岩土力学 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (8): 2318-2326.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2022.1300

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于静力推覆试验的山岭隧道衬砌-地层相互作用机制研究

卢钦武,关振长,林林,吴淑婧,宋德杰   

  1. 福州大学 土木工程学院,福建 福州 350116
  • 收稿日期:2022-08-22 接受日期:2022-12-13 出版日期:2023-08-21 发布日期:2023-08-21
  • 通讯作者: 关振长,男,1980年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事岩土与隧道工程方面的科研和教学工作。E-mail: gaussto@hotmail.com E-mail:lqw5467@163.com
  • 作者简介:卢钦武,男,1995年生,博士研究生,主要从事隧道工程方面研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 52278399);福建省自然科学基金(No. 2021J01599)

Lining- stratum interaction mechanism of mountain tunnel based on static pushover model test

LU Qin-wu, GUAN Zhen-chang, LIN Lin, WU Shu-jing, SONG De-jie   

  1. College of Civil Engineering, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou, Fujian 350116, China
  • Received:2022-08-22 Accepted:2022-12-13 Online:2023-08-21 Published:2023-08-21
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52278399) and the Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province (2021J01599).

摘要: 随着我国交通强国建设向西部丘陵重山地区推进,地震作用下山岭隧道衬砌与地层的相互作用机制愈发受到关注。以常规二车道公路隧道(V级围岩段)为原型,开展山岭隧道静力推覆模型试验,重点分析地层位移、地层应变、围岩压力随推覆距离的变化规律,探讨了衬砌-地层相互作用机制。试验结果表明:衬砌-地层相互作用可分为挤密、倾覆、裹挟3个阶段。倾覆阶段地层以起拱线为支点环向绕流,裹挟阶段地层带动衬砌发生整体位移。起拱附近线地层以径向挤压为主,形成挤压变形区,拱肩附近地层则以环向挤压为主,形成滑移变形区。左右两侧围岩压力的响应规律恰好相反,即右侧挤压区的围岩压力较左侧大,而右侧滑移区的围岩压力较左侧小。研究成果可为基于反应位移法的山岭隧道抗震计算提供试验依据与技术支撑。

关键词: 山岭隧道, 衬砌-地层相互作用机制, 静力推覆模型试验, 数字图像相关, 围岩压力

Abstract: With the rapid development of traffic infrastructure construction in western mountain area, the lining-stratum interaction mechanism of mountain tunnel under seismic effects has attracted increasing attentions. Based on the prototype of a regular two-lane highway tunnel section with V-grade surrounding rock, a static pushover model test for mountain tunnel was conducted. The variations of stratum displacement, stratum strain and ground pressure with pushover distance were carefully studied, and the lining-stratum interaction mechanism was thoroughly discussed. The test results show that: the lining-stratum interaction can be generally divided into compacting stage, overturning stage, and dragging stage. The stratum tends to circumferentially flow along the lining perimeter from the springing line in the overturning stage, and then drives the lining to shift together in the dragging stage. The stratum near the springing line experiences predominantly radial compression, forming a compression deformation zone, while the stratum near the lining shoulder mainly undergoes circumferential compression, forming a slip deformation zone. The response of the ground pressure on the left and right sides are exactly opposite. Specifically, the ground pressure in the compression deformation zone on the right side is greater than its counterpart on the left side, while the ground pressure in the slip deformation zone on the right side is less than its counterpart on the left side. These researches can provide some experimental basis and technical support for the anti-seismic calculation of mountain tunnels based on response displacement method.

Key words: mountain tunnel, lining-stratum interaction mechanism, static pushover model test, digital image correlation, ground pressure

中图分类号: TU 457
[1] 冉龙洲, 袁松, 王希宝, 张廷彪, 刘德军, 黎良仆, . 考虑围岩−盾体−注浆体−管片相互作用的深埋护盾式隧道掘进机法隧道围岩压力计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 366-376.
[2] 曹勇, 余飞, 黄康, 戴张俊, 陈善雄, 张志才, . 随机生成粗糙度的岩石-混凝土界面破坏特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 315-326.
[3] 杜金飞, 杜宇翔, 贾永胜, 孙金山, 姚颖康, 谢全民, 范焜晖, . 水−动力耦合作用下红砂岩变形破坏与能耗分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 248-258.
[4] 张红日, 杨济铭, 徐永福, 肖杰, 韩仲, 汪磊, 林宇亮, . 基于数字图像相关技术的膨胀土三维裂隙扩展特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 309-323.
[5] 张科, 关世豪, 齐飞飞, 徐奕, 金克盛, . 冲刷作用下砂岩宏观力学特性及微观结构[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 1929-1938.
[6] 张朝俊, 吴顺川, 储超群, 庞瑞, . 裂隙砂岩应变场演化与超声时移衰减特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(5): 1284-1296.
[7] 卢钦武, 陈智威, 关振长, 蔡建国, 杨志伟, . 基于静力推覆试验的4车道公路隧道围岩压力计算模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(11): 3315-3323.
[8] 彭阳, 高永涛, 王文林, 甫尔卡特, 温建敏, 周喻, . 单侧限压缩煤岩组合体的破裂机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 387-398.
[9] 高志傲, 孔令伟, 王双娇, 刘炳恒, 芦剑锋, . 平面应变条件下不同裂隙方向原状膨胀土变形破坏性状与剪切带演化特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(9): 2495-2508.
[10] 王磊, 张帅, 刘怀谦, 陈礼鹏, 朱传奇, 李少波, 王安铖, . 冲击荷载下含瓦斯煤能量耗散及损伤破坏规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(7): 1901-1915.
[11] 陈磊, 张广清, 张敏, 曹庾杰, 谌立吉, . 水力裂缝穿越非连续面扩展时的断裂过程研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(1): 159-170.
[12] 刘博, 徐飞, 赵维刚, 高阳, . 隧道工程结构模型试验系统研究综述与展望[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S1): 452-468.
[13] 彭守建, 张倩文, 许江, 陈奕安, 陈灿灿, 曹琦, 饶豪魁, . 基于三维数字图像相关技术的砂岩渗流-应力 耦合变形局部化特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(5): 1197-1206.
[14] 金爱兵, 王杰, 陈帅军, 李海, . 基于不同粒径分布尾砂的充填体强度及 损伤特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(11): 3083-3093.
[15] 史旦达, 俞快, 毛逸瑶, 原媛, 郝冬雪, 胡伟, . 松砂中双叶片螺旋锚上拔承载 及土体变形特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(11): 3059-3072.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!