岩土力学 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (3): 896-907.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2022.0482

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

多排孔注浆引起土体变形与孔压规律试验研究

郭景琢1, 2,郑刚2,赵林嵩2,潘军2,张宗俊2,周强1,程雪松2   

  1. 1. 中国建设基础设施有限公司,北京 100044;2. 天津大学 建筑工程学院,天津 300072
  • 收稿日期:2022-04-10 接受日期:2022-05-30 出版日期:2023-03-21 发布日期:2023-03-24
  • 通讯作者: 程雪松,男,1985年生,博士,副教授,主要从事岩土力学与工程的教学与科研工作。E-mail: cheng_xuesong @163.com E-mail:63431562@qq.com
  • 作者简介:郭景琢,男,1979年生,学士,高级工程师,主要从事基坑、隧道工程建设管理研究。
  • 基金资助:
    中建股份科技研发计划资助(CSCEC-2021-Z-25);中建基础科技研发课题(CSCIC-2020-KT-01);国家自然科学基金(No.52178343)。

Experimental study of soil deformation and pore pressure caused by multi-row grouting

GUO Jing-zhuo1, 2, ZHENG Gang2, ZHAO Lin-song2, PAN Jun2, ZHANG Zong-jun2, ZHOU Qiang1, CHENG Xue-song2   

  1. 1. China Construction Infrastructure Co., Ltd., Beijing 100044, China; 2. School of Civil Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
  • Received:2022-04-10 Accepted:2022-05-30 Online:2023-03-21 Published:2023-03-24
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the R&D Program of China State Construction Engineering Corporation Ltd. (CSCEC-2021-Z-25), the R&D Program of China Construction Infrastructure Co., Ltd., (CSCIC-2020-KT-01), and National Natural Science Foundation of China (52178343).

摘要: 目前尚未见到软土地区多排孔注浆引起土体变形和超孔压发展规律的系统研究,限制了注浆变形主动控制策略的深化发展。开展了多排孔注浆现场试验,系统研究了单排孔逐孔注浆、多排孔逐排注浆引起土体水平位移和超孔压的变化与叠加规律。研究表明,注浆引起的超孔压随距离衰减迅速,变化规律可用幂函数表达,注浆距离取3 m左右时纠偏效果较好;天津地区超孔压消散较快,有利于注浆控制变形的快速稳定,超孔压随时间的消散规律可用指数函数表达,并提出了计算注浆引起超孔压的经验公式;多排孔逐排注浆时,先行注浆形成的注浆体墙对后续注浆一侧及另一侧土体变形分别具有反力效应和遮挡效应,控制既有建构筑物变形时应遵循“先远后近”逐排注浆的原则,以提高变形控制效果。

关键词: 注浆法, 土体变形, 原位试验, 超静孔隙水压力, 多排孔注浆

Abstract: There was no systematic study on the development law of soil deformation and excess pore pressure caused by multi row hole grouting in soft soil area to date, which limits the deepening development of active control strategy of grouting deformation. In this study, field tests of multi-row grouting were carried out to systematically examine the variation and superposition law of soil horizontal displacement and excess pore pressure caused by single-row hole-by-hole grouting and multi-row row-by-row grouting. The research shows that the excess pore pressure caused by grouting decreases rapidly with distance, and the variation law can be expressed by a power function. It is recommended that the grouting is about 3 m or closer to the object. At this time, the grouting correction effect is the best. The excess pore pressure caused by grouting dissipated rapidly in Tianjin, which is conducive to the rapid stability of the deformation controlled by grouting. The dissipation law of excess pore pressure over time can be expressed by an exponential function, and an empirical formula for calculating excess pore pressure caused by grouting is put forward. When multiple rows of holes are grouted row by row, the wall formed by prior grouting has reaction force effect and shielding effect on the soil deformation on one side and the other side of the subsequent grouting respectively. When controlling the deformation of existing buildings and structures, the principle of “far before near” row by row grouting shall be followed so as to improve the effect of deformation control.

Key words: grouting method, soil deformation, in situ test, excess pore water pressure, multi-row grouting

中图分类号: TU433
[1] 张雨坤, 张恒, 李大勇, 项乾, . 桩靴贯入及拔出对邻近吸力基础运动规律和水平承载力的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2325-2338.
[2] 倪睿思, 肖世国, 吴兵, 梁瑶, . 基于非线性井阻的饱和软弱土无砂增压式真空预压分析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2160-2172.
[3] 周光远, 干飞, 郑刚, 周海祚, 王宏, 毕靖, 刘彪, 张元胤, . 基于土体变形的端承桩负摩阻力计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 930-942.
[4] 王彪, 陈星欣, 尹清锋, 郭力群, 何明高, . 软土地层盾构地中对接法孔压扰动规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 535-549.
[5] 季慧, 彭宇, 吴则祥, 涂冬媚, . 砂土中吸力筒基础抗拔数值模拟研究: 系泊深度效应[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 2187-2194.
[6] 余云燕, 丁小刚, 马丽娜, 崔文豪, 杜乾中. 微膨胀泥岩地基原位水分入渗响应特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(3): 647-658.
[7] 王晓磊, 刘理腾, 刘润, 刘历波, 董林, 任海. 地震历史对各深度土体抗液化性影响的振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(9): 2657-2666.
[8] 李波, 唐孟雄, 胡贺松, 刘春林, 凌造, 苏定立, 侯振坤. 随钻跟管桩钻孔卸荷与后注浆效应的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(4): 1044-1052.
[9] 张昕, 董浩, 徐迎迎, 王柳月, . 竖向循环荷载作用下砂土中单桩承载特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(3): 673-684.
[10] 郭凯丰, 张仪萍. 双层地基中气体聚集与土体变形机制的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(1): 99-108.
[11] 安然, 孔令伟, 师文卓, 郭爱国, 张先伟, . 结构性黏土的原位刚度衰减规律及数学表征[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S1): 410-418.
[12] 王心博, 王路君, 朱斌, 王鹏, 袁思敏, 陈云敏, . 水合物储层伺服降压开采模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(9): 2360-2370.
[13] 史旦达, 俞快, 毛逸瑶, 原媛, 郝冬雪, 胡伟, . 松砂中双叶片螺旋锚上拔承载 及土体变形特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(11): 3059-3072.
[14] 侯振坤, 唐孟雄, 胡贺松, 黎剑华, 张树文, 徐晓斌, 刘春林, . 随钻跟管桩竖向承载性能原位试验 与室内物理模拟试验对比研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(2): 419-429.
[15] 王东坡, 何启维, 刘彦辉, 温继伟, 李伟, . 滚石冲击改进型开口帘式网耗能机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(12): 3356-3365.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!