岩土力学 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (S1): 206-220.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2022.0980

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

渗流条件下隧道锚注复合围岩体的解析方法

周晓敏1, 2，马文著1, 2，张松1，宋宜祥3，刘勇1，和晓楠4   

  1. 1．北京科技大学 土木与资源工程学院，北京 100083；2．北京科技大学 城市地下空间工程北京市重点实验室，北京 100083； 3．河北工业大学 土木与交通学院，天津 300401；4．中国建筑第二工程局有限公司，北京 101149
  • 收稿日期:2022-06-14 接受日期:2022-10-15 出版日期:2023-11-16 发布日期:2023-11-17
  • 通讯作者: 马文著，男，1994年生，博士研究生，主要从事隧道竖井支护方面的解析及数值模拟研究。E-mail: mwz19940302@163.com E-mail:ustb_zhou@163.com
  • 作者简介:周晓敏，男，1963年生，博士，教授，博士生导师，主要从事隧道竖井支护方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金（No. 42272331，No. 51678048，No. 41902290)。

Analytical method for surrounding rock reinforced by bolts-grouting in tunnel under seepage

ZHOU Xiao-min1, 2, MA Wen-zhu1, 2, ZHANG Song1, SONG Yi-xiang3, LIU Yong1, HE Xiao-nan4   

  1. 1. School of Civil and Resource Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing, 100083, China; 2. Beijing Key Laboratory of Urban Underground Space Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China; 3. School of Civil Engineering and Transportation, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300401, China; 4. China Construction Second Engineering Bureau Co., Ltd., Beijing 101149, China
  • Received:2022-06-14 Accepted:2022-10-15 Online:2023-11-16 Published:2023-11-17
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported ty the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42272331, 51678048, 41902290).

PDF (Chinese)

115

摘要： 锚注法是富水隧道工程中常见的地层加固和止水工法，目前仍缺乏可以同时考虑锚杆−围岩力学相互作用和注浆防水抗渗作用的解析理论。以径向锚注复合围岩体为研究对象，基于达西定律和应力均布法将注浆加固后围岩内的孔隙水压力以及锚杆对围岩的相互作用力代入被加固围岩的应力平衡方程，构建出锚注复合围岩体微分方程，求解出复合围岩体及原岩的渗流场、位移场、有效应力场及锚杆轴向应力场的解析解并进行有限元验证和对比。对比结果表明：解析结果与有限解结果一致；与仅注浆的工况相比，锚注加固可改善围岩的应力状态。然后，基于所得解析解，揭示并讨论了锚注加固参数、支护力、二衬抗渗压力等参数和条件对隧道锚注复合围岩体安全系数的影响规律。规律指出：锚注范围、锚杆密度因子及支护力的增加使安全系数分别以先快后慢、准线性及先慢后快的趋势提高；二衬抗渗压力的增加虽然可减小涌水量，但不利于隧道的稳定。最后，基于所提出的解析解给出了锚杆的参数优化设计方法并给出算例。上述研究成果可为渗流隧道的锚注加固设计提供解析理论参考。

关键词: 隧道工程, 锚注加固, 应力均布法, 安全系数, 优化设计

Abstract: Bolts-grouting is a common reinforcement and waterproofing method in water-rich tunnel engineering. At present, there is still a lack of analytical theories that can simultaneously consider the mechanical interaction between rockbolt and surrounding rock, as well as the waterproof and impermeable effects of grouting. Based on Darcy’s law and "smeared" method, a differential equation of rock bolts-grouting composite surrounding rock was established by substituting the pore water pressure in the surrounding rock after grouting reinforcement and the interaction force between the rockbolt and the surrounding rock into the stress equilibrium equation of the reinforced surrounding rock. By solving the proposed differential equation, the closed-form solutions for pore pressure, displacement, and effective stress on bolts-grouting composite surrounding rock, and stress on the rockbolt are obtained and compared with numerical solutions and the solutions of other scholars. The comparison results show that the analytical results are consistent with the finite element solution; and bolts-grouting reinforcement can improve the stress state of surrounding rock compared with grouting only. Furthermore, based on our closed-form solutions, and the effect of bolts-grouting reinforcement parameters, support pressure, impermeability pressure of lining, and diameter of the tunnel on safety factor is elaborated. These laws indicate that with the increases of bolts-grouting range, rockbolts density factor and supporting pressure, the safety factor increases in the ways of first fast then slow, quasi-linear and first slow then fast, respectively. The increase of impermeability pressure on secondary lining can reduce the water inflow, but it is not conducive to the stability of the tunnel. Finally, based our closed-form solutions, we propose the method of parameter optimization for the bolts-grouting reinforcement in the tunnel as well as case study.

Key words: tunnel engineering, bolts-grouting reinforcement, smeared method, safety factor, optimization design

中图分类号: TU 457
[1] 任旺, 苗君, 雷万钧, 王络, 陈益峰, . 混凝土坝坝基立体排水的数值模拟与优化设计[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2281-2295.
[2] 江沂键, 李焕焕, 朱大勇, 凌道盛, . 考虑推力线位置的边坡线性规划模型与极限平衡上下限解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1745-1754.
[3] 张基伟, 张佳鑫, 马文著, 贾红学, 吴卫东, 王传宝. 考虑锚杆滞后支护的竖井围岩加固力学模型半解析研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3395-3409.
[4] 张振波, 李秉欣, 杨茜, 刘志春, 刘义, . 近接基坑工程有限土体失稳模式研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 266-277.
[5] 江学辉, 颜建伟, 罗文俊, 李佳宝, 徐长节. 纵向压力和加固钢板对隧道力学性能影响的解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1623-1632.
[6] 肖明清, 徐晨, 崔岚, 盛谦, 陈健, 谢壁婷, 晏庆明. 基于总安全系数法的系统锚杆支护承载能力试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1743-1754.
[7] 易琪, 孙冠华, 姚院峰, 桂本, 商浩亮, 纪文栋, . 压缩空气储能地下内衬硐库上覆岩体稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(12): 3523-3532.
[8] THENDAR Yoshua, LIM Aswin. 考虑地下连续墙接缝的深基坑RFD系统研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(12): 3717-3727.
[9] 张佳威, 崔臻, 张翔宇, 曹俊, . 高地应力环境下跨活断层隧道抗错断铰接设计试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(11): 3333-3344.
[10] 孙闯, 兰思琦, 陶琦, 关喜彬, 韩希平, . 深埋隧道软弱围岩拱顶三维渐进性塌落机制上限分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(9): 2471-2484.
[11] 张硕成, 陈文化. 考虑不均匀冻胀土体-衬砌隧道在寒区的振动响应[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(5): 1467-1476.
[12] 肖国峰. 改进的岩质凸块的超载储备极限平衡法[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(2): 425-432.
[13] 阮永芬, 张虔, 乔文件, 裴利华, 闫明, 郭宇航, . 基于C-V-T模型的盾构穿越既有桥梁施工风险评估[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(2): 552-562.
[14] 李雨婷, 陈晓斌, 何鹏鹏, . 砂土中海上锚板抗拔极限状态的可靠度分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(12): 3495-3500.
[15] 崔光耀, 麻建飞, 宁茂权, 唐再兴, 刘顺水, 田宇航, . 超大矩形顶管盾构隧道近接下穿高铁施工 加固方案对比分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S2): 414-424.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 《岩土力学》编辑部
地址：湖北武汉武昌小洪山中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所(430071)　邮编：200042　电话：027-87198484　E-mail: ytlx@whrsm.ac.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发