岩土力学 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (4): 857-867.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.1087

• 基础理论与实验研究 •    下一篇

非饱和透明土优先流迁移规律分析

阙云1,翁斌1,蔡松林1,LIU Jin-yuan2   

  1. 1. 福州大学 土木工程学院,福建 福州 350116;2. 瑞尔森大学 土木工程系,加拿大 多伦多
  • 收稿日期:2021-07-17 修回日期:2021-09-17 出版日期:2022-04-15 发布日期:2022-04-15
  • 作者简介:阙云,男,1980年生,博士,教授,主要从事边坡稳定与治理方面的教学与研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 41772297)

Analysis of preferential flow migration in unsaturated transparent soil

QUE Yun1, WENG Bin1, CAI Song-lin1, LIU Jin-yuan2   

  1. 1. College of Civil Engineering, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou, Fujian 350116, China; 2. Department of Civil Engineering, Ryerson University, Toronto, Canada
  • Received:2021-07-17 Revised:2021-09-17 Online:2022-04-15 Published:2022-04-15
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41772297).

摘要: 为实现土的非饱和优先流迁移可视化,设计立柱装置进行非饱和渗流试验,采用透明土与数字图像处理技术,建立归一化像素强度与透明土饱和度的关系,在此基础上,通过室内模型试验,研究优先流路径连通性与相邻优先流路径旋转角对非饱和土优先流迁移的影响。试验结果表明:基于图像灰度像素强度表征非饱和透明土饱和度方法是可行的;全连通优先流(O-O型)与上连通优先流(O-C型)剖面呈现T型,中心轴剖面饱和度与边缘差异明显,下连通优先流路径(C-O型)中土体油压与基质势不足以使流体进入优先流路径形成优先流,入渗趋势与均匀流一致,O-C型优先流的稳定入渗率和湿润锋推移速度分别为C-O型的1.5倍和1.4倍;相邻O-C型优先流之间区域形成新的优先流,土体达到较高饱和度,增长速率随旋转角的增加而减小,优先流转角为90?、60?、30?时稳定入渗速率分别为均匀流的1.5、1.3、1.2倍;流体受重力影响,转角小的优先流仅沿路径一侧水平渗透,但湿润锋推移速度分别为均匀流的1.3、1.4、1.5倍,相邻优先流相互作用减弱,难以形成新的优先流。

关键词: 透明土, 归一化像素强度, 饱和度, 非饱和优先流, 湿润锋

Abstract: In order to realize the visualization of unsaturated preferential flow migration of soil, a column device was designed to carry out unsaturated seepage tests. The transparent soil and digital image processing technology were used to establish the relationship between the normalized pixel intensity and the saturation of transparent soil. On this basis, the effects of the connectivity of the preferential flow path and the rotation angle of the adjacent preferential flow path on the preferential flow migration in unsaturated soils were studied by conducting laboratory model tests. The results showed that it was feasible to characterize the saturation of unsaturated transparent soils based on the intensity of image gray pixels. The profile of fully connected preferential flow (O-O type) and upper connected preferential flow (O-C type) presented T-shape. The saturation of the central axis profile was obviously different from that of the central edge profile. In the lower connected preferential flow path (C-O type), the soil oil pressure and matrix potential could not make the fluid enter the preferential flow path to form the preferential flow, in which the change of infiltration was consistent with the uniform flow. The stable infiltration rate and the wetting front moving velocity of O-C preferential flow were 1.5 times and 1.4 times of those of the C-O type, respectively. A new preferential flow was formed in the area between adjacent O-C preferential flows. The soil in that area reached higher saturation and the growth rate of saturation decreased with the increase of rotation angle. When the preferential flow rotation angle was 90?, 60? and 30?, the stable infiltration rate was respectively 1.5 times, 1.3 times and 1.2 times that of the uniform flow. As the fluid was affected by gravity, the preferential flow with a small rotation angle only infiltrated horizontally along one side of the path. However, the moving velocity of the wetting front was 1.3 times, 1.4 times, and 1.5 times that of uniform flow, respectively. The interaction between adjacent preferential flows was weakened, so it was difficult to form the new preferential flow.

Key words: transparent soil, normalized pixel intensity, saturation, unsaturated preferential flow, wetting front

中图分类号: U 416
[1] 张淼, 李林, 郑瀚波, 李盼盼, . 考虑饱和度影响的结构性黄土弹塑性本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2816-2824.
[2] 邹诗环, 黄茂松, 时振昊, . 高饱和度含气土动力问题的有限体积法分步解法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1286-1293.
[3] 杨柳, 吉明秀, 赵艳, 耿振坤, 李思源, 马雄德, 张谦, . 致密砂岩孔隙结构对两相驱替特征及CO2封存效率的影响机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1187-1195.
[4] 林滨强, 章德生, 简文彬, 豆红强, 王浩, 樊秀峰, . 风驱雨作用下植被斜坡稳定性响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2765-2774.
[5] 黄楠, 朱斌, 王路君, . 考虑水合物孔隙赋存模式演化的含水合物沉积物渗透率模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2387-2396.
[6] 罗晓倩, 孔令伟, 鄢俊彪, 高志傲, 田升奎, . 不同饱和度下膨胀土原位孔内剪切试验及强度响应特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(1): 153-163.
[7] 田升奎, 刘观仕, 赵青松, 徐国方, 蔡铭炫, . 基于图像RGB信息测试湿度场技术的风积沙毛细水上升试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(9): 2525-2536.
[8] 祁妍敏, 汪淼, 章定文, 林文丽, . 甲基叔丁基醚污染黏土的Archie电阻率模型修正方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(6): 1719-1728.
[9] 赵煜鑫, 李 旭, 赵红芬, 刘 艳. 宽饱和度范围非饱和土抗剪强度指标的演化模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(10): 2809-2820.
[10] 郭凯丰, 张仪萍. 双层地基中气体聚集与土体变形机制的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(1): 99-108.
[11] 王滢, 王海萍, 高盟, . 非饱和土中圆柱形衬砌隧道的瞬态动力响应[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(11): 3185-3197.
[12] 刘阿强, 李旭, 刘艳, 张志远. 全吸力范围内渗透系数快速测定方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(11): 3209-3219.
[13] 邓泽之, 吉恩跃, 王刚, . 波动水力条件下土体内侵蚀特性的 透明土试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(10): 2726-2734.
[14] 郭智辉, 简文彬, 刘青灵, 聂闻. 基于现场原型试验的斜坡降雨入渗分析及 入渗模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(6): 1635-1647.
[15] 刘德仁, 徐硕昌, 肖洋, 王旭, 李建东, 张严, . 浸水入渗条件下压实黄土水−气运移规律试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(12): 3260-3270.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!