岩土力学 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (12): 3802-3814.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.0235

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    

水锤作用下饱和地基蓄排水隧道的动力响应

黄超1,钱建固1, 2, 3   

  1. 1. 同济大学 地下建筑与工程系,上海 200092;2. 同济大学 土木工程防灾减灾全国重点实验室,上海 200092; 3. 新疆大学 建筑工程学院,新疆 乌鲁木齐 830047
  • 收稿日期:2024-02-27 接受日期:2024-04-18 出版日期:2024-12-09 发布日期:2024-12-05
  • 通讯作者: 钱建固,男,1972年生,博士,教授,主要从事土力学与地下工程等方面的研究工作。E-mail: qianjiangu@tongji.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:黄超,男,1998年生,硕士研究生,主要从事岩土工程数值方法的研究。E-mail: 2132469@tongji.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.52178345)

Dynamic response of storage and drainage tunnel in saturated ground under water hammer

HUANG Chao1, QIAN Jian-gu1, 2, 3   

  1. 1. Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; 2. State Key Laboratory of Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; 3. College of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Xinjiang University, Urumqi, Xinjiang 830047, China
  • Received:2024-02-27 Accepted:2024-04-18 Online:2024-12-09 Published:2024-12-05
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52178345).

摘要: 针对饱和土地基中深埋蓄排水隧道在水锤作用下的三维动力响应问题,建立了流体−衬砌−饱和土地基系统的频域有限元与边界元耦合模型。隧道内流体视为无黏性、微可压缩性流体,将隧道衬砌结构模拟为弹性介质,用弹性多孔介质模拟饱和土地基。采用频域有限元法分别求解隧道内流体和衬砌的动力控制方程;采用频域边界元方法求解饱和土地基的动力控制方程。基于流体−衬砌接触面和衬砌−饱和土地基接触面的位移一致、面力平衡及完全不透水边界条件,实现了频域有限元与边界元模型的耦合求解。与以往研究的对比验证了新建模型的正确性。利用该模型计算了蓄排水隧道在水锤作用下的内水压(水锤荷载)和周边饱和土体的位移及孔隙水压力响应。结果表明:(1)水锤作用下的动力响应呈现出显著的周期性和衰减性;(2)土体径向位移幅值显著大于轴向位移幅值;(3)将地基简化为单相弹性介质会导致动力响应评估不准确;(4)水锤作用会对隧道周边广大的区域内造成显著的影响;(5)土体的渗透性越差,隧道内流体压力、土体位移和孔隙水压力的峰值越小。

关键词: 水锤, 蓄排水隧道, 有限元-边界元, 饱和土, 动力响应

Abstract: To investigate the three-dimensional dynamic response of a deeply buried storage and drainage tunnel in saturated soil subjected to water hammer, we propose a frequency-domain finite element method and boundary element method (FEM-BEM) coupling model for the fluid-lining-saturated soil system. The fluid is modeled as an inviscid and compressible fluid, the lining as an elastic medium conceptualized as a hollow cylinder of finite length, and the soil as a saturated poroelastic medium. Initially, the governing equations for the fluid and lining are solved using FEM in the frequency domain, while those for the soil are solved using BEM in the same domain. In the following, fluid, lining, and soil are coupled based on the conditions of deformation compatibility, force equilibrium, and impermeable boundary conditions at their interfaces. The presented model is verified through the comparison with the existing models. Finally, a case study of internal water pressure (water-hammer load) and the displacement and pore pressure of the saturated soil in a fluid-filled lined tunnel due to water hammer is presented. The results show that: (1) The dynamic response caused by the water hammer presents significant periodicity and attenuation. (2) The radial displacement of soil is significantly larger than that of axial displacement. (3) Modeling soil as a single-phase elastic medium inaccurately evaluates the dynamic response. (4) The water hammer makes an extensive impact on the ground surrounding the storage and drainage tunnel. (5) The peak values of internal fluid pressure, the soil displacement and pore pressure decrease with the decrease of soil permeability.

Key words: water hammer, storage and drainage tunnel, finite element method and boundary element method (FEM-BEM), saturated soil, dynamic response

中图分类号: TU435
[1] 江文豪, 王浩, 廖光志, 陈滨华, . 时变降雨场景下双层非饱和土中水分一维瞬态渗流解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2721-2737.
[2] 方薇, 吴润丰, 周春梅, . 基于包络壳模型的非饱和土朗肯被动土压力[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2885-2893.
[3] 张振光, 徐杰, 范家燊, . 不排水条件下非饱和土球孔扩张的塑性新解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 1988-1996.
[4] 杨景泉, 郑长杰, 丁选明, . 竖向入射P波激励下饱和土中管桩地震响应[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1477-1488.
[5] 可文海, 杨文海, 李源, 吴磊, . SH波作用下斜坡地形中桩基的动力响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1545-1544.
[6] 尚召伟, 孔令伟, 鄢俊彪, 高志傲, 王斐, 黎澄生, . 非饱和花岗岩残积土的小应变剪切模量特性与其持水特征曲线确定方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1131-1140.
[7] 刘文静, 邓辉, 周昕. 地震作用下含双层韧性剪切带高陡岩质边坡动力响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3534-3548.
[8] 张振光, 徐杰, 李海祥, . 考虑中间主应力的非饱和土竖井主动土压力滑移线解答[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3045-3053.
[9] 何颖, 陈雅, 尹奔驰, 刘中宪, 刘旭, . 频率相关等效线性山谷交错场地多点地震动模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3280-3288.
[10] 谢周州, 赵炼恒, 李亮, 黄栋梁, 张子健, 周靖, . 基于振动台试验的不同含石率土-石混合体边坡地震动响应差异性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2324-2337.
[11] 叶云雪, 易博文, 刘小文, 吴珺华, 洪本根, . 脱湿路径下土体水分变化路径及体积变形对滤纸法测定土-水特征曲线的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2351-2361.
[12] 李福秀, 郭文灏, 郑烨炜. 刚性墙面双面加筋土挡墙动力响应振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 1957-1966.
[13] 王智德, 司莹莹, 李杰, 钱梦凡, 安佳兴, . 低应变率冲击荷载下节理花岗岩的动力响应规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1755-1762.
[14] 朱丹, 蒋关鲁, 陈虹羽, 赵鑫辉, 黄德贵, 刘乙甫, . 单、双排桩支护路堑边坡动力响应特性的振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1763-1777.
[15] 柳鸿博, 戴国亮, 周凤玺, 龚志宇, 陈智伟, . 黏弹性非饱和土中劲性复合桩纵向动力响应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(5): 1365-1377.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!