岩土力学 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (12): 3484-3492.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2022.0912

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

考虑非饱和浸润区的改进Green-Ampt模型

李强1, 2,贾森1, 2,李鑫1, 2,武璧泽1, 2,尚艳亮3,董俊4   

  1. 1. 石家庄铁道大学 土木工程学院,河北 石家庄 050043; 2. 石家庄铁道大学 道路与铁道工程安全保障省部共建教育部重点实验室,河北 石家庄 050043; 3. 石家庄铁路职业技术学院 铁道工程系,河北 石家庄 050041; 4. 中铁第四勘察设计院集团有限公司,湖北 武汉 430063
  • 收稿日期:2022-06-16 修回日期:2022-09-22 出版日期:2022-12-28 发布日期:2023-01-05
  • 通讯作者: 李鑫,男,1989年生,博士,讲师,主要从事岩土体渗流及其环境效应方面的研究。E-mail: xinli@stdu.edu.cn E-mail:anuoli@163.com
  • 作者简介:李强,男,1979年生,博士,教授,主要从事岩土渗流理论及应用研究方面的工作。
  • 基金资助:
    河北省自然科学基金(No.E2019210304,No.E2021210092);河北省青年拔尖人才项目资助;河北省省级科技计划资助(No.22375412D)。

An improved Green-Ampt model considering unsaturated infiltration zone

LI Qiang1, 2, JIA Sen1, 2, LI Xin1, 2, WU Bi-ze1, 2, SHANG Yan-liang3, DONG Jun4   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Shijiazhuang Tiedao University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050043, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Roads and Railway Engineering Safety Control of Ministry of Education, Shijiazhuang Tiedao University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050043, China; 3. Department of Railway Engineering, Shijiazhuang Institute of Railway Technology, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050041, China; 4. China Railway Siyuan Survey and Design Group Co., Ltd., Wuhan, Hubei 430063, China
  • Received:2022-06-16 Revised:2022-09-22 Online:2022-12-28 Published:2023-01-05
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province (E2019210304, E2021210092), the Youth Top Talent Project of Hebei Province and the S&T Program of Hebei (22375412D).

摘要: 经典Green-Ampt入渗模型计算简单,广泛应用于土壤入渗问题的研究,但在湿润锋处理上采用明显的干湿分离界面,存在一定的理论假设。鉴于此,基于饱和区−非饱和浸润区分层模型,结合达西定律,推导出入渗过程中饱和区厚度与非饱和浸润区厚度关系的理论公式,提出了水分剖面理论模型,消除了饱和区厚度和浸润区厚度的关系假设。在此基础上,建立了考虑土壤水分剖面形状和非饱和浸润区等效参数的改进Green-Ampt模型,并采用试验和有限元数值仿真对该模型进行了验证,结果表明:该模型有很高的精度,对不同类型的土有很好的适应性。同时该模型求解简单,参数物理意义明确,便于工程应用。

关键词: Green-Ampt模型, 水分剖面模型, 非饱和浸润区, 入渗深度, 非饱和渗流

Abstract: The classical Green-Ampt infiltration model is simple in calculation and widely used in the study of soil infiltration. However, there exist some certain theoretical assumptions for the obvious dry-wet separation interface in the treatment of wetting front in the model. In view of this, based on the layered model of saturated zone-unsaturated infiltration zone and combined with Darcy’s law, a theoretical formula of the thickness relationship between the saturated zone and the unsaturated infiltration zone during infiltration was deduced in this paper and a theoretical model of water profile was proposed, which can eliminate the traditional assumption of the thickness relationship between the saturated zone and the unsaturated infiltration zone. On the basis, an improved Green-Ampt model considering the shape of soil moisture profile and the equivalent parameters in the unsaturated infiltration was established. The model was verified by experiments and finite element numerical simulation. The results show that the model has high accuracy and good adaptability to different types of soil. Meanwhile, the model is simple to solve with clear physical meaning parameters, and is convenient for engineering application.

Key words: Green-Ampt model, moisture profile model, unsaturated infiltration zone, infiltration depth, unsaturated seepage

中图分类号: TU411
[1] 韩枥兵, 李文涛, 韦昌富, . 自适应时间步长法在非饱和渗流中的应用研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 685-693.
[2] 张治国, 毛敏东, 王卫东, PAN Y T, 吴钟腾, . 降雨影响下基坑开挖施工对邻近基桩变形响应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 27-49.
[3] 张治国, 毛敏东, 朱正国, 赵其华, 吴钟腾, . 间歇性强降雨诱发滑坡对抗滑桩非线性力学响应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(7): 2073-2094.
[4] 张治国, 罗杰, 朱正国, PAN Y T, 孙苗苗, . 强降雨影响下盾构隧道开挖面稳定性的三维对数螺旋模型上限解[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(12): 3587-3601.
[5] 朱涛, 尹翔, 王成汤, 闵弘, 王浩, 陈娱, 何俊霖, . 西昌太和矿北采场滑坡变形演化规律 及成因机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S2): 392-400.
[6] 侯晓萍, 樊恒辉. 基于COMSOL Multiphysics的非饱和 裂隙土降雨入渗特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(2): 563-572.
[7] 蔡征龙, 孟永东, 秦毅, 陈博夫, 田斌, . 基于改进Green-Ampt模型的滑坡 稳定时变可靠度分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(1): 268-276.
[8] 薛松, 杨志兵, 李东奇, 陈益峰. 滴状流条件下非饱和交叉裂隙分流机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(1): 59-67.
[9] 温馨, 胡志平, 张勋, 柴少波, 吕新波, . 基于Green-Ampt模型的饱和−非饱和黄土入渗 改进模型及其参数研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1991-2000.
[10] 谢 强, 田大浪, 刘金辉, 张建华, 张志斌, . 土质边坡的饱和−非饱和渗流分析及特殊应力修正[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 879-892.
[11] 张晨阳,张 明,张泰丽,孙 强,杨 龙,. 侵入岩脉风化壳对中林村残积土滑坡渗流场和稳定性的影响[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2617-2625.
[12] 郑俊杰,郭震山,崔 岚,张 军,. 考虑非饱和渗流与增湿膨胀下的膨胀土隧道稳定性分析[J]. , 2017, 38(11): 3271-3277.
[13] 蒋泽锋 ,朱大勇,. 强降雨条件下具有张裂缝边坡临界滑动场[J]. , 2016, 37(S2): 25-34.
[14] 张 洁,吕 特,薛建锋,郑文棠,. 适用于斜坡降雨入渗分析的修正Green-Ampt模型[J]. , 2016, 37(9): 2451-2457.
[15] 豆红强,韩同春,龚晓南,李智宁,邱子义,. 降雨条件下考虑饱和渗透系数变异性的边坡可靠度分析[J]. , 2016, 37(4): 1144-1152.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!