岩土力学 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (10): 2971-2980.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2023.1902

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

考虑轴力影响的盾构隧道纵向地震响应解析

任璐瑶,吴镇杰,黄啟超,关振长   

  1. 福州大学 土木工程学院,福建 福州 350116
  • 收稿日期:2023-12-20 接受日期:2024-05-17 出版日期:2024-10-09 发布日期:2024-10-11
  • 通讯作者: 关振长,男,1980年生,博士,教授,主要从事地下结构防震减灾等方面的研究工作。E-mail: gaussto@hotmail.com
  • 作者简介:任璐瑶,男,1996年生,博士研究生,主要从事隧道工程抗震方面的研究工作。E-mail: 1091465950@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.52278399)。

Analytical study on longitudinal seismic response of shield tunnels considering axial force

REN Lu-yao, WU Zhen-jie, HUANG Qi-chao, GUAN Zhen-chang   

  1. College of Civil Engineering, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou, Fujian 350116, China
  • Received:2023-12-20 Accepted:2024-05-17 Online:2024-10-09 Published:2024-10-11
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52278399).

摘要: 如何合理估算盾构隧道的地震响应,一直是业界和学界关注的研究热点。相较于横断面地震响应,盾构隧道的纵向地震响应更为复杂。将盾构隧道视为Winkler地基上的Timoshenko梁,考虑轴力影响,包括残余轴力和纵向地震附加轴力,提出纵向与横向地层位移共同作用的理论计算模型,并通过有限差分方法求解盾构隧道纵向地震响应。依托常规6.2 m级错缝拼装的盾构隧道进行算例验证,考虑轴力影响使得盾构隧道整体刚度得以提高,内力与变形响应均有所减小;若不考虑轴力影响,则可退化为传统计算方法。进一步地,通过参数敏感性分析探讨了隧道残余轴力、地基反力系数、地震波入射角及波长对盾构隧道纵向地震响应的影响规律。结果表明:残余轴力越大,等效梁整体刚度提升越大,盾构隧道地震响应越小;且入射角小于45°时,残余轴力对隧道地震响应的影响更加显著。地基反力系数越大,隧道整体挠度和环间局部非连续变形均越大;波长在20~100 m范围内的地震波更容易导致隧道环缝间发生较大的张开和错台。以上研究成果可为盾构隧道纵向抗震设计提供理论支撑。

关键词: 盾构隧道, 纵向地震响应, Timoshenko梁, 有限差分解

Abstract: How to estimate the seismic response of shield tunnels reasonably has been a significant issue in both industry and academia. Compared with the transverse seismic response, the longitudinal seismic response is more complex. The shield tunnel is modeled as a Timoshenko beam on Winkler foundations, considering both residual axial force and additional axial force due to longitudinal seismic. A theoretical model was presented to consider the longitudinal and transverse stratum displacements. The longitudinal seismic response of shield tunnels was solved using the finite difference method. The theoretical model and calculation method were validated through case studies of stagger-assembled shield tunnels with a 6.2 m diameter. Considering axial force increased the overall stiffness of shield tunnel, resulting in decreased internal force and deformation response. The proposed method was degraded to the traditional one when the axial force is neglected. The influences of residual axial force, seismic wavelength, seismic incidence angle and foundation reaction coefficient on the longitudinal seismic response were further explored. With the increase of residual axial force, the overall stiffness of shield tunnel increased, and the peak seismic response of shield tunnel decreased. When the incident angle is less than 45°, the influences of residual axial force and foundation reaction coefficient on the peak response were more significant. With the increase of the foundation reaction coefficient, the tunnel deflection and the discontinuous deformation between joints increased. Wavelengths between 20 m and 100 m may lead to greater opening and dislocation between joints. These studies can provide theoretical support for the longitudinal seismic design of shield tunnels.

Key words: shield tunnel, longitudinal seismic response, Timoshenko beam, finite difference solution

中图分类号: TU 45
[1] 黄大维, 卢文剑, 罗文俊, 余珏, . 盾构隧道同步注浆对砂土地层竖向位移与周围土压力影响试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2837-2846.
[2] 宋牧原, 杨明辉, 陈伟, 卢贤锥, . 基于自注意力-循环神经网络模型的盾构引发的土体沉降预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2613-2625.
[3] 宋利埼, 章敏, 徐筱, 孙静雯, 俞奎, 李昕尧, . 考虑管片接头转动效应的盾构隧道光纤反演分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2483-2494.
[4] 宋伟涛, 张佩, 杜修力, 林庆涛, . 土性对浅埋盾构隧道施工地层响应影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2179-2188.
[5] 黄明华, 钟煜轩, 陆锦斌, 王克平. 基于非连续地基梁模型的基坑开挖诱发下卧盾构隧道变形分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 492-504.
[6] 真嘉捷, 赖丰文, 黄明, 廖清香, 李爽, 段岳强. 基于时序聚类和在线学习的盾构掘进地层智能识别方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3615-3625.
[7] 谢立夫, 关振长, 黄明, 丘华生, 许超. 考虑主动铰接的盾构-地层相互作用模型及求解研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3574-3584.
[8] 黄大维, 刘家璇, 谭满生, 邓翔浩, 黄永亮, 翁友华, 陈升平, . 盾构隧道底部注浆抬升模拟试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 371-381.
[9] 王小刚, 杨建平, 陈卫忠, 李慧, . 盾构隧道结构响应特征及接缝刚度分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 485-495.
[10] 张治国, 沃巍, 朱正国, 韩凯航, 孙苗苗, . 考虑衬砌截面协调变形约束的既有隧道受盾构下穿施工影响的Fourier能量变分解[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(5): 1397-1411.
[11] 张治国, 罗杰, 朱正国, PAN Y T, 孙苗苗, . 基于极限分析上限法的地震作用下分层地基 盾构隧道开挖面稳定性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(4): 1201-1213.
[12] 潘秋景, 吴洪涛, 张子龙, 宋克志, . 基于多域物理信息神经网络的复合地层隧道掘进地表沉降预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(2): 539-551.
[13] 黄继辉, 秦世康, 赵昱, 陈景煦, 张浩, . 压气法盾构仓内气压与围岩气−液两相流相互作用模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(12): 3555-3565.
[14] 李文博, 甘晓露, 刘念武, 吴昊, 谌珊珊. 基于短梁−弹簧模型的盾构隧道施工期上浮变形计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(12): 3755-3767.
[15] 真嘉捷, 赖丰文, 黄明, 李爽, 许凯. 基于LightGBM-Informer的盾构隧道管片上浮长时间序列预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(12): 3791-3801.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!