岩土力学 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (10): 2942-2952.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2023.0857

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

粉土改良膨胀土的路用性能与现场试验

张艺1,李永强2,章定文1,侯爵3,樊晓军2,唐紫琼1   

  1. 1. 东南大学 交通学院,江苏 南京 211189;2. 中交一公局第三工程有限公司,北京 100000;3. 江苏省交通工程建设局,江苏 南京 210017
  • 收稿日期:2023-06-18 接受日期:2023-07-31 出版日期:2023-10-13 发布日期:2023-10-16
  • 通讯作者: 章定文,男,1978年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事交通岩土工程方面的教学与研究工作。E-mail: zhang@seu.edu.cn E-mail:220213560@seu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:张艺,女,1998年生,硕士研究生,主要从事土壤改良治理方面的研究工作。

Road performance and field test of expansive soil improved by silt

ZHANG Yi1, LI Yong-qiang2, ZHANG Ding-wen1, HOU Jue3, FAN Xiao-jun2, TANG Zi-qiong1   

  1. 1. School of Transportation, Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 211189, China; 2. No. Three Engineering Co., Ltd. of CCCC First Highway Engineering Co., Ltd., Beijing 100000, China; 3. Transportation Engineering Construction Bureau of Jiangsu Province, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210017, China
  • Received:2023-06-18 Accepted:2023-07-31 Online:2023-10-13 Published:2023-10-16

摘要: 为探究粉土对膨胀土的改良效果,对不同粉土占比改良膨胀土进行了胀缩特性、路用性能和微观结构测试。研究表明:掺入粉土改变了膨胀土土体颗粒成分及结构,抑制了膨胀土的胀缩潜势;随着粉土颗粒的增加,膨胀土的密实度和无侧限抗压强度均先增大后减小,最大干密度在粉土占比为40%时达到1.889 g/cm3,无侧限抗压强度在粉土占比为10%时最大,加州承载比(CBR)值持续显著提高,回弹模量呈下降趋势,均满足规范要求;验证了粉土改良膨胀土的可行性,确定了最佳配合比为粉土掺量40%。为便于现场施工,并考虑现场拌和均匀程度,先掺入3%低剂量石灰对膨胀土进行“砂化”,降低膨胀土黏性使其破碎。在此基础上,采用粉土掺量40%对膨胀土进行改良后用于高速公路路堤填筑,并开展了现场压实度、CBR值、弯沉值等测试。现场试验结果表明:现场填筑联合改良试验段和单一石灰改良对照段整体压实质量良好,但试验段压实度易受粉土均匀程度影响而降低;试验段路基CBR值和路基弯沉与对照段相当,粉土改良有效弥补了相对于对照段减少的2%石灰所提供的强度。

关键词: 膨胀土, 粉土, 改良, 胀缩特性, 路用性能

Abstract: To explore the improvement effect of adding silt on expansive soil, the swelling-shrinkage characteristics, road performance and microstructure of expansive soil with different proportions of silt were tested. The results show that the incorporation of silt changes the composition and structure of soil particles, and inhibits the expansion and contraction potential of expansive soil. With the increase of silt particles, the compactness and unconfined compressive strength of expansive soil increase first and then decrease. The maximum dry density reaches 1.889 g/cm3 when the proportion of silt is 40%, and the unconfined compressive strength reaches the maximum when the proportion of silt is 10%. The California bearing ratio (CBR) value continues to increase significantly, and the rebound modulus shows a downward trend. All of these indexes meet the requirements of the specification. The feasibility of using silt to improve expansive soil is verified, and the optimum dosing ratio of silt is determined to be 40%. In order to facilitate onsite construction and consider the uniformity of onsite mixing, 3% low-dosage lime is first added to causes the performance of expansive soil to tend towards those of sandy soil so as to reduce the viscosity of the expansive soil and break it. On this basis, the expansive soil is applied to highway embankment filling after improved with 40% silt content, and onsite compaction degree, CBR value, deflection and other tests are carried out. The field test results show that the overall compaction quality of the experimental section improved by silt and lime and the control section treated by the single lime are controlled well, but the compaction degree of the test section is reduced due to the influence of the uniformity of the silt. The CBR value and subgrade deflection of the test section are comparable to those of the control section, and the silt improvement effectively compensates for the strength provided by the 2% lime reduced relative to the control section.

Key words: expansive soil, silt, improvement, swelling-shrinkage characteristics, road performance

中图分类号: TU443
[1] 姜海波, 卢燕, 李琳, 张军, . 干湿-冻融作用输水渠道膨胀土强度特性及损伤演化规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1356-1367.
[2] 欧阳淼, 张红日, 王桂尧, 邓人睿, 郭鸥, 汪磊, 高游, . 基于响应面法的生物基质改良膨胀土配比优化研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1368-1378.
[3] 郑舒文, 刘松玉, 李迪, 童立元, 吴恺, . 膨胀土基泡沫轻质土力学性能试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1455-1465.
[4] 周振华, 孔令伟, 李甜果, 舒荣军, . 原状膨胀土裂隙演变性状的环境效应与表征[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 402-412.
[5] 潘超钒, 张晨, 张星星, 蔡正银, 王旭东, . 盐渍化粉土的蠕变特征及模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3383-3394.
[6] 陈康, 刘先峰, 蒋关鲁, 袁胜洋, 马杰, 陈忆涵, . 干湿循环下石灰改良红层泥岩填料力学性能劣化规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 43-54.
[7] 陈熠坤, 储亚, 蔡国军, 闫超, 刘松玉, 韩爱民, . 基于低频电法的原位膨胀土膨胀性评价应用研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 147-155.
[8] 张红日, 杨济铭, 徐永福, 肖杰, 韩仲, 汪磊, 林宇亮, . 基于数字图像相关技术的膨胀土三维裂隙扩展特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 309-323.
[9] 郭建华, 王汉辉, 李世昌, 戴张俊, . 干湿环境下膨胀土裂隙演化规律及渠坡变形研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 433-442.
[10] 黎宇, 胡明鉴, 郑思维, 王志兵, . 电石渣-矿渣固化膨胀土强度及微观机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 461-470.
[11] 魏星, 陈睿, 程世涛, 朱明, 王子健, . 成都膨胀土地区深基坑降雨稳定性分析与变形预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 525-534.
[12] 王修伟, 李树忱, 刘祥坤, 万泽恩, 彭科峰, . 考虑温度效应的盾构刀盘黏附试验及堵塞防治[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2299-2310.
[13] 王宽君, 刘彬, 莫品强, 李国耀, 朱启银, 沈侃敏, 胡静, . 考虑粉土温度效应与排水状态的CPTu计算模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1731-1742.
[14] 马田田, 于海文, 韦昌富, 伊盼盼, 姚传芹, . 物理化学效应对膨胀土收缩特性的影响机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(3): 697-704.
[15] 张勇敢, 鲁洋, 刘斯宏, 田金博, 张思钰, 方斌昕. 土工袋抑制膨胀土冻胀性能试验及机制探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(3): 759-768.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!