岩土力学 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (1): 284-301.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2022.1822

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

铁路路基动力响应的2.5D有限元方法研究现状及展望

王瑞,胡志平   

  1. 长安大学 建筑工程学院,陕西 西安 710061
  • 收稿日期:2022-11-22 接受日期:2023-01-16 出版日期:2024-01-10 发布日期:2024-01-17
  • 通讯作者: 胡志平,男,1973年生,博士,教授,主要从事路基工程及地下空间防灾方面的研究工作。E-mail: huzhping@chd.edu.cn E-mail:wangrui@chd.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:王瑞,男,1992年生,博士,讲师,主要从事铁路路基动力响应及地下空间防灾方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.42077248);陕西省自然科学基础研究计划(No.2022JQ-435);陕西省城市地质与地下空间工程技术研究中心开放课题(No.2022KT-02)。

Current situation and prospects of 2.5D finite element method for the analysis of dynamic response of railway subgrade

WANG Rui, HU Zhi-ping   

  1. School of Civil Engineering, Chang’an University, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710061, China
  • Received:2022-11-22 Accepted:2023-01-16 Online:2024-01-10 Published:2024-01-17
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42077248), the Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province(2022JQ-435) and the Open Research of Urban Geology and Underground Space Engineering Technology Research Center of Shaanxi Province (2022KT-02).

摘要: 作为一种频域计算方法,2.5D有限元具备计算效率高、内存占用小等优势,同时也存在诸多局限。经过20余年的发展,2.5D有限元方法已经具备了描述复杂土体本构关系和复杂路基几何特征条件下铁路路基动力响应的能力。荷载输入方法、建模策略和波动吸收边界的持续优化使得2.5D有限元方法的精度不断提高,二维插值方法则为进一步提升计算效率提供了思路。目前,2.5D有限元已经成为铁路路基动力响应研究中的常用方法。为了理清铁路路基动力响应2.5D有限元方法的发展脉络,分别从荷载输入、路基系统、响应输出和计算精度及效率的提升方面总结了其发展现状,介绍了2.5D有限元在发展过程中遇到的瓶颈问题及解决对策。在此基础上,针对算法的精度和效率、研究的对象和内容进行了进一步的讨论和展望。

关键词: 2.5D有限元方法, 铁路路基, 动力响应, 建模, 吸收边界, 二维插值

Abstract: The 2.5D finite element method is a frequency-domain method that offers advantages such as high computing efficiency and low memory consumption. Over the past two decades, continuous improvements have been made to this method, enabling it to accurately describe the dynamic response of railway subgrades by considering complex soil constitutive relationships and geometric characteristics. Through advancements in load input methods, modeling strategies, and wave absorption boundaries, the accuracy of the 2.5D finite element method has been steadily improved. The 2D interpolation method has also been employed to enhance computational efficiency for random dynamic responses of subgrades. As a result, the 2.5D finite element method has become a commonly used approach in the study of dynamic responses of railway subgrades. To provide a comprehensive understanding of the development of the 2.5D finite element method in researching the dynamic response of railway subgrades, this paper summarizes the current development status from various perspectives, including load input, subgrade system, response output, and improvements in calculation accuracy and efficiency. The paper also addresses bottleneck problems and proposes corresponding solutions. Based on these findings, further discussions and prospects are presented regarding the algorithm’s accuracy and efficiency, as well as the research objectives and content. This paper serves as a valuable reference for future research endeavors, offering insights into the advancements of the 2.5D finite element method in studying the dynamic response of railway subgrades.

Key words: 2.5D finite element method, railway subgrade, dynamic response, modeling, absorbing boundary, 2D interpolation

中图分类号: TU435
[1] 可文海, 杨文海, 李源, 吴磊, . SH波作用下斜坡地形中桩基的动力响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1545-1544.
[2] 周建, 廖星川, 刘福深, 尚肖楠, 沈君逸, . 应用卷积近场动力学快速模拟随机裂纹扩展[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 625-639.
[3] 刘文静, 邓辉, 周昕. 地震作用下含双层韧性剪切带高陡岩质边坡动力响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3534-3548.
[4] 谢周州, 赵炼恒, 李亮, 黄栋梁, 张子健, 周靖, . 基于振动台试验的不同含石率土-石混合体边坡地震动响应差异性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2324-2337.
[5] 李福秀, 郭文灏, 郑烨炜. 刚性墙面双面加筋土挡墙动力响应振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 1957-1966.
[6] 王智德, 司莹莹, 李杰, 钱梦凡, 安佳兴, . 低应变率冲击荷载下节理花岗岩的动力响应规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1755-1762.
[7] 朱丹, 蒋关鲁, 陈虹羽, 赵鑫辉, 黄德贵, 刘乙甫, . 单、双排桩支护路堑边坡动力响应特性的振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1763-1777.
[8] 王滢, 赵彩清, 王海萍, . 隧道内爆炸荷载作用下衬砌及周围非饱和土的动力响应解答[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(4): 1026-1038.
[9] 周慧颖, 李树忱, 王曼灵, 袁超, 张俊艇, 冯健鹏, . 气孔杏仁状玄武岩随机三维模型构建与 单轴压缩力学行为研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(4): 1214-1232.
[10] 黄超, 钱建固, . 水锤作用下饱和地基蓄排水隧道的动力响应[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(12): 3802-3814.
[11] 张聪, 冯忠居, 林路宇, 周桂梅, 陈露, . 震陷场地变截面单桩动力特性与损伤评价[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(10): 3037-3046.
[12] 李小信, 何超, 周顺华, 李晖, . 具有不规则界面的层状地基三维动力响应的薄层法[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 655-668.
[13] 冯海洲, 蒋关鲁, 何梓雷, 郭玉丰, 胡金山, 李杰, 袁胜洋, . 预应力锚索桩板墙加固隧道洞口边坡的动力响应特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 50-62.
[14] 王志颖, 郭明珠, 曾金艳, 王晨, 刘晃. 地震作用下含软弱夹层顺层岩质斜坡 动力响应的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(9): 2566-2578.
[15] 张硕成, 陈文化. 考虑不均匀冻胀土体-衬砌隧道在寒区的振动响应[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(5): 1467-1476.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!