岩土力学 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (S1): 580-590.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2020.1194

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

离散单元法软件EDEM中接触半径对岩石 力学特性的影响及其应用

申浩翰,张海,范俊锴,徐瑞阳,张小明   

  1. 河南理工大学 机械与动力工程学院,河南 焦作 454002
  • 收稿日期:2020-08-12 修回日期:2021-03-05 出版日期:2022-06-30 发布日期:2022-07-15
  • 作者简介:申浩翰,男,1996年生,硕士研究生,主要从事岩石冲击破碎方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(No.51975189)。

Influence of contact radius on rock mechanical property and its application in discrete element method software EDEM

SHEN Hao-han, ZHANG Hai, FAN Jun-kai, XU Rui-yang, ZHANG Xiao-ming   

  1. School of Mechanical and Power Engineering, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo, Henan 454002, China
  • Received:2020-08-12 Revised:2021-03-05 Online:2022-06-30 Published:2022-07-15
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(51975189).

摘要: 以EDEM软件的Hertz-Mindlin接触模型为对象,对接触半径与黏结键强度的关系及其对岩石抗拉和抗压强度的影响进行研究,提出了一种建立高压拉强度比岩石离散元模型的方法。根据接触模型的强度准则和几何准则,提出了黏结键受拉状态下的“强键”、“弱键”以及临界接触半径系数的概念,推导出了接触颗粒间法向运动和切向运动时的临界接触半径表达式。以接触半径系数a 为自变量进行了岩石单轴压缩和单轴拉伸仿真试验,结果表明:抗拉强度随a 变化呈三阶段分段线性关系,1.000 0≤a<1.000 8区间内,曲线斜率很大;1.000 8≤ a ≤1.002 5区间内,曲线斜率较小;a>1.002 5后,抗拉强度几乎不变化。抗压强度随a 变化呈两阶段分段线性关系,在1.000 0≤a ≤1.000 2区间内,曲线斜率很大;当a>1.000 2后,抗压强度几乎不变化。在1.000 1≤a ≤1.000 3区间内,抗压强度和抗拉强度之比约为6.5~14.0,可以较好地拟合真实岩石的抗拉和抗压特性,从而构建出具有高压拉强度比的岩石离散元模型。

关键词: EDEM软件, 离散元法, 岩石, 接触半径

Abstract: Based on the Hertz-Mindlin contact model in EDEM, the relationship between contact radius and bond strength, and the influence of contact radius on tensile and compressive strengths of rock model were investigated. A method for establishing discrete element model of rock with high compressive-tensile strength ratio was suggested. According to the strength and geometric criteria of the contact model in EDEM, the concepts of “strong bond”, “weak bond” and critical contact radius coefficient were proposed. The formulae of critical contact radius when two particles in contact move along normal or tangential directions were derived. The rock uniaxial compression and tension simulation experiments were carried out with the contact radius coefficient α as an independent variable, and the results show that: the tensile strength shows a three-stage piecewise linear relationship with the change of α. At the interval of 1.000 0≤<1.000 8, the slope of the curve is very large. At the interval of 1.000 8≤≤1.002 5, the slope of the curve is small. When >1.002 5, the tensile strength is almost constant. The compressive strength shows a two-stage piecewise linear relationship with the change of α. At the interval of 1.000 0≤ ≤1.000 2, the slope of the curve is very large, and after >1.000 2, the compressive strength is also almost constant. In the interval of 1.000 1≤≤1.000 3, the compressive-tensile strength ratio is about 6.5 to 14.0, and it can be used to reproduce the tensile and compressive properties of real rock, so as to construct the discrete element model of rock with high compressive-tensile strength ratio.

Key words: EDEM software, discrete element method, rock, contact radius

中图分类号: TU452
[1] 付强, 杨科, 刘钦节, 宋涛涛, 吴犇牛, 于鹏, . 交变荷载下围岩−衬砌组合结构界面强度特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 40-52.
[2] 金解放, 熊慧颖, 肖莜丰, 彭孝旺. 岩石超声波对三维地应力的敏感性及传播衰减特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 183-194.
[3] 李晓照, 闫怀蔚, 李连杰, 戚承志. 预拉脆性岩石动态直接拉伸断裂的宏细观力学模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 217-227.
[4] 刘一鸣, 李振, 冯国瑞, 杨鹏, 白锦文, 黄炳雄, 李东, . 循环加卸载下裂隙砂岩声−热响应特征及前兆规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2773-2791.
[5] 黄德昕, 温韬, 陈宁生, . 考虑能量演化的岩石残余强度确定方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2825-2836.
[6] 董源, 胡英国, 刘美山, 李庚泉, 马晨阳. 均质岩石高边坡开挖爆破累积损伤的演化机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2929-2942.
[7] 孙闯, 蒲云波, 敖云鹤, 陶琦, . 冻融饱水裂隙砂岩力学特性及细观破裂演化特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2339-2352.
[8] 李晓锋, 李海波, 刘黎旺, 傅帅旸, . 冲击荷载作用下岩石动态拉伸破坏特征及细观机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2387-2398.
[9] 劳国峰, 阳军生, 谢亦朋, 汤冲, 许志鹏, . 基于骨架结构指标的连续级配颗粒土峰值抗剪强度模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2459-2470.
[10] 张亮亮, 程桦, 姚直书, 王晓健, . 常规三轴压缩条件下岩石蠕变破坏时间预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2011-2022.
[11] 吕萌, 王亮清, 谢妮, 朱林锋, 安彩龙, 柯睿, 王旭晨, . 加锚异性结构面剪切特性及声发射响应特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2106-2120.
[12] 倪祖甲, 乔江美, 张俊楷, 唐旭海, . 基于微观岩石力学试验及精确矿物晶体建模的砂岩力学性质及波速分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1865-1880.
[13] 张艳博, 周浩, 梁鹏, 姚旭龙, 陶志刚, 来有邦, . 基于到时精确拾取与智能优化算法结合的岩石声发射定位方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1643-1656.
[14] 申林方, 华涛, 王志良, 李松波, 陈骞. 参数空间变异性对岩石水力压裂裂隙扩展形态的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1294-1302.
[15] 朱元广, 王璇尧, 刘滨, 刘学伟, 薛皓元, 耿志, . 层状岩石横观各向同性蠕变损伤本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1095-1108.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!