岩土力学 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (3): 737-749.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2023.1041

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

跨煤岩界面穿层压裂裂缝动态扩展特征试验研究

李浩哲1, 2,姜在炳2,范宗洋3,庞涛1, 2,刘修刚2, 4   

  1. 1. 煤炭科学研究总院,北京 100013;2. 中煤科工西安研究院(集团)有限公司,陕西 西安 710077; 3. 中国石油大学(北京) 石油工程学院,北京 102249;4. 中国矿业大学(北京)应急管理与安全工程学院,北京 100083
  • 收稿日期:2023-07-17 接受日期:2023-10-13 出版日期:2024-03-11 发布日期:2024-03-20
  • 通讯作者: 姜在炳,男,1970年生,研究员,博士生导师,主要从事煤地质与煤层气开发相关研究工作。E-mail: jiangzaibing@cctegxian.com
  • 作者简介:李浩哲,男,1990年生,助理研究员,博士研究生,主要从事煤层气开发与储层改造相关研究工作。E-mail: lihaozhe@cctegxian.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家科技重大专项(No.2016ZX05045002);天地科技创新创业资金专项重点项目(No.2022-2-TD-ZD007)。

Experimental study on dynamic propagation characteristics of fracturing crack across coal-rock interface

LI Hao-zhe1, 2, JIANG Zai-bing2, FAN Zong-yang3, PANG Tao1, 2, LIU Xiu-gang2, 4   

  1. 1. China Coal Research Institute, Beijing 100013, China; 2. CCTEG Xi’an Research Institute (Group) Co., Ltd., Xi’an, Shaanxi 710077, China; 3. College of Petroleum Engineering, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, China; 4. College of Emergency Management and Safety Engineering, China University of Minim and Technology-Beijing, Beijing 100083, China
  • Received:2023-07-17 Accepted:2023-10-13 Online:2024-03-11 Published:2024-03-20
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Science and Technology Major Project (2016ZX05045002) and the Tiandi Science and Technology Innovation and Entrepreneurship Fund Special Key Project (2022-2-TD-ZD007).

摘要: 针对跨煤岩界面穿层压裂裂缝动态扩展过程,采用相似材料制作煤岩组合体试件,开展三点弯曲试验、真三轴水力压裂物理模拟试验,分别结合数字散斑技术、声发射监测技术,捕捉裂缝的动态扩展特征,分析裂缝扩展形态及影响因素。结果表明:三点弯曲试验中裂缝可从顶板直接进入煤层,裂缝在界面处未转向,增大预制裂缝长度试件断裂所需的峰值应力降低;真三轴水力压裂试验条件下,由于煤层塑性强,顶板内裂缝高度、长度均大于煤层,顶板内声发射事件比例高于煤层;在裂缝穿层扩展的前提下,增大水平井与煤层顶面距离会导致裂缝穿层扩展时间延长,提高压裂液注入排量可增大裂缝进入煤层的穿透深度,但是易导致缝高失控、缝长降低,提出采用变排量压裂施工,初期压裂液大排量注入促使裂缝纵向穿层,随后降排量促进裂缝在顶板和煤层内横向延伸;多裂缝同步起裂时缝间存在竞争扩展现象,部分裂缝可能无法穿层扩展。研究成果可为掌握裂缝跨煤岩界面穿层扩展特点、优化设计压裂施工参数提供理论支撑。

关键词: 煤岩界面, 穿层压裂, 动态扩展, 数字散斑, 声发射

Abstract: To investigate the dynamic propagation process of the fracturing crack across the coal-rock interface, similar materials were used to prepare coal-rock combined specimens. Three-point bending tests and true triaxial hydraulic fracturing tests were carried out. By the digital speckle technology and the acoustic emission (AE) technology, the dynamic propagation characteristics of the fracturing crack were captured. The fracture pattern and its influencing factors were analyzed. The results show that in the three-point bending test, the crack can penetrate into the coal seam directly from the roof without changing direction at the interface. The peak stress required for the specimen fracturing is reduced while increasing the prefabricated crack length. In the true triaxial hydraulic fracturing test, due to the strong plasticity of the coal seam, the crack height and length in the roof are both larger than those in the coal seam, and the proportion of acoustic emission events in the roof is also higher than that in the coal seam. When the crack propagates across layers, increasing the distance between the horizontal well and the top surface of the coal seam will lead to the extension of the crack propagation time. Increasing the injection rate of the fracturing fluid can increase the penetration depth of the crack into the coal seam, but it is easy to cause the crack height to be out of control and the reduction of crack length. The fracturing method with variable injection rates was proposed. In the initial stage, the fracturing fluid injection with a large rate promotes the crack propagation across layers, and then the injection rate is reduced to promote the lateral propagation of the crack in the roof and coal seam. There is a competitive propagation phenomenon among cracks when multiple cracks are initiated synchronously, and part of the cracks can not propagate across layers. The research results can provide support for mastering the propagation characteristics of the crack across the coal-rock interface and optimizing the hydraulic fracturing parameters.

Key words: coal-rock interface, fracturing across layers, dynamic propagation, digital speckle, acoustic emission

中图分类号: TE355
[1] 张胜, 柏巍, 徐鼎平, 郑虹, 江权, 李志伟, 向天兵, . 循环荷载作用下砂岩损伤演化的声发射与电阻率监测及理论研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 53-66.
[2] 宋义敏, 王腾腾, 许海亮, 安栋, 蒋孝东. 岩石变形局部化和破裂前兆的应变信息识别研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 171-182.
[3] 黄曼, 宁昊晟, 洪陈杰, 陶志刚, 刘雨星, 张贺, . 基于第二代负泊松比锚杆加固的充填结构面剪切特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 131-140.
[4] 刘一鸣, 李振, 冯国瑞, 杨鹏, 白锦文, 黄炳雄, 李东, . 循环加卸载下裂隙砂岩声−热响应特征及前兆规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2773-2791.
[5] 雷瑞德, 顾清恒, 胡超, 贺培, 周林森, . 裂隙砂岩声发射信号特征及破裂前兆识别研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2023-2038.
[6] 储超群, 包兴佳, 毛明发, 吴顺川, 崔贺佳, . 深地灰岩三轴压缩声发射特征及破坏形式试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2049-2061.
[7] 吕萌, 王亮清, 谢妮, 朱林锋, 安彩龙, 柯睿, 王旭晨, . 加锚异性结构面剪切特性及声发射响应特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2106-2120.
[8] 马春德, 康子豪, 阳文源, 谭观霜, 赵俊康, . 不同加载速率下花岗岩多期应力记忆方向独立性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1709-1718.
[9] 唐巨鹏, 黄磊, 潘一山, 任凌冉, 张昕, 张众华, . 煤层倾角突变区煤与瓦斯突出模拟试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1719-1730.
[10] 韩世迎, 王航龙, 彭俊, 朱君星, 王林飞, 潘堃, . 结构面影响深埋隧道硬质围岩岩爆特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1765-1776.
[11] 张艳博, 周浩, 梁鹏, 姚旭龙, 陶志刚, 来有邦, . 基于到时精确拾取与智能优化算法结合的岩石声发射定位方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1643-1656.
[12] 王晓敏, 屈钧利, 师亚平. 基于自回归模型方差陡增效应的微震P波到时拾取[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1335-1342.
[13] 许庆钊, 史文豹, 常聚才, 苗壮, 闫澳运, 李传明, 齐潮. 不同加载速率含水煤样力学响应及宏微观破坏机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 881-893.
[14] 于天佑, 蒋关鲁, 饶千竺, 朱丹, 陈虹羽, 刘先峰, . 水汽循环作用下红层泥岩的损伤劣化特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 479-491.
[15] 李利萍, 余泓浩, 李秋雨, 潘一山, . 含水煤块超低摩擦效应试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3093-3103.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!