岩土力学 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (6): 1675-1685.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2023.1033

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

花岗岩冲击剪切力学行为的试验及数值模拟研究

袁伟1,李建春1, 2,李星1   

  1. 1. 东南大学 土木工程学院,江苏 南京 211189;2. 东南大学 未来地下空间研究院,江苏 南京 211189
  • 收稿日期:2023-07-16 接受日期:2023-10-13 出版日期:2024-06-19 发布日期:2024-06-19
  • 通讯作者: 李建春,女,1971年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事岩石动力学和地下空间开发方面的研究。E-mail: jcli@seu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:袁伟,男,1992年生,博士研究生,主要从事岩石节理的动态力学特性研究。E-mail: yuanw_c@seu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.42220104007,No.42377160);江苏省“双创团队”项目(JSSCTD202140)。

Experimental and numerical study on mechanical behaviors of granite subjected to impact shear force

YUAN Wei1, LI Jian-chun1, 2, LI Xing1   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 211189, China; 2. Institute of Future Underground Space, Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 211189, China
  • Received:2023-07-16 Accepted:2023-10-13 Online:2024-06-19 Published:2024-06-19
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42220104007, 42377160) and the Innovative and Entrepreneurial Team Program of Jiangsu Province, China (JSSCTD202140).

摘要: 为探究动态剪切荷载作用下岩石的力学特性,采用冲击直剪方法,对立方体花岗岩试样进行了不同正应力和冲击速度条件下的动态剪切试验。分析了花岗岩的冲击剪切变形演化过程,讨论了正应力和冲击速度对花岗岩剪切变形和破坏模式的影响。然后,采用颗粒流程序模拟了花岗岩的冲击直剪试验,从细观角度探讨了花岗岩剪切变形破坏的演化机制。结果表明,冲击剪切荷载作用下,试样剪切变形过程中正应力持续变化,剪应力峰值对应的正应力可达到初始值的数倍。得到了回弹型和断裂型两类剪应力−剪切位移曲线,随着初始正应力的增大,峰值剪应力增大,峰值剪切位移和最大剪切位移减小;随着冲击速度的增大,峰值剪应力和最大剪切位移均增大。花岗岩的断裂包含主断裂面和多条翼裂纹,随正应力和冲击速度的增大,花岗岩的轮廓由起伏变得平直,断裂面由粗糙变得平坦,这与断裂后的摩擦滑移有关。花岗岩试样的起裂源于内部,并沿剪切方向扩展至试样边界,起裂方向与剪切面的夹角与接触力集中区的倾角一致。该研究可为岩石的动态剪切力学参数测试提供新的方法参考,也有助于揭示岩石冲击剪切断裂的动力诱灾机制。

关键词: 动态剪切, 花岗岩, 冲击直剪试验, 颗粒流, 剪切断裂

Abstract: To investigate the mechanical properties of rocks under dynamic shear load, experiments were conducted on cubic granite specimens under different normal stresses and impact velocities using the impact-induced direct shear method. The dynamic shear deformation evolution process of granite was analyzed, and the effects of normal stress and impact velocity on shear deformation and failure patterns of granite were discussed. Subsequently, the impact-induced direct shear experiments of granite were simulated using particle flow code. The evolution mechanism of shear deformation and damage was further explored from a microscopic perspective. The results show that the normal stress varies continuously during the shear deformation of the specimen, and the normal stress corresponding to the peak shear stress can reach several times the initial value. Two types of shear stress-shear displacement curves, rebound-type and fracture-type, were obtained. With an increase in initial normal stress, the peak shear stress increases while the peak shear displacement and maximum shear displacement decrease; with an increase in impact velocity, both peak shear stress and maximum shear displacement increase. Fractures in granite specimens contain a main fracture and multiple wing cracks. As normal stress and impact velocity increase, the main fracture profile becomes flat from wavy, and the fracture surface becomes smooth from rough, possibly due to frictional slip. The initiation fracture of granite specimens originates from the interior and then extends to the boundary along the shear direction. The direction of fracture initiation is oblique to the shear direction, consistent with the inclination of the contact force concentration zone. The experimental method used in this study provides a reference for testing dynamic shear mechanical properties, and the findings can help reveal the mechanism of dynamic engineering disasters induced by shear fracture of rocks.

Key words: dynamic shear, granite, impact-induced direct shear experiment, particle flow code, shear fracture

中图分类号: TU458
[1] 彭潇, 周剑, 张路青, 杨志法, 周唐富, 林雅苗, 杨多兴, . 实时高温和自然冷却条件下石英岩热损伤特征对比模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1943-1956.
[2] 高品红, 高晨博, 彭成威, 刘飞禹, . 降雨作用下花岗岩残积土边坡模型试验及离散元分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1632-1642.
[3] 尚召伟, 孔令伟, 鄢俊彪, 高志傲, 王斐, 黎澄生, . 非饱和花岗岩残积土的小应变剪切模量特性与其持水特征曲线确定方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1131-1140.
[4] 薛熠, 杨博鹍, 刘勇, 孙强, 张云, 曹正正, . 液氮循环冷冲击作用下高温花岗岩I型断裂特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 422-436.
[5] 龚囱, 戚燕顺, 缪浩杰, 肖琦, 熊良锋, 曾鹏, 赵奎, . 考虑裂纹分形维数的平行黏结模型细观参数标定的神经网络模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 327-336.
[6] 周长冰, 闫俊豪, 李小双, . 花岗岩热破裂裂隙动态演化特性数值模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 694-704.
[7] 王贵宾, 刘桓兑, 唐明豪, 杨春和, 陈世万, . 复杂应力路径下的花岗岩洞室开挖损伤区研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2539-2553.
[8] 王智德, 钱梦凡, 李杰, 司莹莹, 江俐敏, . 高应变率冲击荷载下节理花岗岩损伤机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 1917-1928.
[9] 王智德, 司莹莹, 李杰, 钱梦凡, 安佳兴, . 低应变率冲击荷载下节理花岗岩的动力响应规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1755-1762.
[10] 王磊, 商瑞豪, 刘怀谦, 陈礼鹏, 张宇, 王安铖, 张帅, 刘化强, . 荷载作用下多裂隙煤体力学特性与起裂角研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(3): 659-673.
[11] 刘新荣, 张吉禄, 周小涵, 刘煜宇, 刘瀚之, . 考虑轴向应力作用的贯通裂隙岩体变形及渗流特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(12): 3596-3612.
[12] 张塑彪, 张帆, 李康文, 马双泽. 高温对不同粒径花岗岩剪切特性影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(10): 2981-2993.
[13] 彭阳, 高永涛, 王文林, 甫尔卡特, 温建敏, 周喻, . 单侧限压缩煤岩组合体的破裂机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 387-398.
[14] 王洪建, 崔炎宗, 袁广祥, 赵菲, 张翼宇, 黄志全. 基于单轴压缩试验的不同风化程度花岗岩分形特征分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(8): 2249-2265.
[15] 熊超, 黄中伟, 王立超, 史怀忠, 赫文豪, 陈振良, 李根生, . 锥形聚晶金刚石复合片齿破岩特征与机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(8): 2432-2444.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!