岩土力学 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (4): 1129-1141.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2023.0545

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

雅鲁藏布江断裂带东段现今地应力测量与断层活动性分析

孙炜锋1, 黄火林2,孙东生1,孟文1,陈群策1   

  1. 1.中国地质科学院地质力学研究所 自然资源部地应力工程技术创新中心,北京 100081; 2.中国电建集团华东勘察设计研究院有限公司,浙江 杭州 311122
  • 收稿日期:2023-05-04 接受日期:2023-09-28 出版日期:2024-04-17 发布日期:2024-04-18
  • 通讯作者: 孙东生,男,1980年生,博士,研究员,主要从事地应力测量、构造分析及非常规油气等方面的研究工作。E-mail:dongshengsun@cags.ac.cn
  • 作者简介:孙炜锋,男,1977年生,博士,高级工程师,主要从事地应力测量、构造应力场分析等方面的研究工作。E-mail:sunwfcn@163.cm
  • 基金资助:
    中国地质调查局地质调查项目(No. DD20242395,No. DD20190319)。

Present in situ stress measurement in the eastern segment of Yarlung Zangbo River fault and fault activity analysis

SUN Wei-feng1, HUANG Huo-lin2, SUN Dong-sheng1, MENG Wen1, CHEN Qun-ce1   

  1. 1. Technology Innovation Center for In-situ Stress, Ministry of Nature Resources, Institute of Geomechanics, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing 100081, China; 2. PowerChina Huadong Engineering Corporation Limited, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 311122, China
  • Received:2023-05-04 Accepted:2023-09-28 Online:2024-04-17 Published:2024-04-18
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Geological Survey Project of China Geological Survey (DD20242395, DD20190319).

摘要: 为获取位于雅鲁藏布江断裂带东段加查县新建水电站工程场区的地应力状态,探讨雅鲁藏布江断裂带东段活动性,采用自主研发的新一代水压致裂地应力测试技术,实测获取了工程场区的地应力状态,并在收集雅鲁藏布江断裂带沿线地应力数据基础上,结合摩尔-库仑破裂准则,对其断层活动性进行了探讨。结果表明:(1)在工程厂区内122.75~418.75 m深度,实测最大水平主应力SH介于6.07~37.62 MPa之间,最小水平主应力Sh介于3.13~20.33 MPa之间,最大水平主应力优势方向为北北东向;(2)主应力关系总体表现为SH>Sh>Sv(Sv为垂向主应力),应力结构有利于逆断层的孕育和活动;(3)实测及收集的大部分数据应力莫尔圆与摩擦系数为0.6的破坏临界线相交,表明整体上雅鲁藏布江断裂带东段发生滑动失稳的风险较高,其中西侧贡嘎至朗县一带风险高于东侧林芝地区。

关键词: 地应力, 水压致裂法, 断层活动性, 雅鲁藏布江断裂, 青藏高原

Abstract: In order to determine the in situ stress state of the newly built hydropower station project in Jiacha county, and understand the activity of the eastern segment of the Yarlung Zangbo River fault zone, we obtained the in situ stress data in the engineering field by using the self-developed deep-hole stress measuring equipment based on the hydraulic fracturing method. We analyzed the fault activity by employing the Mohr-Coulomb failure criterion and the collected in situ stress data along the eastern segment of the Yarlung Zangbo River fault zone. The results showed that: (1) The magnitudes of the maximum horizontal stress SH ranged from 6.07 MPa to 37.62 MPa, the values of the minimum horizontal stress Sh were from 3.13 MPa to 20.33 MPa at the depth from 122.75 m to 418.75 m, and the dominant direction of the measured maximum horizontal principal stress was nearly NNE. (2) The stress regime was mainly characterized by SH>Sh>Sv (Sv is the vertical principal stress), which was prone to reverse faulting. (3) Most of the measured and collected Mohr stress circles intersected the failure threshold line with friction coefficient equal to 0.6, which indicated that the eastern segment of the Yarlung Zangbo River fault zone was in a high level of fault slip instability. Furthermore, the fault slip risk of the west section from Gongga to Langxian was higher than that of the east section near Linzhi along the eastern segment of the Yarlung Zangbo River fault zone.

Key words: in situ stress, hydraulic fracturing method, fault activity, Yarlung Zangbo River fault, Qinghai-Tibet plateau

中图分类号: TU 42
[1] 金解放, 熊慧颖, 肖莜丰, 彭孝旺. 岩石超声波对三维地应力的敏感性及传播衰减特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 183-194.
[2] 林韩祥, 冯雪峰, 张强勇, 段抗, 张修峰, 刘传成, 陈长鹏, 赵钰, . 高位厚硬岩层破断力学机制分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1264-1277.
[3] 韩晓玉, 郑炜烽, 董志宏, 张新辉, . 高水头抽水蓄能电站地应力综合测试及抗劈裂分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 2167-2174.
[4] 张明礼, 雷兵兵, 周凤玺, 侯彦东, 冯微, 周志雄, . 青藏高原降雨增加和气温升高对多年冻土水热动态贡献研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 2140-2152.
[5] 张佳威, 崔臻, 张翔宇, 曹俊, . 高地应力环境下跨活断层隧道抗错断铰接设计试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(11): 3333-3344.
[6] 王锦山, 彭华, . 渤海海峡跨海通道工程区海域三维地应力测试[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(1): 245-256.
[7] 侯奎奎, 吴钦正, 张凤鹏, 彭超, 刘焕新, 刘兴全, . 不同地应力测试方法在三山岛金矿2 005 m 竖井建井区域的应用及其地应力分布规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(4): 1093-1104.
[8] 段淑倩, 高坡, 江权, 周扬一, 徐鼎平. 高地应力卸荷条件下错动带塑性变形 规律与硬化特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(1): 97-109.
[9] 傅鹤林, 安鹏涛, 李凯, 成国文, 李鲒, 余小辉, . 围岩非均质性对隧道突涌水的影响分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(6): 1519-1528.
[10] 蒙伟, 何川, 陈子全, 郭德平, 周子寒, 寇昊, 吴枋胤, . 岭回归在岩体初始地应力场反演中的应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(4): 1156-1169.
[11] 刘泉声, 王栋, 朱元广, 杨战标, 伯音, . 支持向量回归算法在地应力场反演中的应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 319-328.
[12] 侯公羽, 荆浩勇, 梁金平, 谭金鑫, 张永康, 杨希, 谢鑫, . 不同荷载下矩形巷道围岩变形及声发射 特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1818-1828.
[13] 裴书锋, 赵金帅, 于怀昌, 刘国锋, 夏跃林, 张頔, 徐进鹏, . 考虑洞室岩体应力型破坏特征的局部地应力反演方法及应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(12): 4093-4104.
[14] 王川婴, 王益腾, 韩增强, 汪进超, 邹先坚, 胡胜, . 基于钻孔形态分析的地应力测量方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 549-556.
[15] 刘波, 马永君, 盛海龙, 常雅儒, 于俊杰, 贾帅龙, . 白垩系红砂岩冻结融化后的力学性质试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 161-171.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!