堆载预压下砂井地基的固结控制方程，并求解得到了一个较为普遍的固结解析解。通过将退化解析解与已有的解析解及文中解析解与有限差分解分别进行对比，验证了解答的正确性。基于解析解，分析了砂井地基的固结性状。分析表明：砂井地基的固结速率随真空加载因子? 的增大而增大，但当? 增大到一定程度时，真空加载过程对砂井地基固结速率的影响可以忽略；随着负压衰减系数k1和k2的增大，砂井地基的固结速率发生减小；砂井地基的固结速率随真空压力p0的增大而减小，随最终堆载qu的增大而增大；随着加载时间Th1的增大，砂井地基的固结速率逐渐减小，堆载为瞬时加载下的固结速率最快。

关键词: 真空加载过程, 堆载, 真空联合堆载预压, 砂井地基, 普遍解析解

Abstract: Based on Barron’s equal strain consolidation theory, the consolidation governing equation of sand-drained foundation under vacuum combined surcharge preloading is derived and a general analytical solution is obtained, which considers the vacuum loading process, the time-dependent surcharge loading, the characteristics of the vacuum pressure decreasing along the depth and radial direction, and the well resistance of vertical drains and the vertical flow. The correctness of the analytical solution proposed in this paper is verified by comparing the degenerate analytical solution with the existing analytical solution and the finite difference solution. Based on the analytical solution, the consolidation behaviors of sand-drained foundation are analyzed. The analysis shows that the consolidation rate of sand-drained foundation is accelerated with the increase of vacuum loading factor ?. However, when ? increases to a certain extent, the influence of vacuum loading process on the consolidation rate of sand-drained foundation can be ignored. The consolidation rate of sand-drained foundation decreases with the increase of vacuum pressure attenuation coefficient k1 and k2. The consolidation rate of sand-drained foundation decreases with the increase of vacuum pressure p0 and increases with the increase of final surcharge loading qu. With the increase of loading time Th1, the consolidation rate of sand-drained foundation decreases gradually, and the consolidation rate is the largest under instantaneous surcharge loading.

Key words: vacuum loading process, surcharge loading, vacuum combined surcharge preloading, sand-drained foundation, general analytical solution

中图分类号: TU 472
[1] 李双龙, 魏丽敏, 冯胜洋, 何群, 张开鑫, . 基于扩展Koppejan模型的被动桩−软土 时效性相互作用研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(9): 2602-2614.
[2] 邓涛, 许杰, 郑嘉勇, 郑路. 深厚软土中抗滑桩的修正悬臂桩计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(5): 1299-1305.
[3] 江文豪, 詹良通. 考虑井阻效应及径向渗透系数变化下砂井 地基的大变形固结[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(3): 755-766.
[4] 涂园, 王奎华, 周建, 胡安峰, . 有效应力法和有效固结压力法在预压地基 强度计算中的应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 645-654.
[5] 魏焕卫，孙 川，王建强，李 瑜，刘 聪，张 伟，. 堆载下桩+地下墙水平承载组合基础模型试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 203-210.
[6] 康 成, 梅国雄, 梁荣柱, 吴文兵, 方宇翔, 柯宅邦, . 地表临时堆载诱发下既有盾构隧道纵向变形分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(12): 4605-4616.
[7] 蔡 强，李乾坤，石胜伟，张 勇, . 钢管抗滑短桩受力特性物理模型试验研究[J]. , 2016, 37(S2): 679-684.
[8] 李小娟，陈雪奖，戴国亮，龚维明,. 黏性土中钻孔灌注桩自平衡转换系数取值研究[J]. , 2016, 37(S1): 226-232.
[9] 叶观宝 ，张晴雯 ，张 振 , . 真空联合堆载预压下混凝土芯砂石桩复合地基固结特性理论分析[J]. , 2016, 37(12): 3356-3364.
[10] 蒋建清 ，曹国辉 ，刘热强,. 排水板和砂井联合堆载预压加固海相软土地基的工作性状的现场试验[J]. , 2015, 36(S2): 551-558.
[11] 刘春原，朱 楠，赵献辉，王文静. 湖泊相软土真空堆载联合预压法的离心机试验研究[J]. , 2015, 36(S1): 310-314.
[12] 邓会元，戴国亮，龚维明，朱中发. 不同平衡堆载条件下桩基承载特性的原位试验研究[J]. , 2015, 36(11): 3063-3070.
[13] 冯昌明 ，木林隆 ,孙志伟 ，王耀忠，. 基于两阶段法的堆载对公路桥梁桩基础影响分析[J]. , 2014, 35(S2): 528-534.
[14] 张福海 ，陈 雷 ，郭帅杰 ，任朋勋 , . 底部抽真空预压法砂井地基固结解析解[J]. , 2014, 35(10): 2787-2793.
[15] 李志伟. 软土地基邻近堆载对桥梁桩基偏位的影响研究[J]. , 2013, 34(12): 3594-3600.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 《岩土力学》编辑部
地址：湖北武汉武昌小洪山中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所(430071)　邮编：200042　电话：027-87198484　E-mail: ytlx@whrsm.ac.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发