岩土力学 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (7): 2129-2142.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2022.1494

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

地震波斜入射下岩质边坡放大效应的数值模拟研究

申辉1, 2,刘亚群1, 2,刘博1, 2,李海波1, 2   

  1. 1. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071;2. 中国科学院大学,北京 100049
  • 收稿日期:2022-09-26 接受日期:2022-10-31 出版日期:2023-07-17 发布日期:2023-07-16
  • 通讯作者: 刘亚群,男,1974年生,博士,研究员,主要从事动荷载作用下边坡稳定性分析相关研究。E-mail: yqliu@whrsm.ac.cn E-mail:shenhui19@mails.ucas.ac.cn
  • 作者简介:申辉,男,1997年生,博士研究生,主要从事岩质边坡动力响应及稳定性评价相关研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(No.42277176,No.51679231)。

Numerical study on the amplification effect of rock slopes under oblique incidence of seismic waves

SHEN Hui1, 2, LIU Ya-qun1, 2, LIU Bo1, 2, LI Hai-bo1, 2   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • Received:2022-09-26 Accepted:2022-10-31 Online:2023-07-17 Published:2023-07-16
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42277176, 51679231).

摘要: 近源地震中,地震波入射角对岩质边坡的放大效应影响显著。基于黏弹性人工边界理论和等效节点力原理,结合有限单元法建立了可以考虑地震SV波和P波斜入射的地震动输入方法,研究了岩质边坡的坡角、地震波入射角以及入射波类型对边坡放大效应的影响规律。边坡峰值地面加速度(peak ground acceleration,简称PGA)放大系数结果表明,若仅考虑地震波垂直入射的情况,边坡的动力放大效应可能会被严重低估。此外,边坡坡角的变化和入射波类型的改变也对边坡的放大效应有显著的影响。将计算得到的PGA放大系数与相关规范中建议的放大系数对比发现,规范建议值在一些情况下低估了放大效应。边坡坡顶的加速度频谱结果显示,地震波入射角对坡顶加速度傅里叶谱的主频影响较小,但对其傅里叶谱的幅值影响较大。随着SV波入射角的增大,坡顶水平加速度傅里叶谱幅值整体上变化不显著,而竖向加速度傅里叶谱幅值逐渐增大;随着P波入射角的增大,坡顶竖向加速度傅里叶谱幅值逐渐减小而水平向幅值逐渐增大。引入谱比曲线定量评估了不同入射条件下边坡坡顶的谱放大效应,获得了坡顶谱比峰值的变化规律。

关键词: 岩质边坡, 地震波入射角, 地震响应, 地形效应, P波, SV波

Abstract: The influence of the incident angle of seismic waves on the amplification effect of rock slopes is obvious in near-source earthquakes. Based on the theory of viscous-spring artificial boundary and the principle of equivalent nodal force, a seismic input method for oblique incidence of seismic SV and P waves is established and implemented in the finite element method. Various influencing factors such as slope inclination, incident angle of seismic wave, and type of incident wave are considered, and then a numerical study is conducted to investigate the amplification effect of rock slopes. The results of the peak ground acceleration (PGA) amplification factor of the slope show that the amplification effect of the rock slope may be significantly underestimated if only the vertical incidence of seismic waves is considered. In addition, the slope inclination and the type of incident wave also have a significant influence on the amplification effect. By comparing the calculated results of the PGA amplification factor with those suggested by the Code for Seismic Design of Buildings (GB50011―2010), it is found that the values suggested by the seismic code may underestimate the amplification effect in some cases. The results of the spectral characteristics of the acceleration at the slope crest reveal that the incident angle of the seismic waves has little effect on the main frequency of the Fourier spectrum but has a significant effect on the Fourier amplitude. As the incident angle of the SV-wave increases, the Fourier amplitude of vertical acceleration at the slope crest increases, while the variation of Fourier amplitude of horizontal acceleration is not obvious. As the incident angle of P-wave increases, the Fourier amplitude of vertical acceleration at the slope crest decreases while that of horizontal acceleration increases. Finally, the spectral ratio curve is introduced to quantitatively evaluate the effects of different influencing factors on the spectral amplification of slope crest, and the variation pattern of the peak spectral ratio under different incident conditions is obtained.

Key words: rock slope, incident angle of seismic wave, seismic response, topographic effect, P-wave, SV-wave

中图分类号: TU445
[1] 余小越, 许明, 谢强, 蔡宇, 刘先珊, 甘峰帆, . SH波在三角形山体地形中的散射与能量分布规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2639-2649.
[2] 刘健, 夏勇, 江权, 陈涛, 贺维国, 范国刚, 熊先涛, 郑虹, . 强烈构造区硬梁包水电站地下洞室群围岩变形破坏特征与泸定地震响应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2265-2280.
[3] 徐全, 侯靖, 杨剑, 杨昕光, 倪绍虎, 陈鑫. 基于合成岩体技术的岩质边坡稳定性精细化分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2062-2070.
[4] 可文海, 杨文海, 李源, 吴磊, . SH波作用下斜坡地形中桩基的动力响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1545-1544.
[5] 杨景泉, 郑长杰, 丁选明, . 竖向入射P波激励下饱和土中管桩地震响应[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1477-1488.
[6] 刘文静, 邓辉, 周昕. 地震作用下含双层韧性剪切带高陡岩质边坡动力响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3534-3548.
[7] 赵飞, 石振明, 俞松波, 周圆媛, 李博, 陈建峰, 张清照, 郑鸿超. 层状岩质边坡动力失稳及加固研究进展[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3585-3614.
[8] 周鹏发, 闻毓民, 何永辉, 高登, 骆阳, 常铭宇, . 基于改进完美匹配层的非均匀弹性波输入研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3253-3266.
[9] 周桓竹, 刘圣安, 李斌, 陈炜昀, 苏雷, 郑俊杰, 郑烨炜, . 穿越变化地层的沉管隧道接头地震响应的解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 289-298.
[10] 陶志刚, 丰于翔, 赵易, 张晓宇, 何满潮, 雷啸天, . 穿断层隧道NPR锚索支护体系抗震特性振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(4): 939-949.
[11] 梁富源, 谢志南, 卢建旗, 单振东, 齐文浩, 章旭斌, 吕国军, . 斜入射情形场地基本周期的计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(4): 1103-1111.
[12] 任璐瑶, 吴镇杰, 黄啟超, 关振长. 考虑轴力影响的盾构隧道纵向地震响应解析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(10): 2971-2980.
[13] 刘国锋, 冯坤, 晏长根, 丰光亮, 徐鼎平, 周迟, . 考虑力学参数不确定性的岩质边坡开挖卸荷响应概率评价[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(7): 2115-2128.
[14] 吴宏, 叶治, 张宇亭, 刘华北, . 穿越不同密实度饱和砂土地层的盾构隧道地震响应三维数值分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(4): 1204-1216.
[15] 郑长杰, 崔亦秦, 吴琛, 罗通, 栾鲁宝, . 竖向入射S波作用下单桩水平地震响应简化解析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(2): 327-336.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!