岩土力学 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (4): 1039-1050.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2023.0560

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

黏聚力随机场波动范围的各向异性对流态性滑坡滑动距离的影响

张卫杰1, 2,张炜2,陈宇3,杜颖2,姬建1, 2,高玉峰1,   

  1. 1. 河海大学 岩土力学与堤坝工程教育部重点实验室,江苏 南京210024;2. 河海大学 土木与交通学院,江苏 南京 210024; 3. 江苏筑森建筑设计有限公司,江苏 常州213022
  • 收稿日期:2023-05-06 接受日期:2023-07-08 出版日期:2024-04-17 发布日期:2024-04-17
  • 作者简介:张卫杰,男,1986年生,博士,青年教授,主要从事岩土数值分析、边坡灾害防治方面的科研与教学工作。E-mail: zhangwj2016@hhu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 52278344,No. 51890912);江苏省优秀青年基金(No. BK20211575)。

Influence of anisotropy of fluctuation scale of cohesion random field on the run-out distance of flow-like landslides

ZHANG Wei-jie1, 2, ZHANG Wei2, CHEN Yu3, DU Ying2, JI Jian1, 2, GAO Yu-feng1, 2   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Geomechanics and Embankment Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210024, China; 2. College of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210024, China; 3. Jiangsu Design of Century Architecture Co., Ltd., Changzhou, Jiangsu 213022, China
  • Received:2023-05-06 Accepted:2023-07-08 Online:2024-04-17 Published:2024-04-17
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52278344, 51890912) and the Excellent Youth Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20211575).

摘要: 流态性滑坡的大变形运动过程受到诸多因素的影响,其中一个重要因素便是岩土体的强度参数。由于现场测试和室内试验的局限性,强度参数往往呈现出明显的空间变异性,同时在不同方向上具有不同的波动范围,即随机场波动范围具有各向异性。针对黏聚力随机场波动范围的各向异性对流态性滑坡滑动距离的影响问题,引入基于乔列斯基分解的中心点法实现了各向异性随机场的离散,采用摩尔-库仑破坏准则和非牛顿流体模型相结合的光滑粒子流体动力学(smoothed particle hydrodynamtcs, SPH)分析方法模拟了流态性滑坡的滑动距离,在蒙特卡洛模拟框架上提出了流态性滑坡的随机分析方法。然后,通过羊宝地滑坡和水平地层模型的模拟,验证了流态性滑坡确定性分析方法和随机场离散方法的适用性。最后,根据汶川地震中王家岩滑坡的地形资料构建了概念性的滑坡分析算例,讨论了黏聚力随机场中各向异性波动范围影响下滑坡运动过程的变化,分析了滑动距离的概率分布规律。结果表明:竖直波动范围的增加会增大滑坡滑动距离的分布范围,使其表现出更强的离散性;在黏聚力参数符合对数正态分布的前提下,滑动距离的分布也符合对数正态分布,说明流态性滑坡滑动距离的概率分布与强度参数的不确定性具有一定的联系。

关键词: 黏聚力, 波动范围, 各向异性, 流态性滑坡, 滑动距离, 光滑粒子流体动力学, 随机分析

Abstract: This study investigates the influence of many factors, specifically the strength parameters of geotechnical materials, on the run-out distance of flow-like landslides. Due to the limitations of field tests and laboratory experiments, strength parameters of soils usually exhibit significant spatial variability with different scales of fluctuation (SOF) in different directions, which is the anisotropy of SOF. Aiming at the influence mechanism of anisotropic SOF of the cohesion random field on the run-out distance of flow-like landslides, this study introduced the mid-point method based on the Cholesky decomposition to generate the anisotropic random field. The smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) analysis method, combined with the Mohr-Coulomb failure criterion and the non-Newtonian fluid model, was used to simulate the sliding process and run-out distance of landslides. A stochastic analysis method for the flow-like landslide motion process was established within Monte Carlo simulation framework. Then, by simulating the Yangbaodi landslide and the horizontal strata model, the applicability of the SPH method and the random field discretization method was validated. Finally, a conceptual landslide case was constructed based on the topographic data of the Wangjiayan landslide that was triggered by the Wenchuan earthquake. The study discussed the movement process under the anisotropic SOF in the random field of cohesion and analyzed the probability distribution characteristics of run-out distances. The results show that an increase in the vertical fluctuation range results in a wider range of variation in run-out distance, and the sliding distances exhibit a discrete nature; on the premise that the cohesion parameter conforms to the lognormal distribution, the distribution of the run-out distance also conforms to the same lognormal distribution, which proves that the run-out distance distribution of flow-like landslides is closely related to the distribution characteristics of inputted parameters.

Key words: cohesion, scale of fluctuation, anisotropy, flow-like landslide, run-out distance, smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH), stochastic analysis

中图分类号: TU 42
[1] 曹苏南, 李春红, 陈远兵, 费康, . 循环荷载作用下砂土−结构物仿生 界面剪切特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 821-832.
[2] 吕志涛, 赵志远, 蔡毅, 夏才初, 段君义. 单向冻融作用下砂岩力学各向异性演化与损伤模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3421-3430.
[3] 董佳斌, 鲁一帆, 金毅, 董文浩, 侯鹏, 刘顺喜, 牛然. 彭水页岩节理面形貌的分形特征及基于节理粗糙度系数的各向异性表征[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3549-3561.
[4] 耿潇威, 陈成, 孙中华, 黎伟, 王勇, 徐梦冰, 余颂, . 基于广义位势理论的考虑组构各向异性的砂土本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3175-3186.
[5] 邓东平, 徐润冬, 彭一航, 文莎莎. 强度空间非均质性与各向异性特征下边坡稳定性极限平衡滑面应力法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 55-72.
[6] 肖劲卿, 温松诚, 郭源, . 基于单孔冲刷测试的黏性土抗侵蚀性及各向异性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 187-198.
[7] 孔洋, 阮怀宁, 汪璋淳, . 模拟柱状节理玄武岩试样的失效模式与各向异性特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 259-266.
[8] 高荡, 彭俊, 王航龙, 王林飞, 彭坤, . 含层理砂岩真三轴条件下力学特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 349-358.
[9] 朱俊宇, 裴利华, 桂跃, . 含有机质土抗剪强度再认识——基于土壤有机质赋存形态的认知[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 451-460.
[10] 王伟, 罗霄, 陈超, 刘世藩, 段雪雷, 朱其志, . 层状岩石不排气三轴压缩力学特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(5): 1334-1342.
[11] 陈丁, 黄文雄, 黄丹. 光滑粒子法中的摩擦接触算法及其在含界面土体变形问题中的应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(3): 885-894.
[12] THENDAR Yoshua, LIM Aswin. 考虑地下连续墙接缝的深基坑RFD系统研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(12): 3717-3727.
[13] 张卫杰, 陈洪鑫, 陈宇, 姬建, . 内摩擦角空间变异性对大型滑坡滑动距离的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(11): 3388-3398.
[14] 周闯, 钱建固, 尹振宇, . 各向异性砂土渗流潜蚀流体动力学-离散元流固耦合分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(1): 302-312.
[15] 罗国立, 张科, 齐飞飞, 朱辉, 张凯, 刘享华, . 基于3D打印的裂隙岩体力学特性尺寸效应及各向异性初探[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 107-116.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!