岩土力学 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (11): 3209-3219.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2022.0004

• 测试技术 • 上一篇    

全吸力范围内渗透系数快速测定方法研究

刘阿强,李旭,刘艳,张志远   

  1. 北京交通大学 城市地下工程教育部重点实验室,北京 100044
  • 收稿日期:2022-01-05 修回日期:2022-07-13 出版日期:2022-11-11 发布日期:2022-12-02
  • 通讯作者: 李旭,男,1980年生,博士,教授,主要从事特殊土力学、计算岩土力学、机器学习在岩土工程应用等方面的研究。E-mail: xuli@bjtu.edu.cn E-mail:19125866@bjtu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:刘阿强,男,1996年生,硕士研究生,主要从事非饱和土渗流方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 51979002);北京市自然科学基金(No. 8192034)。

A rapid determination method of hydraulic conductivity in full suction range

LIU A-qiang, LI Xu, LIU Yan, ZHANG Zhi-yuan   

  1. Key Laboratory of Urban Underground Engineering of Ministry of Education, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China
  • Received:2022-01-05 Revised:2022-07-13 Online:2022-11-11 Published:2022-12-02
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51979002) and Beijing Natural Science Foundation (8192034).

摘要:

非饱和土渗透系数函数跨越多个数量级,传统的测量方法动辄耗时数月,且难以实现全吸力范围内渗透系数的测量。为了实现全吸力范围内渗透系数的快速测量,将湿润锋前进法与瞬时剖面法相结合(简称联合测定方法),利用自行研制的土柱入渗装置,开展了不同干密度条件下青海粉质黏土全吸力范围内渗透系数测量试验。试验结果表明:在联合测定方法中,湿润锋前进法适用于高吸力段(基质吸力ψ > 25 kPa)渗透系数的测量,瞬时剖面法则适用于低吸力段(基质吸力ψ ≤25 kPa)渗透系数的测量,且两种方法在吸力重叠范围内渗透系数测量结果基本一致。联合测定方法可将全吸力范围内渗透系数的测量时长压缩至一周左右,且精度良好。此外,还对两种试验方法的误差来源进行了分析与讨论。研究结果表明:联合测定方法能够实现全吸力范围内渗透系数的快速测量,有望使得非饱和土渗透系数的测量成为土力学的常规试验。

关键词: 全吸力范围, 快速测定, 渗透系数, 湿润锋前进法, 瞬时剖面法

Abstract:

The hydraulic conductivity function of unsaturated soil spans several orders of magnitude. Traditional measurement methods often take several months, and it is difficult to measure the hydraulic conductivity in the full suction range. In order to realize the rapid measurement of hydraulic conductivity in the full suction range, the wetting front advancing method is combined with the instantaneous profile method (here referred to as the combined determination method) in this study. A self-developed soil column infiltration device was used to measure the hydraulic conductivity of Qinghai silty clay in the full suction range under different dry densities. The test results show that in the combined determination method, the wetting front advancing method is suitable for the measurement of hydraulic conductivity in the high suction range (ψ > 25 kPa), while the instantaneous profile method is suitable for measuring the hydraulic conductivity in the low suction range (ψ ≤25 kPa). The hydraulic conductivity determined by the two methods in the overlapped suction range is basically consistent. The combined determination method can reduce the measurement time of hydraulic conductivity in the full suction range by about one week with good accuracy. In addition, the error sources of the two measurement methods are also analyzed and discussed in this work. The results show that the combined determination method can realize the rapid measurement of hydraulic conductivity in the full suction range, which is expected to make the measurement of the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soil become a routine test in soil mechanics.

Key words: ull suction range, rapid determination, hydraulic conductivity, wetting front advancing method, instantaneous profile method

中图分类号: TU 411
[1] 张兴文, 曹净, 雷舒羽, 李育红, 程芸, 张柠锐, . 富里酸环境对含腐殖酸水泥土结构及渗透性影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 249-261.
[2] 曹瑞栋, 刘斯宏, 田金博, 鲁洋, 张勇敢, 李帆, . 考虑拉伸的土工袋体织物渗流特性试验及预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2711-2720.
[3] 刘文林, 鄂天龙, 冯杨州, 牛松荧, 张子堂, 孙熠, 陈宏信, . 纳米改性地聚合物隔离墙材料基本工程特性及冻融循环耐久性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2039-2048.
[4] 郑思维, 胡明鉴, 霍玉龙, . 钙质砂渗透性影响因素及预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 217-224.
[5] 崔允亮, 潘方然, 高楥园, 金子原, . 真空预压淤堵区渗透系数的计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 2085-2093.
[6] 王新志, 黄鹏, 雷学文, 文东升, 丁浩桢, 刘铠诚, . 硫酸锌胶结珊瑚砂渗透特性试验及工程应用探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 2094-2104.
[7] 李品良, 许强, 刘佳良, 何攀, 纪续, 陈婉琳, 彭大雷, . 盐分影响重塑黄土渗透性的微观机制试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 504-512.
[8] 吴广水, 田慧会, 郝丰富, 王书齐, 杨文洲, 祝婷梅, . 基于核磁共振T2时间分布快速预测不同干密度土体的渗透系数[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 513-520.
[9] 蔚立元, 杨瀚清, 王晓琳, 刘日成, 王蓥森. 循环剪切作用下三维粗糙裂隙非线性渗流特性数值模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(9): 2757-2766.
[10] 张宇, 何想, 路桦铭, 马国梁, 刘汉龙, 肖杨, . 微生物-膨润土联合矿化防渗模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(8): 2337-2349.
[11] 文少杰, 郑文杰, 胡文乐, . 铅污染对黄土宏观持水性能和微观结构演化的影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(2): 451-460.
[12] 刘宜昭, 陆阳, 刘松玉, . 重金属作用下改性水泥系隔离墙化学相容性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(2): 497-506.
[13] 郑思维, 胡明鉴, 霍玉龙, 黎宇, . 盐溶液环境下钙质砂渗透性影响因素分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(12): 3522-3530.
[14] 贺桂成, 唐孟媛, 李咏梅, 李春光, 张志军, 伍玲玲. 改性黄麻纤维联合微生物胶结铀尾砂的抗渗性能试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(12): 3459-3470.
[15] 侯娟, 张金榜, 孙银玉, 孙瑞, 刘飞禹. 颗粒膨胀对膨润土复合衬垫防渗性能的影响及 介观机制分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(10): 3039-3048.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!