岩土力学 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (S2): 95-103.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.2135

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

浅埋管道水平横向作用下砂土极限承载力研究

钟紫蓝,韩春堂,李锦强,赵鑫,缪惠全   

  1. 北京工业大学 城市与工程安全减灾教育部重点实验室,北京 100124
  • 收稿日期:2021-12-20 修回日期:2022-03-15 出版日期:2022-10-10 发布日期:2022-10-03
  • 通讯作者: 缪惠全,男,1988年生,博士后,助理研究员,主要从事生命线工程与韧性城市方面的研究。E-mail: miaohq@126.com E-mail:zilanzhong@bjut.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:钟紫蓝,男,1986年生,博士,副研究员,主要从事地下结构抗震方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(No.51978020);国家自然科学基金联合基金(No.U1839201)。

Ultimate bearing capacity of sand under lateral horizontal movement of shallowly buried pipelines

ZHONG Zi-lan, HAN Chun-tang, LI Jin-qiang, ZHAO Xin, MIAO Hui-quan   

  1. Key Laboratory of Urban Security and Disaster Engineering of Ministry of Education, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China
  • Received:2021-12-20 Revised:2022-03-15 Online:2022-10-10 Published:2022-10-03
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the General Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (51978020) and the Joint Funds of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (U1839201).

摘要: 断层、滑坡、液化等地质灾害引起的场地大变形对埋地管道结构安全产生严重的威胁。开展了中密砂中埋地管道−砂土水平横向相互作用的系列三维数值模拟,根据数值模拟的结果探讨了不同深径比下管−砂土横向相互作用时土体的破坏模式,研究了深径比对砂土极限承载力的影响。基于管周土体的破坏模式建立了简化计算模型,根据极限平衡理论推导了管道水平横向运动时砂土极限承载力计算公式。研究结果表明:极限状态下,浅埋管道周围土体形成延伸到地表的破裂面,轮廓线近似对数螺线;砂土的极限承载力随着深径比增加,最终在临界深径比处达到稳定;随着深径比的增加,土体发生剪切滑动破坏所需的管道位移也逐渐增大;由于横向承载力系数取值依据不同,国内外规范计算所得土体极限承载力差异较大;得到的解析解能够较好地预测中密砂土中浅埋管道水平横向运动时土体的极限承载力。

关键词: 埋地管道, 管?土相互作用, 中密砂, 极限承载力, 破坏模式

Abstract: Large ground deformation such as faults, landslides and liquefaction may pose a serious threat to the structural safety of buried pipelines. This paper presents a series of three-dimensional numerical simulation of horizontal lateral pipe–soil interaction in medium dense sand, discusses the failure mechanisms of sand under different depth-diameter ratios, and examines the influence of depth-diameter ratio on the ultimate bearing capacity of sand. Moreover, a simplified analytical model is proposed based on the failure mechanism of soil around the pipe. According to the limit-state equilibrium theory, the analytical solution of the ultimate bearing capacity under horizontal lateral motion of the pipe is derived. The results show that, in the limit state, the soil around the shallowly buried pipeline forms a rupture surface extending to the ground surface with a failure shape approximately to a logarithmic spiral. The ultimate bearing capacity of sand increases with the burial depth-diameter ratio of the pipe, and finally reaches a constant value at the critical depth-diameter ratio. With the increase of depth-diameter ratio, the pipe displacement required for shear failure of soil also gradually increases. The difference in ultimate bearing capacity calculated by Chinese codes and foreign codes is due to the different empirical lateral bearing capacity coefficient. The analytical solution proposed in this paper can favorably predict the ultimate bearing capacity of soil under lateral horizontal movement of shallowly buried pipes in medium dense sand.

Key words: buried pipe, pipe-soil interaction, medium dense sand, ultimate bearing capacity, failure mechanism

中图分类号: TU452
[1] 储超群, 包兴佳, 毛明发, 吴顺川, 崔贺佳, . 深地灰岩三轴压缩声发射特征及破坏形式试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2049-2061.
[2] 刘健, 夏勇, 江权, 陈涛, 贺维国, 范国刚, 熊先涛, 郑虹, . 强烈构造区硬梁包水电站地下洞室群围岩变形破坏特征与泸定地震响应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2265-2280.
[3] 汪昕, 幸安康, 曾子强, 姜祎, 徐建宇, 王晓南, 刘造保, . 层理铁矿石剪切力学性能试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1039-1048.
[4] 杨柳, 杨铎, 何满潮, . 基于纳米划痕的陆相页岩纹层界面过渡区分布范围定量研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 353-367.
[5] 邓东平, 徐润冬, 彭一航, 文莎莎. 强度空间非均质性与各向异性特征下边坡稳定性极限平衡滑面应力法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 55-72.
[6] 范浩, 王磊, 罗勇, 朱传奇, . 卸荷损伤砂岩的分级加载三轴蠕变力学特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 277-288.
[7] 高荡, 彭俊, 王航龙, 王林飞, 彭坤, . 含层理砂岩真三轴条件下力学特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 349-358.
[8] 韩勇, 李树忱, 袁超, 冯现大, 王修伟, . 单轴压缩下薄喷裂隙红砂岩力学性质与裂纹扩展特征分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2583-2594.
[9] 吴九江, 肖琳, 王丽娟, 张祎, . 基于粒子图像测速技术的节状地下连续墙变形特性与破坏模式研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2707-2718.
[10] 赵崇熙, 徐超, 王清明, 张胜, 李昊煜, . 土工合成材料加筋土桥台极限承载力的离心载荷试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1643-1650.
[11] 颜然, 孔纲强, 于江华, . 砂土地基中钻进比对螺旋桩安装性能和抗拔承载性能的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1778-1788.
[12] 喻文昭, 朱鸿鹄, 王德洋, 谢天铖, 裴华富, 施斌, . 荷载作用下砂土边坡-管道相互作用试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(5): 1309-1320.
[13] 熊根, 付栋康, 朱斌, 赖莹, . 软黏土中吸力锚承载特性离心试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(5): 1472-1480.
[14] 王通, 刘先峰, 袁胜洋, 蒋关鲁, 胡金山, 邵珠杰, 田士军, . 顺倾及反倾层状碎裂结构斜坡地震反应的大型振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(2): 489-501.
[15] 徐文彬, 赵康奇, 张亚伦, 刘成保, 周磊, . 调控层胶结充填体三轴压缩力学性能及破坏特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(12): 3658-3667.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!