岩土力学 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (7): 1895-1905.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2023.1345

• 基础理论与实验研究 •    下一篇

不同垫层下煤矸石桩网复合路基承载特性

邓友生1, 2,姚志刚1, 2,冯爱林1, 2,李龙1, 2,孟丽青1, 2,肇慧玲1, 2   

  1. 1.西安科技大学 桩承结构研究中心,陕西 西安 710054;2.西安科技大学 建筑与土木工程学院,陕西 西安 710054
  • 收稿日期:2023-09-08 接受日期:2023-11-06 出版日期:2024-07-10 发布日期:2024-07-18
  • 通讯作者: 姚志刚,男,1989年生,博士研究生,工程师,主要从事基础工程及工程结构防灾减灾研究工作。E-mail:yaozg0501@126.com
  • 作者简介:邓友生,男,1969年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事基础工程及工程结构防灾减灾研究工作。E-mail:dengys2009@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(No. 51878554,No. 41672308);陕西省自然科学基础研究计划重点项目(No. 2018JZ5012)。

Bearing characteristics of coal gangue pile-net composite embankment with different cushion layers

DENG You-sheng1, 2, YAO Zhi-gang1, 2, FENG Ai-lin1, 2, LI Long1, 2, MENG Li-qing1, 2, ZHAO Hui-ling1, 2   

  1. 1. Pile-supported Structures Research & Test Center, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710054, China; 2. School of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710054, China
  • Received:2023-09-08 Accepted:2023-11-06 Online:2024-07-10 Published:2024-07-18
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51878554,41672308) and the Key Projects of Shaanxi Natural Science Basic Research Program (2018JZ5012).

摘要: 为综合利用固体废弃物煤矸石,将其取代部分传统细骨料制备煤矸石混凝土桩。开展了土工格栅和土工格室加筋垫层下煤矸石桩网复合路基室内模型试验,分析路堤顶面荷载-沉降关系、加筋垫层传荷能力和桩身应力的差异性。同时,建立有限元计算模型,研究不同加筋材料应力和变形规律,揭示土工格室应用于加筋垫层作用机制。结果表明:在本次试验中,同土工格栅相比,土工格室加筋垫层显著减小路堤顶面沉降约29.71%。土工格室加筋垫层下桩顶和桩间处土压力衰减量分别约61.51%、56.35%,充分发挥了筏板效应和应力扩散效应。采用土工格室加筋垫层,路堤荷载能够被有效传递至煤矸石桩体,在路基中心处和沿路基横断方向桩身应力极值分别采用土工格栅加筋垫层的1.78、1.80倍。土工格室和土工格栅应力分布规律分别呈“V”型和“U”型变化特征,且土工格室的应力最大值大于土工格栅。土工格室特有的蜂窝状结构对路堤填料产生侧向环箍和肋条摩阻力作用,通过自身张拉变形有效地扩散路堤荷载。

关键词: 桩网复合路基, 煤矸石桩, 土工格室, 加筋垫层荷载传递, 桩身应力

Abstract: In order to comprehensively utilize solid waste coal gangue, coal gangue concrete piles were prepared by replacing part of traditional fine aggregate. Laboratory model tests of coal gangue pile-net composite embankments under reinforced cushions of geocells and geogrids were conducted to analyze the differences in load-settlement relationships of the embankment top surface, load transfer capabilities of the reinforced cushions, and stress distributions within the piles. Additionally, a finite element calculation model was established to investigate the stress and deformation patterns of different reinforcing materials, revealing the mechanism of geocells applied in reinforced cushions. The results indicate that, in this test, compared to geogrids, the geocell reinforced cushion significantly reduced the settlement of the embankment top by approximately 29.71%. Under the geocell reinforced cushion, the attenuation of soil pressure at the top of the piles and between piles was approximately 61.51% and 56.35%, respectively, fully utilizing the raft effect and stress diffusion effect. When using a geocell reinforced bedding, the embankment load was more effectively transferred to the coal gangue piles, with the extreme values of pile stress at the center of the roadbed and along the cross-section of the roadbed being 1.78 and 1.80 times greater, respectively, than those using geogrid reinforced bedding. The stress distributions of geocells and geogrids exhibited "V"-shaped and "U"-shaped patterns, respectively, and the maximum stress value of geocells was greater than that of geogrids. The unique honeycomb structure of the geocell exerts lateral hoop and rib friction resistance on the embankment fill, effectively diffusing the embankment load through its own tension and deformation.

Key words: pile-net composite embankment, coal gangue pile, geocell, load transfer of reinforced cushion, pile stress

中图分类号: TU 472
[1] 赵阳, 卢正, 颜廷舟, 李剑, 唐楚轩, 邱煜, 姚海林, . 土工格室加筋路基振动压实行为及预应力效应[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 771-782.
[2] 何杰, 郭端伟, 宋德新, 刘孟鑫, 张磊, 文奇峰, . 循环荷载下楔形劲芯水泥土复合桩工作特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(5): 1353-1362.
[3] 屈畅姿, 李梦竹, 刘泽, 魏丽敏, 周详详, 曹峥, . 土工格室加筋土挡墙静载模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(12): 3424-3434.
[4] 王炳龙,梅 祯,肖军华. 土工格室补强路基整治路基病害的试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 325-332.
[5] 梁 程,徐 超, . 土工格室加筋土垫层路堤临界高度研究[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2984-2990.
[6] 高 昂,张孟喜,刘 芳,梁 勇,. 分级循环荷载下土工格室加筋路堤模型试验研究[J]. , 2016, 37(8): 2213-2221.
[7] 高 昂,张孟喜,朱华超,姜圣卫,. 循环荷载及静载下土工格室加筋路堤模型试验研究[J]. , 2016, 37(7): 1921-1928.
[8] 刘方成,陈巨龙,王海东,任东滨,陈 璐,. 一种大型循环单剪试验装置研究[J]. , 2016, 37(11): 3336-3346.
[9] 寇海磊 ,张明义,. 基于桩身应力测试的静压PHC管桩贯入机制[J]. , 2014, 35(5): 1295-1302.
[10] 张忠苗,谢志专,赵玉勃,李慧明. 高临界循环荷载水平下钻孔桩的抗拔性状分析[J]. , 2012, 33(2): 343-348.
[11] 王广月,韩 燕,王杏花. 降雨条件下土工格室柔性护坡的稳定性分析[J]. , 2012, 33(10): 3020-3024.
[12] 宋 飞 ,许伟强 ,张鲁渝 ,蓬永刚. 土工格室柔性挡墙变形规律数值模拟研究[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 738-0744.
[13] 赵明华,张 玲,曹文贵,马缤辉. 基于弹性地基梁理论的土工格室加筋体变形分析[J]. , 2009, 30(12): 3695-3699.
[14] 刘 炜 ,汪益敏 ,陈页开 ,周 刚 ,余继东 ,黄放军 . 土工格室加筋土的大尺寸直剪试验研究[J]. , 2008, 29(11): 3133-3138.
[15] 张福海,俞仲泉. 平面应变条件下土工格室加筋垫层的变形分析[J]. , 2005, 26(S1): 241-243.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!