岩土力学 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (S1): 513-520.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2022.1958

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于核磁共振T2时间分布快速预测不同干密度土体的渗透系数

吴广水1,田慧会2,郝丰富1,王书齐1,杨文洲1,祝婷梅1   

  1. 1. 桂林理工大学 广西建筑新能源与节能重点实验室,广西 桂林 541004; 2. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071
  • 收稿日期:2022-12-15 接受日期:2023-02-28 出版日期:2023-11-16 发布日期:2023-11-19
  • 通讯作者: 田慧会,女,1985年生,博士,副研究员,主要从事核磁共振在多孔介质中水分赋存与迁移方面的研究。E-mail: hhtian@whrsm.ac.cn E-mail:gswu555@163.com
  • 作者简介:吴广水,男,1997年生,硕士研究生,主要从事岩土水分迁移方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(No. 42072312);广西科技基地和人才专项(桂科No. AD20325010);国家自然科学基金重点项目(No. 51939011)。

Rapid prediction of the permeability coefficient for soil of different dry densities with NMR T2 distribution

WU Guang-shui1, TIAN Hui-hui2, HAO Feng-fu1, WANG Shu-qi1, YANG Wen-zhou1, ZHU Ting-mei1   

  1. 1. Guangxi Key Laboratory of New Energy and Building Energy Saving, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin, Guangxi 541004, China; 2. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China
  • Received:2022-12-15 Accepted:2023-02-28 Online:2023-11-16 Published:2023-11-19
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the General Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (42072312), the Department of Science and Technology of Guangxi (AD20325010) and the Key Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (51939011).

摘要: 不同干密度土体因孔隙结构的差异导致其渗透系数不同。同一工程不同位置土体的孔隙结构差异较大,为获得不同位置土体的渗透系数需要对每个位置的土样做变水头试验,这是一个耗时的过程。因此,提出一种快速预测土体不同孔隙结构条件下的渗透系数具有重要的理论和实践意义。基于核磁共振能快速测定孔径分布的优点,建立了一个基于土体T2时间分布快速预测土体渗透系数的毛细管模型。该模型能够利用某一干密度土体的渗透系数,结合土体任意干密度条件下的T2时间分布曲线预测该干密度条件下的渗透系数。研究结果表明:该毛细管模型在预测其他干密度土体渗透系数时,不需要计算横向表面弛豫强度ρ2,进而提高计算渗透系数的效率;核磁共振的每个T2时间概率分布和对应孔隙直径的概率分布相同,将T2时间代入毛细管模型就能直接计算渗透系数;预测的渗透系数和实测值较为一致,说明该方法具有快捷、可靠且不受人为因素干扰的优点。

关键词: 核磁共振, 干密度, 渗透系数, 毛细管模

Abstract: Because of changes in pore structure, the permeability coefficient of soil with different dry densities varies. In the same site, the pore structures of soil at different positions are quite different. In order to obtain the permeability coefficient of soil at different positions, it is necessary to do the falling head permeability test on soil samples from different positions, which is a time-consuming process. Therefore, it is crucial to propose a model for quickly estimating the permeability coefficient of soil with different pore structures. In this paper, a capillary model for rapid prediction of the permeability coefficient of soil using T2 distribution is developed based on the advantages of nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) in quickly determining pore size distribution. With the permeability coefficient of a certain dry density soil and the T2 distribution curves of different dry density soils, the model is able to estimate the permeability coefficient of soil under any dry density condition. The research results show that the capillary model is highly efficient for estimating the permeability coefficient of soil at different dry densities since it does not need to calculate the transverse surface relaxation strength ρ2; The probability of each T2 time value is the same as that of the corresponding pore volumetric probability, and the permeability coefficient can be calculated directly by substituting the T2 time into the capillary model. The predicted results of the model are basically consistent with the measured values, indicating that the method is fast, reliable and unaffected by human behaviors.

Key words: nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), dry density, permeability coefficient, capillary model

中图分类号: TU 433
[1] 张兴文, 曹净, 雷舒羽, 李育红, 程芸, 张柠锐, . 富里酸环境对含腐殖酸水泥土结构及渗透性影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 249-261.
[2] 曹瑞栋, 刘斯宏, 田金博, 鲁洋, 张勇敢, 李帆, . 考虑拉伸的土工袋体织物渗流特性试验及预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2711-2720.
[3] 刘文林, 鄂天龙, 冯杨州, 牛松荧, 张子堂, 孙熠, 陈宏信, . 纳米改性地聚合物隔离墙材料基本工程特性及冻融循环耐久性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2039-2048.
[4] 宋勇军, 卢云龙, 王双龙, 谢丽君, 操警辉, 安旭晨, . 岩石冻融过程未冻水含量演化特征及对力学特性影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1049-1059.
[5] 崔雯雯, 董晓强, 刘晓勇, 赵睿阳, 贺高乐, 张蒙, 周磊, 武学文, . 赤泥基胶凝材料的水化动力学过程及其水化机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 867-880.
[6] 宋二波, 姚仰平, 牛玺荣, . 基于加速度峰值的填土智能压实质量评价方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3054-3064.
[7] 王莘晴, 张晓超, 裴向军, . 弃渣土体分形级配方程及最大干密度预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3157-3166.
[8] 贺元源, 彭绮澜, 王力, 王世梅, 佴磊, 徐燕, 吕岩, 陈勇, 张先伟, . 基于多微观手段的季冻区草炭土孔隙特征和渗透性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 110-122.
[9] 郑思维, 胡明鉴, 霍玉龙, . 钙质砂渗透性影响因素及预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 217-224.
[10] 郝丰富, 马田田, 于海文, 韦昌富, 田慧会, 伊盼盼, . 阳离子交换量对膨润土层间水化影响的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2611-2620.
[11] 崔允亮, 潘方然, 高楥园, 金子原, . 真空预压淤堵区渗透系数的计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 2085-2093.
[12] 王新志, 黄鹏, 雷学文, 文东升, 丁浩桢, 刘铠诚, . 硫酸锌胶结珊瑚砂渗透特性试验及工程应用探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 2094-2104.
[13] 赵再昆, 王铁行, 张亮, 金鑫, 鲁洁, 阮嘉斌, 邢昱, . 高温作用下非饱和黄土裂隙演化及其定量分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(5): 1297-1308.
[14] 刘汉香, 叶刁瑜, 别鹏飞, 朱星, . 循环加卸载过程中灰岩微细观损伤特征的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(3): 685-696.
[15] 张勇敢, 鲁洋, 刘斯宏, 田金博, 张思钰, 方斌昕. 土工袋抑制膨胀土冻胀性能试验及机制探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(3): 759-768.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!