岩土力学 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (S1): 258-266.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2020.0946

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

板裂结构顺层岩质边坡滑移−弯曲破坏 机制的力学模型研究

杨肖锋1, 2,鲁祖德1,陈从新1,孙朝燚1,刘轩廷1, 2   

  1. 1. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071;2. 中国科学院大学,北京 100049
  • 收稿日期:2020-07-06 修回日期:2021-03-16 出版日期:2022-06-30 发布日期:2022-07-14
  • 通讯作者: 鲁祖德,男,1981年生,博士,副研究员,主要从事岩石力学试验与边坡稳定性方面的研究工作。E-mail: zdlu@whrsm.ac.cn E-mail:1757660126@qq.com
  • 作者简介:杨肖锋,男,1995年生,硕士研究生,主要从事边坡稳定性方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划(No.2017YFC0805307);国家自然科学基金资助项目(No.41202225);中科院青年创新促进会资助项目(No.2015271)。

Analysis of mechanical model of sliding-bending failure in bedding rock slopes with slab-rent structure

YANG Xiao-feng1, 2, LU Zu-de1, CHEN Cong-xin1, SUN Chao-yi1, LIU Xuan-ting1, 2   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • Received:2020-07-06 Revised:2021-03-16 Online:2022-06-30 Published:2022-07-14
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program Project of China(2017YFC0805307), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41202225) and the Youth Innovation Promotion Association, CAS(2015271).

摘要: 滑移−弯曲破坏是顺层岩质边坡的常见破坏模式之一。基于板裂结构顺层岩质边坡的地质成因分析,将最大拉应力强度理论引入到地质力学模型分析中;根据破坏特征,将板裂结构顺层岩质边坡的岩层带分为滑移段和弯曲段;采用能量法、Rayleigh-Ritz方法及势能驻值原理等近似模拟弯曲段的挠曲方程;运用梁板强度理论,推导了板裂结构顺层岩质边坡最大拉应力计算公式和边坡潜在破坏点预测模型;在此基础上,将理论公式程序化,通过典型滑坡算例,得到了理论预测值与实际破坏值的近似一致性;通过FLAC3D数值模拟软件分析了山阳滑坡的破坏过程,并得出:(1)滑坡体总位移的变化趋势呈现出明显的滑移−弯曲变化特征;(2)最大拉应力和张拉塑性区所在位置的数值模拟结果与理论计算结果近似一致。

关键词: 板裂结构, 顺层岩质边坡, 滑移?弯曲破坏, 力学模型

Abstract: Sliding-bending failure is one of the common modes in bedding rock slopes. In this paper, we analyzed the geological origin of bedding rock slopes with slab-rent structure, and applied the theory of maximum tensile stress to the analysis of geomechanical models. According to the damage characteristics, the sliding-bending rock stratum was divided into two parts: the sliding section and the bending section. Then, the energy method, the Rayleigh-Ritz method, and the stationary value theory of total potential energy were used to simulate the equation of deflection curve approximatively. Besides, the formulae for calculating the maximum tensile stress and for the prediction model of potential failure location in bedding rock slopes with slab-rent structure were deduced based on the beam-plate theory. On this basis, the theoretical formula was programed and the approximate consistency between the theoretical prediction value and the accrual failure value was obtained through calculating the typical failure slope. Finally, the failure process of Shanyang landslide was analyzed by FLAC3D numerical simulation software and the following conclusions were drawn: (1) The variation trend of the total displacement was characterized by obvious sliding-bending variation. (2) The numerical simulation results of the maximum tensile stress and the location of the tensile plastic zone were approximately consistent with the theoretical results.

Key words: slab-rent structure, bedding rock slope, sliding-bending failure, mechanical model

中图分类号: TU452
[1] 李晓照, 闫怀蔚, 李连杰, 戚承志. 预拉脆性岩石动态直接拉伸断裂的宏细观力学模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 217-227.
[2] 胡伟, 曾攀煜, 王辉, 刘顺凯, 陈秋南, PUIG DAMIANS I, . 黏性土地基中水平条形锚板上拔承载力计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1731-1744.
[3] 周光远, 干飞, 郑刚, 周海祚, 王宏, 毕靖, 刘彪, 张元胤, . 基于土体变形的端承桩负摩阻力计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 930-942.
[4] 李晓照, 车行, 李海峰, 戚承志. 干湿循环脆性岩石直接拉伸断裂的宏细观力学模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 1906-1916.
[5] 胡伟, 王辉, 姚琛, 郝冬雪, 史旦达, . 砂土中水平矩形锚板竖向拉拔承载全域内三维统一力学模型与承载力计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(6): 1811-1825.
[6] 许明, 余小越, 赵元平, 胡家驹, 张潇婷, . 顺倾层状碎裂结构岩质边坡地震动力响应及破坏模式分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(2): 362-372.
[7] 信春雷, 杨飞, 冯文凯, 李文惠, 廖军, . 多期地震作用的台阶式顺层岩质边坡震裂破坏机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(12): 3481-3494.
[8] 汪北方, 蒋嘉祺, 刘学生, 梁冰, 张晶. 浅埋厚松散层薄基岩综采工作面开采覆岩切落体结构分析及应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(10): 3011-3021.
[9] 夏鑫, 姜元俊, 苏立君, MEHTAB Alam, 李佳佳, . 基于界面黏结的含根土抗剪强度极限值估算模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(8): 2173-2184.
[10] 吴振华, 潘鹏志, 潘俊锋, 王兆丰, 高家明. 地堑构造区冲击地压发生机制及矿震活动规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(8): 2225-2238.
[11] 朱淳, 何满潮, 张晓虎, 陶志刚, 尹乾, 李利峰, . 恒阻大变形锚杆非线性力学模型 及恒阻行为影响参数分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(7): 1911-1924.
[12] 黄智刚, 左清军, 吴立, 陈福榜, 胡圣松, 朱盛, . 水岩作用下泥质板岩软化非线性机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(9): 2931-2942.
[13] 芦苇, 赵冬, 李东波, 毛筱霏. 土遗址全长黏结式锚固系统动力响应解析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1377-1387.
[14] 丑亚玲, 黄守洋, 孙丽源, 王莉杰, 岳国栋, 曹伟, 盛煜, . 基于冻融作用的氯盐渍土−钢块界面力学模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 41-52.
[15] 周翠英, 黄思宇, 刘镇, 陆仪启, . 红层软岩软化的界面过程及其动力学模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3189-3196.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!