岩土力学 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (S1): 641-649.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2020.0770

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于土体强度冗余法的桩锚支护结构 动态稳定性分析

周勇1, 2, 3,赵元基1, 2, 3,王正振1, 2, 3   

  1. 1. 兰州理工大学 甘肃省土木工程防灾减灾重点实验室,甘肃 兰州 730050;2. 兰州理工大学 西部土木工程防灾减灾教育部工程研究中心, 甘肃 兰州 730050;3. 兰州理工大学 土木工程学院,甘肃 兰州 730050
  • 收稿日期:2020-06-08 修回日期:2021-04-07 出版日期:2022-06-30 发布日期:2022-07-15
  • 作者简介:周勇,男,1978年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事深基坑开挖支护和边坡加固方面的教学与研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.51568042);教育部长江学者和创新团队发展计划(No.IRT_17R51)。

Analysis of dynamic stability of pile-anchor retaining structure based on soil strength redundancy method

ZHOU Yong1, 2, 3, ZHAO Yuan-ji1, 2, 3, WANG Zheng-zhen1, 2, 3   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Disaster Mitigation in Civil Engineering of Gansu Province, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou, Gansu 730050, China; 2. Western Center of Disaster Mitigation in Civil Engineering, Ministry of Education, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou, Gansu 730050, China; 3. School of Civil Engineering, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou, Gansu 730050, China
  • Received:2020-06-08 Revised:2021-04-07 Online:2022-06-30 Published:2022-07-15
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Science Foundation of China(51568042) and the Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University(IRT_17R51).

摘要: 滑裂面的搜索方法及安全系数的计算理论是深基坑桩锚支护结构稳定性分析理论的基础。传统圆弧滑动法在分析抗滑力矩的过程中,滑裂面法向应力的计算存在过多假设;且在通过网格搜索法确定最危险滑裂面圆心的过程中,粗糙网格的搜索结果误差较大,精细网格的搜索效率较低。基于以上问题,提出了分析基坑动态稳定性的土体强度冗余法,并采用了可提高精细网格搜索效率的自适应网格搜索法。通过算例将土体强度冗余法、滑动面应力法及圆弧滑动法的计算结果进行对比。计算结果表明,滑动面应力法高估了对滑裂面附近土体的抗剪强度,圆弧滑动法不能考虑土方开挖对桩后土体抗剪强度的削弱作用,土体强度冗余法能合理反映基坑的整体稳定性。

关键词: 基坑工程, 桩锚支护结构, 稳定性, 强度冗余法, 自适应网格搜索

Abstract: The stability analysis of pile-anchor retaining structure is based on the searching method of the sliding surface and the calculating theory of the safety factor. During the process of analyzing anti-sliding moment, conventional slip circle method of slices has too many assumptions. At the same time, during the process of searching for the most dangerous sliding surface, there are some problems with the grid-search method. If the rough grid is applied, the result will be less accurate. However, if the fine grid is applied, the efficiency will be lower. To solve these problems, the soil strength redundancy method is proposed in order to analyze dynamic stability of foundation pit. Also, adaptive grid-search method is used to ensure accuracy and efficiency. Finally, this paper compareds the soil strength redundancy method, the sliding surface stress method and the slip circle method of slices. The results show that the sliding surface stress method overestimates the overall stability of the foundation pit and that the slip circle method of slices cannot consider the weakening effect on the shear strength of the soil behind the pile caused by excavation. Also, the soil strength redundancy method can reflect the overall stability of the foundation pit.

Key words: excavation engineering, pile-anchor retaining structure, stability, strength redundancy method, adaptive grid-search method

中图分类号: TU473
[1] 冯德銮, 余洋, 梁仕华. 碱激发地聚物固化滨海软土的强度和水稳定性研究进展与评述[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 13-39.
[2] 邓其宁, 崔玉龙, 王炯超, 郑俊, 许冲, . 三维边坡稳定性计算的ChatGPT辅助编程方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 322-334.
[3] 徐全, 侯靖, 杨剑, 杨昕光, 倪绍虎, 陈鑫. 基于合成岩体技术的岩质边坡稳定性精细化分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2062-2070.
[4] 李邵军, 张世殊, 李永红, 柳秀洋, 李治国, 徐鼎平, 程丽娟, 江权, 汤大明, 陈刚, . 双江口水电站极高应力大型地下厂房硬岩破坏机制与稳定性控制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1581-1594.
[5] 刘祥宁, 张文杰, . 酸性干湿循环下铬污染土固化体浸出行为研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1196-1204.
[6] 曹虎, 张广清, 李世远, 汪文瑞, 谢彭旭, 孙伟, 李帅, . 基于断裂过程区的压裂驱油水力裂缝 扩展模型及应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 798-810.
[7] 孙文超, 王君豪, 徐文杰, 董晓阳, 任禾, 王洪兵, 张学杰, 王恒威, . 基于物质点法的高速公路弃渣场稳定性及 灾害动力学分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 991-1000.
[8] 邓东平, 徐润冬, 彭一航, 文莎莎. 强度空间非均质性与各向异性特征下边坡稳定性极限平衡滑面应力法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 55-72.
[9] 钱法桥, 邓亚虹, 慕焕东, 杨楠, 刘凡, 王梦晨, . 基于小波变换和拟动力法的边坡地震稳定性评价方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 88-96.
[10] 张振波, 李秉欣, 杨茜, 刘志春, 刘义, . 近接基坑工程有限土体失稳模式研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 266-277.
[11] 魏星, 陈睿, 程世涛, 朱明, 王子健, . 成都膨胀土地区深基坑降雨稳定性分析与变形预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 525-534.
[12] 易顺, 陈健, 潘家军, 王艳丽, 徐晗, 刘春鹏, . 内撑式基坑围护结构水平变形的表征函数研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 568-578.
[13] 郭晓刚, 马垒, 张超, 淦树成, 王华, 甘一雄, 周通, . 软弱基底排土场边坡逆排堆高速率及稳定性控制方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 596-606.
[14] 林滨强, 章德生, 简文彬, 豆红强, 王浩, 樊秀峰, . 风驱雨作用下植被斜坡稳定性响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2765-2774.
[15] 冯世进, 徐熠, 杨俊毅, 郑奇腾, 张晓磊, . 基于集对-组合赋权的填埋场失稳风险评价方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 2129-2139.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!