岩土力学 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (2): 353-363.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2023.0307

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

单、双孔隙结构非饱和黏土孔隙分布变化规律试验研究

张思奇1, 2,裴华富1,谭道远3,朱鸿鹄3   

  1. 1. 大连理工大学 海岸和近海工程国家重点实验室,辽宁 大连 116024; 2. 香港理工大学 土木与环境工程学系,香港;3. 南京大学 地球科学与工程学院,江苏 南京 210023
  • 收稿日期:2023-03-13 接受日期:2023-05-04 出版日期:2024-02-11 发布日期:2024-02-06
  • 通讯作者: 裴华富,男,1983年生,博士,教授,主要从事岩土工程方面的教学与科研工作。E-mail: huafupei@dlut.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:张思奇,男,1993年生,博士,博士后,主要从事非饱和土力学与微观土力学等方面的研究。siqi9315.zhang@polyu.edu.hk
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 52122805,No.52078103)

Experimental study on the variation pattern of pore size distributions for unsaturated clay with single or double pore structure

ZHANG Si-qi1, 2, PEI Hua-fu1, TAN Dao-yuan3, ZHU Hong-hu3   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Coastal and Offshore Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, Liaoning 116024, China; 2. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China; 3. School of Earth Sciences and Engineering, Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210023, China
  • Received:2023-03-13 Accepted:2023-05-04 Online:2024-02-11 Published:2024-02-06
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52122805,52078103).

摘要: 由于孔隙分布曲线的复杂性,在非饱和过程中黏土的孔隙结构变化规律尚不明晰,这导致基于孔隙分布模型计算土-水特征曲线存在较大的误差。针对这一问题,基于干缩试验与压汞试验,对单孔与双孔结构重塑黏土在脱湿过程中孔隙分布曲线的变化规律进行了定量分析。研究表明:在脱湿过程中孔隙分布曲线存在平移、缩放等变换。构建了t分布和双t分布函数,提取了孔隙分布曲线的自由度、峰值、峰值对应的孔隙直径作为特征参数来表征孔隙分布变化规律,发现了特征参数和土样孔隙比之间存在较好的线性关系。基于试验结果,建立了含水率-孔隙比-孔隙分布曲线关系,提出了一个考虑孔隙结构变化的重塑黏土土-水特征曲线计算框架。最后,与试验测得的土-水特征曲线进行比较,验证了所提出的计算方法的准确性。

关键词: 黏土, 非饱和土, 孔隙分布曲线, 压汞试验, 土-水特征曲线, 干缩试验

Abstract: Due to the complexity of the pore size distribution (PSD), the variation pattern of the pore structure for clay during the drying process is not clear, which leads to an inaccurate calculation of the soil-water characteristic curve (SWCC) based on the pore distribution model. To address this issue, a study was conducted to quantitatively analyze the PSD of remodeled clay with the single or double pore structure during the drying process based on the shrinkage test and mercury intrusion porosimetry test. The results revealed that there were translational and scaling transformations of the PSDs during the drying process. The t-distribution and double t-distribution functions were proposed to describe the PSDs of clay. The degrees of freedom, the peaks and the pore diameters corresponding to the PSD peaks were extracted as characteristic parameters to characterize the variation of PSDs. Good linear relationships between the characteristic parameters and the void ratio of remodeled clay were observed. Based on these findings, the relationship of water content-void ratio-pore size distribution was further established, and a framework for calculating the SWCC of remolded clay considering the variation of pore structure was proposed. Finally, the accuracy of the proposed calculation method was verified by comparing with the experimentally measured SWCC.

Key words: clay, unsaturated soil, pore size distribution, mercury intrusion porosimetry test, soil-water characteristic curve, shrinkage test

中图分类号: TU 442
[1] 段书苏, 候志强, 王志佳, 胡俊, 张友良, 张建经. D-山梨醇对微生物诱导碳酸钙沉积作用效果及加固红黏土试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 238-248.
[2] 江文豪, 王浩, 廖光志, 陈滨华, . 时变降雨场景下双层非饱和土中水分一维瞬态渗流解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2721-2737.
[3] 方薇, 吴润丰, 周春梅, . 基于包络壳模型的非饱和土朗肯被动土压力[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2885-2893.
[4] 张振光, 徐杰, 范家燊, . 不排水条件下非饱和土球孔扩张的塑性新解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 1988-1996.
[5] 曹祎, 荣传新, 王衍森, 常磊, 王彬, . 冻结钙质黏土复杂应力路径下的力学响应及本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2071-2084.
[6] 吴青钱, 石露, 李小春, 白冰, . 水/超临界CO2对低黏土含量砂岩力学性质影响的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1442-1454.
[7] 尚召伟, 孔令伟, 鄢俊彪, 高志傲, 王斐, 黎澄生, . 非饱和花岗岩残积土的小应变剪切模量特性与其持水特征曲线确定方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1131-1140.
[8] 王梦洁, 张莎莎, 杨晓华, 张超, 晏长根, . 循环荷载作用下漫灌区粉质黏土的动力特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1215-1227.
[9] 周波翰, 张文利, 王栋. 球形贯入仪预测超固结土强度的数值研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1303-1309.
[10] 徐斌, 陈柯好, 庞锐, . 超固结黏土的剪胀方程及边界面模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 449-456.
[11] 杨明云, 陈川, 赖莹, 陈云敏. 串联锚在黏土中的三向受荷承载力分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 582-590.
[12] KOCHARYAN Gevorg, OSTAPCHUK Alexey, SHATUNOV Ivan, 戚承志. 含黏土断层滑动行为稳定性[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3513-3522.
[13] 张振光, 徐杰, 李海祥, . 考虑中间主应力的非饱和土竖井主动土压力滑移线解答[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3045-3053.
[14] 娄旭龙, 张泽瑞, 孔德琼, 陈星潮, 朱斌, . 深海重型管道管土相互作用大变形极限分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3234-3242.
[15] 张高翔, 刘艳, 刘志强, . 土-水特征曲线的动态效应试验及模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 178-186.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!