岩土力学 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (3): 602-614.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.0764

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

管索组合结构及其力学性能研究

单仁亮,仝 潇,黄鹏程,原鸿鹄,鲍永生,刘 楠   

  1. 中国矿业大学(北京) 力学与建筑工程学院,北京 100083
  • 收稿日期:2021-05-24 修回日期:2021-12-30 出版日期:2022-03-22 发布日期:2022-03-22
  • 通讯作者: 仝潇,男,1993年生,博士研究生,主要从事岩土工程方面的研究工作。E-mail: cumtbtx@126.com
  • 作者简介:单仁亮,男,1964年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事岩土工程、岩石力学方面的教学与研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(No.51474218)

Research on the anchor cable combined with the c-shaped tube and the mechanical properties

SHAN Ren-liang, TONG Xiao, HUANG Peng-cheng, YUAN Hong-hu, BAO Yong-sheng, LIU Nan   

  1. School of Mechanics and Civil Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China
  • Received:2021-05-24 Revised:2021-12-30 Online:2022-03-22 Published:2022-03-22
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(51474218).

摘要: 为防止在巷道围岩中锚索发生剪切破断,进一步提高锚索的抗剪强度,自主研发的管索组合结构能更好地提高围岩的抗剪强度及稳定性,该结构主要由C型钢管和锚索组成。在详细介绍了管索组合结构支护结构的基础上,为了更好地研究管索组合结构的力学性能,利用自主研发的新型管索拉剪试验系统分别对不同类型、不同预应力、不同索径的管索组合结构及纯锚索进行了室内力学特性试验,分别从受力?剪切位移曲线特征、支护构件类型影响和支护结构破断模式等方面对比分析了试验结果。结果表明,管索组合结构在剪切过程中经历孔壁岩石自由变形、孔壁岩石压缩C型管、C型管握裹锚索共同变形3个阶段;管索组合结构的剪切破断形式表现为拉伸破断和拉剪复合破断,其峰值剪力与预紧力呈负相关,且与纯锚索相比,管索组合结构的剪切塑性铰的轴向距离较大,管索组合结构的最大剪力、最大轴力以及整体结构变形能力均得到提高,提升率分别达到26.8%、3.5%和7.0%以上。试验结果表明,采用管索组合结构可以有效提高结构面的整体抗剪能力。当围岩发生变形破坏时,锚索与C型钢管的组合结构不仅可以增加整个支护系统的抗剪强度,而且可以同时提高锚索的抗拔能力,从而实现锚索+C型钢管1+1>2的支护效果,在巷道周围组成有效的围岩承载圈,实现巷道围岩的稳定。

关键词: 管索组合结构, 锚索, 双剪试验, 剪切破断, 剪切强度

Abstract: In order to prevent the anchor cable from shearing and breaking in the surrounding rock of the roadway, and to further improve the shear strength of the anchor cable, we independently developed the anchor cables combined with the c-shaped tube (ACC), which can improve the shear strength and stability of the surrounding rock. The design is mainly composed of c-shaped tube and anchor cables. We first introduce the ACC support structure in detail. In order to better study the mechanical properties of ACC, the indoor mechanical properties tests of ACC and pure anchor cables have been carried out with different types, different prestresses and different cable diameters, with the help of the self-developed new type of anchor able with c-shaped tube tension-shear testing system. We compare and analyze the test results based on the characteristics of the force-shear displacement plot, the effects of the supporting member type, and the failure mode of the supporting structure. The results show that the anchor cable and its combined structure with c-shaped tube undergo three stages in the shearing process, which includes the free deformation of the bore-wall rock, the compression of the c-shaped steel tube by the bore-wall rock, and the joint deformation of the c-shaped tube wrapped with the anchor cable. The shear fracture of ACC is manifested as tensile fracture and tensile-shear composite fracture. Its peak shear force is negatively correlated with the pretension force. Compared with the pure anchor cable, the axial distance of the shear plastic hinge of ACC is larger. The maximum shear force, the maximum axial force and the overall structural deformation capacity of ACC have been improved by 26.8%, 3.5%, and 7%, respectively. The test results show that the use of ACC can effectively improve the overall shear resistance of the joint surface. When the surrounding rock is deformed and damaged, the combined structure of the anchor cable and the c-shaped steel cube can not only increase the shear strength of the entire supporting system, but also increase the tensile strength of the anchor cable at the same time. Therefore, the supporting effect of the anchor cable plus the c-shaped tube can achieve the fact where 1+1>2. The combination of two forms an effective surrounding rock bearing circle around the roadway, and the stability can be guaranteed for the surrounding rock of the roadway.

Key words: anchor cable with c-shaped tube (ACC), anchor cable, double shear test, shear failure, shear strength

中图分类号: TU451
[1] 杨烜宇, 王勇, . 考虑不同凸起体宽度的规则形态土−岩界面剪切试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 195-204.
[2] 沈扬, 沈嘉毅, 梁晖, 樊科伟. 基于3D打印技术的仿真钙质砂三轴试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2353-2362.
[3] 何梓雷, 蒋关鲁, 冯海洲, 潘申鑫, 何晓龙, 李杰, . 地震作用下桩板墙-锚索组合支护基覆型边坡的动力响应特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 2011-2023.
[4] 孙杰豪, 郭保华, 程胜锦, 田世轩, 陈岩, . 不同控制方式和卸荷应力路径下类岩石节理剪切强度特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 2061-2071.
[5] 陶志刚, 丰于翔, 赵易, 张晓宇, 何满潮, 雷啸天, . 穿断层隧道NPR锚索支护体系抗震特性振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(4): 939-949.
[6] 邓东平, 杨春会, 谢志军, . 非线性M-C强度准则下预应力锚索加固边坡时效稳定性分析M-P法[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(4): 1051-1066.
[7] 王树英, 钟嘉政, 倪准林, 郑响凑, . 带压环境下泥浆-泡沫组合改良级配不良砂剪切特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(10): 2879-2888.
[8] 冯海洲, 蒋关鲁, 何梓雷, 郭玉丰, 胡金山, 李杰, 袁胜洋, . 预应力锚索桩板墙加固隧道洞口边坡的动力响应特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 50-62.
[9] 孙晓明, 齐振敏, 缪澄宇, 臧金诚, 高祥, 赵成伟, 张勇, . 万福矿深埋大断面T型交叉点高预应力NPR支护机制及应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(4): 1130-1141.
[10] 姜海波, 付龙龙, 周顺华, 郭培军, 叶伟涛, . 高频振动下散粒体−结构界面临界状态强度特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(3): 810-820.
[11] 林海, 曾一帆, 周创兵, 董平霄, 施建勇, . 褶皱土工膜+针刺钠基膨润土防水毯复合衬里的剪切试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(2): 355-361.
[12] 王元战, 龚晓龙, 王轩, 陈艳萍, 谢涛, . 偏压固结下碱渣土循环累积孔压及强度弱化规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(2): 373-380.
[13] 张志飞, 黄曼, 唐志成, . 估算异性岩石不连续面峰值剪切强度的经验公式[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(2): 507-519.
[14] 牛庚, 朱晓凤, 李俊星, 吕梦缘, 安荔琪, 陈子晗, . 宽广吸力范围非饱和土剪切强度试验研究及其预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(12): 3349-3359.
[15] 张雷, 吕延栋, 王炳辉, 金丹丹, 竺明星, 方晨, . 絮凝−真空−电渗联合加固滩涂软土的模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(9): 2383-2390.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!