岩土力学 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (S1): 300-308.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2022.1918

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

单轴加载过程中钢渣稳定土细观裂隙的动态演化特征

安然1, 2,陈欣3,张先伟2,王港2, 3,高浩东2   

  1. 1. 合肥工业大学 土木与水利工程学院,安徽 合肥 230099; 2. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室,湖北 武汉430071; 3. 武汉科技大学 城市建设学院,湖北 武汉 430081
  • 收稿日期:2022-12-07 接受日期:2023-01-30 出版日期:2023-11-16 发布日期:2023-11-17
  • 通讯作者: 张先伟,男,1982 年生,博士,研究员,主要从事特殊土土力学基础及应用方面的研究。E-mail: xwzhang@whrsm.ac.cn E-mail:anran@wust.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:安然,男,1992年生,博士,副教授,主要从事岩土体力学行为的多尺度研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.12102312,No.42177148);岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室开放基金项目(No.SKLGME021018)。

Dynamic evolution characteristics of microscopic cracks in steel slag- stabilized soil under uniaxial loading

AN Ran1, 2, CHEN Xin3, ZHANG Xian-wei2, WANG Gang2, 3, GAO Hao-dong 2   

  1. 1. College of Civil Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei, Anhui 230009, China; 2. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 3. School of Urban Construction, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430081, China
  • Received:2022-12-07 Accepted:2023-01-30 Online:2023-11-16 Published:2023-11-17
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (12102312,42177148) and the Open Research Fund of State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering (SKLGME021018).

摘要: 钢渣稳定土是一种新型路基填土,具有非均质、非连续的特点,传统的力学测试方法难以直接研究其细观结构的破坏机制。为了揭示钢渣稳定土的细观损伤特征,开展单轴压缩与X射线计算机断层(computed tomography,简称CT)实时扫描试验,结合图像处理和三维可视化技术,分析了4种应变水平下细观裂隙的动态演化特征。结果表明:在单轴压缩过程中,钢渣稳定土经历了初始压密、弹性变形、塑性屈服和残余变形4个阶段,并在试样中部形成局部剪切带;随着轴向应变的增加,二维裂隙率和裂隙分布的离散程度不断提高;三维重构模型动态地展现了细观裂隙的演化过程,研究发现试样的破坏伴随裂隙的萌发、快速扩展与基本稳定3个发展阶段;三维裂隙率、裂隙连通度与应变分别呈指数函数和线性函数关系;孔径分布结果表明荷载引起原生裂隙的扩张,并逐渐形成主裂隙面,裂隙的扩张和连通是试样发生强度软化和失稳破坏内在原因。单轴压缩−实时CT扫描试验的结果能够有效地揭示材料的损伤演化特征,为工业废渣稳定土结构破坏机制的研究提供了新视角和重要参考作用。

关键词: 钢渣稳定土, 裂隙, 单轴加载, CT扫描, 结构损伤

Abstract: As a new type of subgrade fill, steel slag-stabilized soil was characterized by high heterogeneity and discontinuity. It is difficult to directly study the microscopic characteristics of its failure mechanism through traditional mechanical testing and theoretical analysis methods. In order to reveal the damage mechanism of steel slag-stabilized soil, uniaxial compression tests were conducted combined with a real-time X-ray computed tomography (CT) test, and the dynamic evolution characteristics of microscopic cracks under four typical strain levels were analyzed based on image processing and three-dimensional visualization. The results show that the steel slag-stabilized soil experienced four stages, including initial compaction, elastic deformation, plastic yield and residual deformation. A localized shear band appeared in the middle of the specimen in uniaxial compression process. The two-dimensional porosity and dispersion degree of crack distribution continuously improved with the increasing axial strain. Three-dimensional reconstruction models vividly revealed that the cracks experienced three development stages, including initial germination, rapid expansion and stable state. Three-dimensional porosity and crack connectivity are exponential function and linear function respectively with axial strain. The pore size distributions show that the primary cracks gradually expand and penetrate through the entire specimen and contribute to a main fracture that leads to the structural damage. Thus, the expansion and connection of cracks are the internal reasons of strength softening and instability failure of specimen under uniaxial loading. The uniaxial compression-CT real-time scanning results can effectively reveal the damage evolution characteristics of materials. The research results provide a new perspective for understanding the failure mechanism of soils and have important reference for promoting the application of industrial waste slag in geotechnical engineering.

Key words: steel slag-stabilized soil, cracks, uniaxial loading, CT scanning, structural damage

中图分类号: TU 411
[1] 李槟, 申海萌, 李琦, 李霞颖, . 不同围压条件下花岗岩剪切过程渗透率动态演化规律数值模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 437-453.
[2] 苗日成, 唐贝, 祁飞, 江志安, 崔溦, . 随机裂隙岩体滚刀破岩过程离散元模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 541-552.
[3] 张春瑞, 纪洪广, 付桢, 张月征, 宋宇, 田竹华, 范文博, . 白云石对粉砂岩物理力学性质影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2661-2675.
[4] 刘一鸣, 李振, 冯国瑞, 杨鹏, 白锦文, 黄炳雄, 李东, . 循环加卸载下裂隙砂岩声−热响应特征及前兆规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2773-2791.
[5] 王昕琪, 冯子军, 陈正男, 高祺, 阴伟涛, 靳佩桦, 李玉彬, . 超临界水作用下花岗岩裂隙渗流特性演化规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2847-2858.
[6] 王邺, 王述红, 张泽, 韩博文, 杨润生, . 裂隙及水幕影响下的水封洞库油品运移范围研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2907-2928.
[7] 孙闯, 蒲云波, 敖云鹤, 陶琦, . 冻融饱水裂隙砂岩力学特性及细观破裂演化特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2339-2352.
[8] 王炳文, 刘臣毅, 康明超, 李乾龙, 杨雷, 周森林, 钱垒. 考虑应力的非闭合裂隙岩体损伤机制及裂纹扩展研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2409-2420.
[9] 高帅, 任富强, 常远. 预制单裂隙砂岩注浆过程中的浆液流动特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2505-2515.
[10] 熊飞, 刘新荣, 刘文武, 钟祖良, 杨忠平, 王南云, 王浩, 薛熠, . 含深大裂隙陡崖式岩溶山体采动破坏与失稳机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2516-2531.
[11] 雷瑞德, 顾清恒, 胡超, 贺培, 周林森, . 裂隙砂岩声发射信号特征及破裂前兆识别研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2023-2038.
[12] 姜海波, 卢燕, 李琳, 张军, . 干湿-冻融作用输水渠道膨胀土强度特性及损伤演化规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1356-1367.
[13] 欧阳淼, 张红日, 王桂尧, 邓人睿, 郭鸥, 汪磊, 高游, . 基于响应面法的生物基质改良膨胀土配比优化研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1368-1378.
[14] 王刚, 王恩茂, 隆清明, 徐浩, 陈雪畅, 刘昆轮, . 考虑滤失效应的煤层水力压裂与裂隙扩展关系研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1071-1083.
[15] 申林方, 华涛, 王志良, 李松波, 陈骞. 参数空间变异性对岩石水力压裂裂隙扩展形态的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1294-1302.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!