岩土力学 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (S1): 371-381.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2023.0585

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

盾构隧道底部注浆抬升模拟试验研究

黄大维1,刘家璇1,谭满生2,邓翔浩3,黄永亮4,翁友华5,陈升平5   

  1. 1. 华东交通大学 轨道交通基础设施性能监测与保障国家重点实验室,江西 南昌 330013; 2. 中铁第六勘察设计院集团有限公司,天津 300308;3. 江西省交通工程集团有限公司,江西 南昌 330038; 4. 中交一公局集团有限公司,北京 100020;5. 江西赣榕地方铁路开发建设有限公司,江西 南昌 330001
  • 收稿日期:2023-05-12 接受日期:2023-07-08 出版日期:2024-09-18 发布日期:2024-09-20
  • 通讯作者: 刘家璇,男,1999年生,博士研究生,主要从事盾构隧道劣损防控与维养的相关研究。E-mail: 24110318@bjtu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:黄大维,男,1984年生,博士, 教授,主要从事地下铁道与岩土工程方面的相关研究。E-mail: gddthdw@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.52378398,No.52078213);江西省主要学科学术和技术带头人领军人才项目(No.20232BCJ22009)。

Scaled model test on interaction between a shield tunnel and ground

HUANG Da-wei1, LIU Jia-xuan1, TAN Man-sheng2, DENG Xiang-hao3, HUANG Yong-liang4, WENG You-hua5, CHEN Sheng-ping5   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Performance Monitoring and Protecting of Rail Transit Infrastructure, East China Jiaotong University, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330013, China; 2. China Railway Liuyuan Group Co., Ltd., Tianjin 300308, China; 3. Jiangxi Transportation Engineering Group Co., Ltd., Nanchang, Jiangxi 330038, China; 4. CCCC First Highway Engineering Group Co., Ltd., Beijing 100020, China; 5. Jiangxi Ganrong Local Railway Development and Construction Co., Ltd., Nanchang, Jiangxi 330001, China
  • Received:2023-05-12 Accepted:2023-07-08 Online:2024-09-18 Published:2024-09-20
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52378398, 52078213) and the Leading Talent Program for Academic and Technical Leaders in Major Disciplines in Jiangxi Province (20232BCJ22009).

摘要: 针对盾构隧道底部注浆时浆液扩散及隧道周围土压力影响不明的问题,开展了注浆单元体试验及盾构隧道底部注浆抬升模拟试验。注浆单元体试验分析表明:注浆过程浆液呈现劈裂扩散后最终发生了跑浆现象,而在发生跑浆后注浆附加土压力基本不再增加,甚至有所减小。在隧道注浆抬升模型试验注浆过程中,浆液发生了挤密扩散和劈裂扩散等;浆液劈裂扩散的方向具有一定的随机性,随着劈裂扩散浆液在土层中固结,其流动性逐渐降低,最终停止扩散;浆液由挤密扩散转为劈裂扩散后,挤密扩散所形成浆泡的周围土压力显著减小;完成注浆后,因浆液固结收缩,注浆导致的附加土压力将再次减小;模型盾构隧道在底部注浆导致的附加土压力作用下发生了横椭圆变形与纵向挠曲变形,模型盾构隧道与其周围土体形成相互作用的附加荷载。因此在实际施工中,除遵循少量多次的注浆原则外,应提高浆液稠度而避免发生跑浆。

关键词: 盾构隧道, 不均匀沉降, 注浆抬升, 浆液扩散, 隧道变形

Abstract: In response to the issue of unclear influence of slurry diffusion and soil pressure around the tunnel during grouting at the bottom of the shield tunnel, grouting unit tests and simulation tests on grouting uplift at the bottom of the shield tunnel were carried out. The analysis of the grouting unit test reveals that the slurry undergoes splitting and diffusion during grouting, leading to “slurry leakage”. Interestingly, the additional soil pressure from grouting does not increase, and in some cases, it decreases post “slurry leakage”. In the tunnel grouting lifting model test, the slurry experiences compaction diffusion and splitting diffusion with a somewhat random direction. As the splitting and diffusion of slurry solidifies in the soil layer, its fluidity decreases gradually until diffusion ceases. Transitioning from squeezing diffusion to splitting diffusion, the soil pressure around the slurry bubbles decreases significantly. After completing the grouting, the additional soil pressure diminishes due to slurry consolidation and contraction. The model shield tunnel exhibits “transverse elliptical” and longitudinal bending deformations under the additional soil pressure, inducing additional loads interacting with the surrounding soil. Hence, in practical construction, in addition to the “small amount multiple times” grouting principle, enhancing slurry consistency is crucial to prevent “slurry leakage”.

Key words: shield tunnel, differential settlement, grouting lifting, grouting diffusion, tunnel deformation

中图分类号: TU457
[1] 黄大维, 卢文剑, 罗文俊, 余珏, . 盾构隧道同步注浆对砂土地层竖向位移与周围土压力影响试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2837-2846.
[2] 宋利埼, 章敏, 徐筱, 孙静雯, 俞奎, 李昕尧, . 考虑管片接头转动效应的盾构隧道光纤反演分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2483-2494.
[3] 宋牧原, 杨明辉, 陈伟, 卢贤锥, . 基于自注意力-循环神经网络模型的盾构引发的土体沉降预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2613-2625.
[4] 宋伟涛, 张佩, 杜修力, 林庆涛, . 土性对浅埋盾构隧道施工地层响应影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2179-2188.
[5] 黄明华, 钟煜轩, 陆锦斌, 王克平. 基于非连续地基梁模型的基坑开挖诱发下卧盾构隧道变形分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 492-504.
[6] 谢立夫, 关振长, 黄明, 丘华生, 许超. 考虑主动铰接的盾构-地层相互作用模型及求解研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3574-3584.
[7] 真嘉捷, 赖丰文, 黄明, 廖清香, 李爽, 段岳强. 基于时序聚类和在线学习的盾构掘进地层智能识别方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3615-3625.
[8] 王小刚, 杨建平, 陈卫忠, 李慧, . 盾构隧道结构响应特征及接缝刚度分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 485-495.
[9] 张治国, 沃巍, 朱正国, 韩凯航, 孙苗苗, . 考虑衬砌截面协调变形约束的既有隧道受盾构下穿施工影响的Fourier能量变分解[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(5): 1397-1411.
[10] 张治国, 罗杰, 朱正国, PAN Y T, 孙苗苗, . 基于极限分析上限法的地震作用下分层地基 盾构隧道开挖面稳定性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(4): 1201-1213.
[11] 潘秋景, 吴洪涛, 张子龙, 宋克志, . 基于多域物理信息神经网络的复合地层隧道掘进地表沉降预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(2): 539-551.
[12] 黄继辉, 秦世康, 赵昱, 陈景煦, 张浩, . 压气法盾构仓内气压与围岩气−液两相流相互作用模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(12): 3555-3565.
[13] 张小燕, 李吉, 蔡燕燕, 张晋勋, . 航油储罐珊瑚砂地基变形特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(12): 3738-3747.
[14] 李文博, 甘晓露, 刘念武, 吴昊, 谌珊珊. 基于短梁−弹簧模型的盾构隧道施工期上浮变形计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(12): 3755-3767.
[15] 真嘉捷, 赖丰文, 黄明, 李爽, 许凯. 基于LightGBM-Informer的盾构隧道管片上浮长时间序列预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(12): 3791-3801.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!