岩土力学 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (S1): 208-216.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2023.1278

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

峰前等剪应力幅值下黏土−混凝土接触面小变形特性分析

李世昌1, 2,李剑1,余飞1,耿赟3,杨奇志3,王江琛3   

  1. 1. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071;2. 中国科学院大学,北京 100049; 3. 中铁大桥勘测设计院集团有限公司武汉分公司,湖北 武汉 430050
  • 收稿日期:2023-08-28 接受日期:2023-10-27 出版日期:2024-09-18 发布日期:2024-09-19
  • 通讯作者: 李剑,男,1983年生,博士,副研究员,主要从事土体相互作用试验及数值模拟的研究。E-mail: lij@whrsm.ac.cn
  • 作者简介:李世昌,男,1994年生,博士,主要从事土−结构接触面试验及数值模拟的研究。E-mail: lishichang17@mails.ucas.ac.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(No.42172308)。

Analysis of small deformation characteristics of the interface between clay and concrete under pre-peak constant shear stress amplitude

LI Shi-chang1, 2, LI Jian1, YU Fei1, GENG Yun3, YANG Qi-zhi3, WANG Jiang-chen3   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; 3. China Railway Major Bridge Reconnaissance & Design Institute Co., Ltd., Wuhan Branch, Wuhan, Hubei 430050, China
  • Received:2023-08-28 Accepted:2023-10-27 Online:2024-09-18 Published:2024-09-19
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the General Project of National Natural Science Foundation (42172308).

摘要: 为了研究黏土−混凝土接触面在峰前切向循环剪切应力控制条件下的变形特性,运用研制的土−结构接触面循环剪切仪,开展了50、100、150、200 kPa共4个法向压力下的黏土−混凝土接触面直接剪切试验,确定了各法向压力下接触面的峰值剪切强度;在每个法向压力下设置了低于峰值强度的2个低剪切应力幅值和3个高剪切应力幅值,开展了黏土−混凝土接触面循环剪切试验。根据试验结果,设置了累积位移、割线刚度、切向塑性功3个指标,分析了各指标随循环圈数的发展规律;对比了同一剪切应力幅值下,法向压力对循环剪切曲线的影响。试验结果表明,低剪切应力幅值下,黏土−混凝土接触面剪切位移−剪切应力曲线表现为弹性;高剪切应力幅值下,黏土−混凝土接触面剪切位移−剪切应力曲线表现为弹塑性,接触面累积位移存在极限值,割线加载刚度和割线卸载刚度逐渐增大并趋于一致,切向塑性功逐渐减小并趋于0;法向压力对接触面循环剪切曲线的影响主要体现在第1圈循环时。相关研究成果可服务于土−敏感结构接触面峰前阶段循环剪切的变形分析,亦可为低剪切应力下土−结构接触面循环剪切本构的建立提供试验依据。

关键词: 黏土-混凝土接触面, 小变形, 循环剪切, 敏感结构

Abstract: In order to investigate the deformation characteristics of the clay-concrete interface under pre-peak tangential cyclic shear stress conditions, a specially developed soil-structure interface cyclic shear apparatus was utilized. Initially, direct shear tests were conducted on the clay-concrete interface under four normal pressures: 50, 100, 150 kPa, and 200 kPa. These tests determined the peak shear stress of the interface under each normal pressure. Subsequently, two shear stress amplitudes below and three shear stress amplitudes above the peak shear stress were set under each normal pressure, and cyclic shear tests of the clay-concrete interface were performed. Based on the experimental outcomes, three key indicators were established: cumulative displacement, secant stiffness and tangential plastic work. The evolution of these indicators with increasing cycles was analyzed, and a comparison was made to assess the impact of normal pressure on the cyclic shear curve at a constant shear stress amplitude. The experimental findings reveal that under low shear stress amplitudes, the shear displacement-shear stress curve of the clay-concrete interface demonstrates elastic behavior. Conversely, under high shear stress amplitudes, the curve exhibits elastoplastic characteristics. Specifically, there exists a limit value for the cumulative displacement of the interface. Additionally, the secant stiffnesses during loading and unloading gradually increase and converge, while the tangential plastic work progressively diminishes and approaches zero. The influence of normal pressure on the cyclic shear behavior of the interface is predominantly observed during the first cycle. These research findings can contribute to the deformation analysis of cyclic shear at the pre-peak stage of the soil-sensitive structure interface. Furthermore, they provide an experimental foundation for establishing the cyclic shear constitutive model of the soil-structure interface under low shear stress conditions.

Key words: clay-concrete interface, small deformation, cyclic shear, sensitive structures

中图分类号: TU411
[1] 尹敬涵, 盛谦, 崔臻, 张茂础, . 基于多尺寸结构面的循环剪切力学特性及其抗剪强度研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 405-414.
[2] 蒋明杰, 李泽懿, 吉恩跃, 刘宇菠, 梅国雄, . 考虑级配影响的粗粒土−格栅最优网格尺寸试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2565-2572.
[3] 蔚立元, 杨瀚清, 王晓琳, 刘日成, 王蓥森. 循环剪切作用下三维粗糙裂隙非线性渗流特性数值模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(9): 2757-2766.
[4] 秦悠, 杜歆宇, 马维嘉, 吴琪, 陈国兴, . 不同循环应力路径下饱和珊瑚砂超静孔压增长的改进应力模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(6): 1729-1738.
[5] 尹敬涵, 崔臻, 盛谦, 陈健, 张茂础, . 循环荷载作用下岩石劈裂结构面剪切力学特性演化与影响因素研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(1): 109-118.
[6] 孙杰豪, 郭保华, 田世轩, 程坦, . 峰前循环剪切作用下岩石节理剪切力学特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S2): 52-62.
[7] 侯娟, 邢行, 徐东, 陆向前, . 土工膜-土工布界面动力剪切特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(2): 365-376.
[8] 王柳江, 刘斯宏, 赵志杰, 沈超敏, 鲁洋. 土工袋界面动力特性的循环直剪试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(6): 1625-1634.
[9] 刘新荣, 许彬, 周小涵, 谢应坤, 何春梅, 黄俊辉, . 软弱层峰前循环剪切宏细观累积损伤机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(5): 1291-1303.
[10] 芮圣洁, 国振, 王立忠, 周文杰, 李雨杰, . 钙质砂与钢界面循环剪切刚度与阻尼比的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 78-86.
[11] 李书兆, 王忠畅, 贾 旭, 贺林林, . 软黏土中张紧式吸力锚循环承载力简化计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1704-1712.
[12] 许 江, 瞿佳美, 刘义鑫, 彭守建, 王 威, 吴善康, . 循环剪切荷载作用下充填物对结构面 剪切特性影响试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1627-1637.
[13] 刘飞禹,施 静,王 军,蔡袁强,. 三明治形加筋土筋-土界面动力剪切特性[J]. , 2018, 39(6): 1991-1998.
[14] 刘飞禹,王 攀,王 军,蔡袁强,. 颗粒粒径对格栅-土界面静、动力直剪特性的影响[J]. , 2017, 38(1): 150-156.
[15] 刘飞禹,王 攀,王 军,胡秀青,蔡袁强,. 筋-土界面循环剪切刚度和阻尼比的试验研究[J]. , 2016, 37(S1): 159-165.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!