岩土力学 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (8): 2411-2420.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2023.1503

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

软黏土大直径单桩水平循环加载离心机模型试验

高鲁超1, 2,戴国亮3,张继生2,万志辉4,姚中原1,王洋5   

  1. 1. 华能国际电力江苏能源开发有限公司清洁能源分公司,江苏 南京 210003;2. 河海大学 海岸灾害及防护教育部重点实验室,江苏 南京 210098;3. 东南大学 土木工程学院,江苏 南京 211189;4. 南京工业大学 交通运输工程学院,江苏 南京 211816; 5. 山东理工大学 建筑工程与空间信息学院,山东 淄博 255000
  • 收稿日期:2023-10-08 接受日期:2023-11-30 出版日期:2024-08-10 发布日期:2024-08-12
  • 作者简介:高鲁超,男,1989年生,博士,工程师,主要从事海洋岩土及桩基础方面的研究工作。E-mail:gaolc1202@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 52078128,No. 52008100);海岸灾害及防护教育部重点实验室(河海大学)开放基金(No. 202303);中国博士后科学基金(No. 2022M723534)

Centrifugal model tests on lateral cyclic loading behavior of large-diameter monopiles in soft clay

GAO Lu-chao1, 2, DAI Guo-liang3, ZHANG Ji-sheng2, WAN Zhi-hui4, YAO Zhong-yuan1, WANG Yang5   

  1. 1. Clean Energy Branch, Huaneng International Power Jiangsu Energy Development Co., Ltd., Nanjing, Jiangsu 210003, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Coastal Disaster and Protection, Hohai University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210098, China; 3. School of Civil Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 211189, China; 4. School of Transportation Engineering, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 211816, China; 5. School of Civil Engineering and Geomatics, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo, Shandong 255000, China
  • Received:2023-10-08 Accepted:2023-11-30 Online:2024-08-10 Published:2024-08-12
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52078128, 52008100), the Open Fund of Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Coastal Disaster and Protection, Hohai University (202303) and the Postdoctoral Science Foundation of China (2022M723534).

摘要: 为研究软黏土中大直径单桩水平循环受荷响应,开展了不同循环加载形式(单向和双向)下软黏土中大直径单桩离心模型试验,对比分析了大直径单桩变形特性、刚度弱化、桩身弯矩、循环p-y曲线以及桩周孔隙水压力变化规律。试验结果表明:单桩荷载-位移曲线表现出明显的非线性滞回耗能与位移累积特性,相比单向循环,双向循环引起桩顶产生较大的累积位移,累积位移与循环次数和加载幅值有关;桩顶累积位移由可恢复的弹性变形和不可恢复的塑性变形组成,塑性变形与循环次数和加载应力水平有关;双向循环荷载造成桩顶刚度弱化明显,引起桩身产生更大的弯曲效应;桩周孔压累积与循环次数和加载幅值有关,双向循环下桩周孔压累积更为显著。

关键词: 海上风电, 桩基础, 循环荷载, 软黏土, 离心机试验

Abstract: To study the lateral cyclic loading response of large-diameter monopiles in soft clay, the centrifugal model tests of large-diameter monopiles in soft clay under different cyclic loading forms (one-way and two-way) were carried out. The deformation characteristics of large-diameter monopiles, stiffness weakening, bending moment, cyclic p-y curves and excess pore-water pressure were relatively analyzed. The test results show that the load-displacement curves show obvious nonlinear retardation energy consumption and displacement accumulation properties. Compared with the one-way cycle loading, the two-way cycle loading causes a significant cumulative displacement, which is influenced by both the number of cycles and the loading amplitude. The cumulative displacement consists of recoverable elastic deformation and unrecoverable plastic deformation, which is related to the number of cycles and loading stress level. The two-way cycle loading causes the weakening of pile-top stiffness, thereby enhancing the bending effect of the pile. The accumulation of excess pore-water pressure is related to the cycle number and loading amplitude, with a more pronounced effect observed under two-way loading conditions.

Key words: offshore wind turbines, pile foundation, cyclic loading, soft clay, centrifuge test

中图分类号: TU 470
[1] 杨明辉, 蔡明辉, 陈波, 杨汉, . 考虑波致海床动态响应的单桩水平阻抗计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1563-1572.
[2] 周光远, 干飞, 郑刚, 周海祚, 王宏, 毕靖, 刘彪, 张元胤, . 基于土体变形的端承桩负摩阻力计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 930-942.
[3] 曹苏南, 李春红, 陈远兵, 费康, . 循环荷载作用下砂土−结构物仿生 界面剪切特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 821-832.
[4] 刘润, 许泽伟, 陈广思, 梁超. 饱和软黏土中回型沉垫基础竖向承载特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 381-388.
[5] 娄旭龙, 张泽瑞, 孔德琼, 陈星潮, 朱斌, . 深海重型管道管土相互作用大变形极限分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3234-3242.
[6] 田雷, 谢强, 段军, 陶富涛, 班宇鑫, 傅翔, 晏彬淇, . 三向斜锚短桩基础拉拔荷载作用下桩锚节点的受力特性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 278-288.
[7] 吴鹏, 陈健, 付晓东, 黄珏皓, . 循环荷载作用下干燥与饱和泥质粉砂岩变形特性及其能量演化规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 195-207.
[8] 王立安, 余云燕, 任新, 陈辉, . 循环荷载作用下分数阶饱和黏土地基的动力固结分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2279-2289.
[9] 张思宇, 李兆焱, 袁晓铭, . 国内外静力触探液化判别方法对比检验[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(5): 1517-1526.
[10] 李绍毅. 采用有限元+边界元方法研究非饱和地基中群桩基础的动力阻抗[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(3): 895-907.
[11] 杨阳, 王乐, 马建华, 童晨曦, 张春会, 王智超, 田英辉, . 考虑颗粒破碎影响的钙质砂中海底管道贯入机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(2): 623-632.
[12] 邓世邦, 罗威力. 裹覆隔振层的实心桩纵向振动特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(10): 3081-3094.
[13] 刘杰锋, 李飒, 段贵娟, 王奕霖, . 稳态剪切条件下中国南海软黏土的相态转变特性及流变模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 341-349.
[14] 王宽君, 沈侃敏, 汪明元, 王洪羽, 国振, . 基于孔压静力触探的杭州湾海域软黏土强度解译参数研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 521-532.
[15] 何杰, 郭端伟, 宋德新, 刘孟鑫, 张磊, 文奇峰, . 循环荷载下楔形劲芯水泥土复合桩工作特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(5): 1353-1362.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!