岩土力学 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (10): 2726-2734.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.2037

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

波动水力条件下土体内侵蚀特性的 透明土试验研究

邓泽之1, 2,吉恩跃1,王刚2   

  1. 1. 南京水利科学研究院 水利部土石坝破坏机理与防控技术重点实验室,江苏 南京 210024;2. 重庆大学 土木工程学院,重庆 400044
  • 收稿日期:2021-12-03 修回日期:2022-06-23 出版日期:2022-10-19 发布日期:2022-10-17
  • 通讯作者: 王刚,男,1978年生,博士,教授,主要从事土动力学、高坝大型结构和岩土工程数值分析方面的研究工作。E-mail: cewanggang@163.com E-mail:672012420@qq.com
  • 作者简介:邓泽之,男,1996年生,博士研究生,主要从事粗粒土渗透破坏研究。
  • 基金资助:
    水利部土石坝破坏机理与防控技术重点实验室开放研究基金(No. YK321005);重庆市研究生科研创新项目(No. CYS20021);重庆市自然科学基金(No. cstc2021 jcyj-msxmX0598)。

Experimental study on internal erosion behaviors under fluctuating hydraulic condition using transparent soil

DENG Ze-zhi1, 2, JI En-yue1, WANG Gang2   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Failure Mechanism and Safety Control Techniques of Earth-Rock Dam of the Ministry of Water Resources, Nanjing Hydraulic Research Institute, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210024, China; 2. School of Civil Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China
  • Received:2021-12-03 Revised:2022-06-23 Online:2022-10-19 Published:2022-10-17
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Open Research Fund of Key Laboratory of Failure Mechanism and Safety Control Techniques of Earth-Rock Dam of the Ministry of Water Resources (YK321005), the Graduate Scientific Research and Innovation Foundation of Chongqing, China (CYS20021) and the Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing (cstc2021 jcyj-msxmX0598).

摘要: 在渗流作用下土中细粒随着水流在粗粒骨架间运移的现象被称为内侵蚀。以往对于内侵蚀的研究主要集中在恒定的水力梯度下,缺乏对于波动水力条件下内侵蚀发展特征和细观机制的认识。设计了透明土渗流试验装置,开展了恒定和波动水力条件下不同内部稳定性土体的渗流试验,以探究波动水力条件下内侵蚀的发展特征。宏观试验现象表明,对于内部稳定性较差型土,当水力梯度达到临界水力梯度后,波动水力条件下的渗透系数比恒定水力条件下呈现出更快的增长趋势,说明水力波动会加剧细颗粒的迁移和流失。为了进一步揭示波动水力条件加剧土体内侵蚀发展过程的细观机制,利用一种基于平面激光扫描的二维截面图像开发的土体细观组构三维重建方法,建立了粗粒骨架、内部孔隙通道和细颗粒的三维可视化数字模型。通过观察细粒在孔隙通道中的分布情况,发现恒定水力条件下,细粒在运移至狭窄的孔隙喉道处时会发生堵塞堆积现象;而波动水力条件下的水流扰动会破坏这种暂稳态的堵塞堆积结构,继而重启细颗粒的迁移过程。

关键词: 内侵蚀, 水力条件, 透明土, 三维重建, 细观机制

Abstract: Internal erosion is a phenomenon that fine particles migrate through the channels within coarse matrix under seepage flow. Previous studies mainly focused on the internal erosion under steady hydraulic gradient, while the behavior and mesoscopic mechanism of internal erosion under fluctuating hydraulic condition were paid little attention. In this study, a setup of transparent soil seepage test was developed. Seepage tests of two kinds of soils with different internal stabilities were conducted under steady and fluctuating hydraulic conditions respectively to investigate the internal erosion behaviors under fluctuating hydraulic condition. The macroscopic experimental phenomenon showed that, when the hydraulic gradient exceeded the critical hydraulic gradient, the increase of the hydraulic conductivity under fluctuating hydraulic condition was faster than that under steady hydraulic condition for internally unstable soil, manifesting that hydraulic fluctuation aggravated the migration of fines. In order to further reveal the mesoscopic mechanism, a three-dimensional reconstruction method was employed to rebuild the mesoscopic fabric of soil based on the two-dimensional cross-sectional images obtained by the planar laser scanning; and a three-dimensional visualization digital model including coarse matrix, inter-granular pore channels and fine particles was established. By observing the distribution of fine particles in pore channels, it was found that fine particles might clog and accumulate at narrow pore throats under steady seepage. While the perturbation caused by hydraulic fluctuation could break these weak stable structures of clog and accumulation, and then restart the migration process of fine particles.

Key words: internal erosion, hydraulic condition, transparent soil, 3D reconstruction, mesoscopic mechanism

中图分类号: TU 411.4
[1] 任富强, 谷金泽, 孙博, 常远, . 含不同孔洞类岩石材料的动力响应机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 654-664.
[2] 李文炜, 占鑫杰, 王保田, 朱群峰, 许小龙, 左晋宇, 王家辉, . 冲击碾压加固松散堰塞坝料的细观机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(8): 2297-2307.
[3] 马国良, 陈曦, 范超男, 葛少成. 不同水力荷载路径下煤体微观渗流特征及宏观破坏研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(6): 1779-1788.
[4] 王思远, 蒋明镜, 李承超, 张旭东, . 三轴剪切条件下胶结型深海能源土应变局部化离散元模拟分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(11): 3307-3317.
[5] 邓泽之, 王刚, 金伟. 考虑水力波动作用的潜蚀本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(10): 2921-2928.
[6] 郭凯丰, 张仪萍. 双层地基中气体聚集与土体变形机制的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(1): 99-108.
[7] 阙云, 翁斌, 蔡松林, LIU Jin-yuan, . 非饱和透明土优先流迁移规律分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(4): 857-867.
[8] 赵红华, 刘聪, 唐小微, 魏焕卫, 朱丰, . 基于透明土和三维重构技术的空间变形可视 化测量系统的研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(9): 3170-3180.
[9] 张传庆, 刘振江, 张春生, 周辉, 高阳, 侯靖, . 隐晶质玄武岩破裂演化及破坏特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2487-2496.
[10] 周东, 刘汉龙, 仉文岗, 丁选明, 杨昌友, . 被动桩侧土体位移场的透明土模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2686-2694.
[11] 李晓照, 戚承志, 邵珠山, 屈小磊, . 基于细观力学脆性岩石剪切特性演化模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1358-1367.
[12] 周航, 袁井荣, 刘汉龙, 楚剑, . 矩形桩沉桩挤土效应透明土模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4429-4438.
[13] 孔纲强,李 辉,王忠涛,文 磊,. 透明砂土与天然砂土动力特性对比[J]. , 2018, 39(6): 1935-1940.
[14] 刘嘉英,马 刚,周 伟,常晓林, . 抗转动特性对颗粒材料分散性失稳的影响研究[J]. , 2017, 38(5): 1472-1480.
[15] 常 艳,雷振坤,赵红华,于绅坤, . 熔融石英粒径对透明土位移测量精度的影响[J]. , 2017, 38(2): 493-500.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!