岩土力学 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (8): 2317-2326.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.1815

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

水力切缝上方TBM滚刀贯入破坏机制模拟研究

程建龙1, 2, 3,邹清友1,杨圣奇2,李晓昭2,梁泉1,曲磊1,梅炎1   

  1. 1. 成都理工大学 地质灾害防治与地质环境保护国家重点实验室,四川 成都 610059; 2. 中国矿业大学 深部岩土力学与地下工程国家重点实验室,江苏 徐州 221116;3. 山东大学 岩土与结构工程研究中心,山东 济南 250061
  • 收稿日期:2021-10-28 修回日期:2022-03-13 出版日期:2022-08-11 发布日期:2022-08-19
  • 作者简介:程建龙,男,1989年生,博士后,副教授,硕士生导师,主要从事TBM与围岩相互作用控制机理与地下工程方面的教学与科研工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金青年基金(No. 42007277);中国博士后科学基金第70批面上项目(No. 2021M702000);深部岩土力学与地下工程国家重点实验室开放基金(No. SKLGDUEK2007)

Simulation of indentation behavior of TBM disc cutter and failure mechanism of hard rock assisted by hydraulic precutting kerfs

CHENG Jian-long1, 2, 3, ZOU Qing-you1, YANG Sheng-qi2, LI Xiao-zhao2, LIANG Quan1, QU Lei1, MEI Yan1   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention and Geoenvironment Protection, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu, Sichuan 610059, China; 2. State Key Laboratory for Geomechanics and Deep Underground Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, Jiangsu 221116, China; 3. Geotechnical and Structural Engineering Research Center, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250061, China
  • Received:2021-10-28 Revised:2022-03-13 Online:2022-08-11 Published:2022-08-19
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Youth Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (42007277), the 70th General Program of China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2021M702000) and the Opening Fund of State Key Laboratory for Geomechanics and Deep Underground Engineering (SKLGDUEK2007).

摘要: 为了提高坚硬岩层隧道掘进机(tunnel boring machine, TBM)贯入度和降低滚刀受力,高压水射流辅助TBM滚刀破岩已在工业界初步应用。为了揭示水力切缝滚刀破岩机制,基于水力切缝岩石滚刀贯入试验进行了三维颗粒流模拟,研究了滚刀贯入力和贯入刚度随切缝深度的变化规律,揭示了不同切缝深度滚刀纵横剖面内的裂纹扩展和力链演化过程,分析了拉裂纹和剪裂纹随切缝深度的变化规律,明确了不同切缝岩石滚刀贯入的破坏模式和破坏机制。结果表明,第1次贯入的贯入刚度和贯入力随切缝深度的增加大致呈线性降低,第2次贯入的峰值力和贯入刚度小于第1次。而且,50~80 mm刀间距的变化对峰值贯入力的影响并不显著。随着切缝深度的增加,滚刀下方力链集中区边缘的倾角变大。由此导致破坏倾向于倾斜向下发展,当刀间距增加时,破坏由切缝一侧倾斜破坏向两切缝中间岩脊倾斜破坏转变,研究结果可为TBM滚刀与水射流布置和切缝深度的选取提供一定参考。

关键词: 高压磨料水射流切缝, TBM滚刀, 贯入试验, 破坏机制, 三维颗粒流模拟

Abstract: To improve the penetration rate of tunnel boring machine (TBM) in hard rock and reduce the cutter force, high pressure water jet assisted TBM rock breaking has been initially applied in industry. To investigate the rock breakage mechanism of disc cutter assisted by precutting kerfs, a 3D particle flow simulation was performed based on the indentation test of hard rock with hydraulic cutting kerfs. The variation of indentation force and indentation stiffness with kerf depth was studied. The evolution of crack propagation and contact force chain parallel and perpendicular to the cutter axis are revealed. The variation of tensile and shear cracks with kerf depth and kerf spacing and the corresponding failure mode and failure mechanism are discussed. The results show that the indentation stiffness and indentation force of the first indentation decrease linearly with the increase of kerf depth, and that of the second indentation are less than that of the first indentation. Moreover, the change of kerf spacing between 50 and 80 mm has no significant effect on the peak force. With the increase of kerf depth, the inclined boundary angle of the concentrated force chain under the cutter becomes larger. As a result, the failure tends to be inclined downward. When the kerf spacing increases, the failure mode changes from the inclined failure towards another kerf to inclined failure towards the middle rock ridge. The research results can provide some reference for the layout between TBM disc cutters and water jet nozzles and the selection of kerf depth.

Key words: high pressure abrasive water jet, TBM disc cutter, indentation test, failure mechanism, 3D particle flow code simulation

中图分类号: TD 263.3;TD 313
[1] 杨烜宇, 王勇, . 考虑不同凸起体宽度的规则形态土−岩界面剪切试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 195-204.
[2] 范猛, 李敬军, 杨正权, 刘小生, 朱凯斌, 赵剑明, . 基于标准贯入试验的液化判别方法对深埋砂土适用性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2085-2094.
[3] 田雷, 谢强, 段军, 陶富涛, 班宇鑫, 傅翔, 晏彬淇, . 三向斜锚短桩基础拉拔荷载作用下桩锚节点的受力特性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 278-288.
[4] 周建, 尚肖楠, 刘福深, 沈君逸, 廖星川, . 倾斜临空面下隧道掘进机滚刀贯入破岩研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 705-714.
[5] 李永威, 徐林荣, 傅金阳, 商拥辉, . 列车荷载作用下铁路路基填料渗透破坏机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 299-308.
[6] 魏明星, 朱永建, 任恒, 李鹏, 王希之, 王平, 唐成, . 三轴卸荷损伤砂岩单轴再承载力学特性及其破坏机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(10): 3047-3057.
[7] 杨凯丞, 吴曙光, 廖海成, 张辉, . 双锚杆受力机制分析及模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 495-503.
[8] 周建, 尚肖楠, 刘福深, 沈君逸, 廖星川, . 利用近场动力学方法模拟隧道掘进机滚刀三维贯入破岩[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(9): 2732-2743.
[9] 张院生, 雷云超, 强小俊, 吴东东, 王东坡, 王计华, . 多排微型桩框架结构加固边坡离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(7): 1983-1994.
[10] 信春雷, 杨飞, 冯文凯, 李文惠, 廖军, . 多期地震作用的台阶式顺层岩质边坡震裂破坏机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(12): 3481-3494.
[11] 贾端阳, 陈龙伟, 谢旺青, 李鑫洋, . 基于标准贯入试验的土壤液化判别公式锤击数 基准值研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(10): 3031-3038.
[12] 王维铭, 陈龙伟, 郭婷婷, 汪云龙, 凌贤长, . 基于中国砂土液化数据库的标准贯入试验液化 判别方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(1): 279-288.
[13] 王刚, 宋磊博, 刘夕奇, 包春燕, 吝曼卿, 刘广建, . 非贯通节理花岗岩剪切断裂力学特性及 声发射特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(6): 1533-1545.
[14] 周辉, 徐福通, 卢景景, 高阳, 肖建成, . 切槽对TBM刀具破岩机制的影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(3): 625-634.
[15] 朱学亮, 邵生俊, 沈晓钧, 邵帅, 刘小康, . 裂隙黄土边坡三维稳定性极限分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(10): 2735-2743.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!