岩土力学 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (8): 2120-2126.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.0001

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于粒子图像测速技术的黄土径向劈裂试验研究

姜彤,翟天雅,张俊然,赵金玓,王俪锦,宋陈雨,潘旭威   

  1. 华北水利水电大学 河南省岩土力学与结构工程重点实验室,河南 郑州 450046
  • 收稿日期:2021-01-03 修回日期:2021-03-10 出版日期:2021-08-11 发布日期:2021-08-16
  • 通讯作者: 张俊然,男,1984年生,博士,副教授,主要从特殊土与非饱和土工程性质方面的研究。E-mail: zhangjunran@ncwu.edu.cn E-mail:jiangtong@ncwu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:姜彤,男,1973年生,博士,教授,主要从事岩土力学及地学信息方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    河南省高等学校青年骨干教师培养计划项目(No. 2020GGJS-094);河南省高等学校重点科研项目(No. 21A410002);国家自然科学基金(No. 41602295)。

Diametric splitting tests on loess based on particle image velocimetry technique

JIANG Tong, ZHAI Tian-ya, ZHANG Jun-ran, ZHAO Jin-di, WANG Li-jin, SONG Chen-yu, PAN Xu-wei   

  1. Henan Province Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Structural Engineering, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou, Henan 450046, China
  • Received:2021-01-03 Revised:2021-03-10 Online:2021-08-11 Published:2021-08-16
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Foundation for University Key Teacher by the Ministry of Education of Henan Province (2020GGJS-094), the Key Scientific Research Projects of Colleges and Universities in Henan Province (21A410002) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41602295).

摘要: 用粒子图像测速(PIV)测试系统对黄土原状样和重塑样进行了一系列劈裂试验,同时用压汞仪对黄土原状样和重塑样进行了微观结构定量对比分析,探讨结构性、初始干密度对抗拉强度的影响。试验结果表明:当试样劈裂破坏时,原状样峰值荷载比重塑样的大,重塑样的峰值荷载随着初始干密度的增加而增加。由位移矢量场可知,原状样劈裂破坏时主裂隙倾斜,次生裂隙不发育;重塑样劈裂破坏时主裂隙呈径向垂直,次生裂隙较发育;不同初始干密度重塑样的裂隙发育形态基本一致。当初始干密度相等时,原状样的累计汞压入量曲线和孔径分布密度曲线均高于重塑样,原状样的集聚体间孔隙比重塑样的多,但由于原状样具有明显的结构性,因而原状样的抗拉强度比重塑样的高。随着初始干密度增加,重塑样的累计汞压入量曲线向下移动,孔径分布密度曲线峰值向左移动,集聚体间孔隙逐渐减小甚至消失,导致抗拉强度随着初始干密度增大而增加。

关键词: 原状黄土, 抗拉强度, 位移矢量场, 裂隙, 压汞

Abstract: A series of splitting tests was carried out on the intact and remolded loess specimens by particle image velocimetry (PIV) test system, and the microstructure of the intact and remolded loess specimens were quantitatively analyzed by mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP), so as to discuss the influence of the structure and initial dry density on the tensile strength. The test results show that the peak load of the intact specimens is bigger than that of the remolded specimens when the specimens splitting failure. The peak load of the remolded specimens increases with increasing initial dry density. The displacement vector field shows that the primary cracks incline and the secondary cracks do not develop during the split failure of the loess specimens. When the remolded specimens split, the primary cracks are radially vertical, the secondary cracks more develop, and the crack morphology of the remolded specimens with different initial dry densities is basically the same. For the equal initial dry density, the cumulative intruded porosimetry volume curve and pore diameter distribution density curve of the intact specimen are both higher than those of the remolded specimen, and the inter-aggregate pores of the intact specimen are more than those of the remolded specimen. However, due to the obvious structure, the tensile strength of the intact specimen is higher than that of the remolded specimen. As the initial dry density increases, the cumulative intruded porosimetry volume curve of the remolded specimen moves downward, and the peak of the pore distribution density curve moves to the left. The inter-aggregate pores gradually decrease or even disappear. As a result, the tensile strength increases with increasing initial dry density.

Key words: intact loess, tensile strength, displacement vector field, crack, mercury intrusion

中图分类号: TU 431
[1] 苗日成, 唐贝, 祁飞, 江志安, 崔溦, . 随机裂隙岩体滚刀破岩过程离散元模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 541-552.
[2] 李槟, 申海萌, 李琦, 李霞颖, . 不同围压条件下花岗岩剪切过程渗透率动态演化规律数值模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 437-453.
[3] 刘一鸣, 李振, 冯国瑞, 杨鹏, 白锦文, 黄炳雄, 李东, . 循环加卸载下裂隙砂岩声−热响应特征及前兆规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2773-2791.
[4] 王昕琪, 冯子军, 陈正男, 高祺, 阴伟涛, 靳佩桦, 李玉彬, . 超临界水作用下花岗岩裂隙渗流特性演化规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2847-2858.
[5] 王邺, 王述红, 张泽, 韩博文, 杨润生, . 裂隙及水幕影响下的水封洞库油品运移范围研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2907-2928.
[6] 王炳文, 刘臣毅, 康明超, 李乾龙, 杨雷, 周森林, 钱垒. 考虑应力的非闭合裂隙岩体损伤机制及裂纹扩展研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2409-2420.
[7] 李林, 季良, 叶飞, 李尧, . 非饱和原状结构性黄土水-力耦合弹塑性本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2421-2433.
[8] 高帅, 任富强, 常远. 预制单裂隙砂岩注浆过程中的浆液流动特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2505-2515.
[9] 熊飞, 刘新荣, 刘文武, 钟祖良, 杨忠平, 王南云, 王浩, 薛熠, . 含深大裂隙陡崖式岩溶山体采动破坏与失稳机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2516-2531.
[10] 孙闯, 蒲云波, 敖云鹤, 陶琦, . 冻融饱水裂隙砂岩力学特性及细观破裂演化特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2339-2352.
[11] 雷瑞德, 顾清恒, 胡超, 贺培, 周林森, . 裂隙砂岩声发射信号特征及破裂前兆识别研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2023-2038.
[12] 姜海波, 卢燕, 李琳, 张军, . 干湿-冻融作用输水渠道膨胀土强度特性及损伤演化规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1356-1367.
[13] 欧阳淼, 张红日, 王桂尧, 邓人睿, 郭鸥, 汪磊, 高游, . 基于响应面法的生物基质改良膨胀土配比优化研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1368-1378.
[14] 王刚, 王恩茂, 隆清明, 徐浩, 陈雪畅, 刘昆轮, . 考虑滤失效应的煤层水力压裂与裂隙扩展关系研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1071-1083.
[15] 申林方, 华涛, 王志良, 李松波, 陈骞. 参数空间变异性对岩石水力压裂裂隙扩展形态的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1294-1302.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!