软土地层盾构地中对接法孔压扰动规律研究

doi:10.16285/j.rsm.2023.1260

岩土力学 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (S1): 535-549.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2023.1260

软土地层盾构地中对接法孔压扰动规律研究

王彪¹，陈星欣¹，尹清锋²，郭力群¹，何明高¹

1. 华侨大学土木工程学院，福建厦门 361021；2. 中建交通建设集团有限公司，北京 100142

收稿日期:2023-08-22 接受日期:2024-01-10 出版日期:2024-09-18 发布日期:2024-09-21
通讯作者: 陈星欣，男，1984年生，博士，教授，主要从事岩土与地下工程方向的研究。E-mail: chenxx@ hqu.edu.cn
作者简介:王彪，男，1999年生，硕士研究生，主要从隧道开挖与稳定性方面研究。E-mail: 577592379@qq.com

Pore water pressure disturbance pattern of shield docking method in soft clay

WANG Biao¹, CHEN Xing-xin¹, YIN Qing-feng², GUO Li-qun¹, HE Ming-gao¹

1. School of Civil Engineering, Huaqiao University, Xiamen, Fujian 361021, China; 2. China construction Communications Construction Group Co. Ltd., Beijing 100142, China

Received:2023-08-22 Accepted:2024-01-10 Online:2024-09-18 Published:2024-09-21

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在软土地层中应用盾构地中对接法能大大缩短长隧道施工周期，但先、后行盾构施工在盾构对接段产生的超静孔隙水压力会影响土体应力状态和地层稳定性。建立软土地层盾构地中对接法的流固耦合模型，在时间方面，分析了盾构地中对接横断面上不同距离的超静孔隙水压力时间分布；在空间方面，分析了先、后行盾构施工引起的超静孔隙水压力纵向分布，以及盾构对接施工过程引起的超静孔隙水压力横断面分布。另外，分析了盾构地中对接施工对孔隙水压力的扰动规律，并进行施工参数分析。结果表明：完成盾构对接时，盾构施工对拱顶扰动范围最大，侧边次之，底部最小；后行盾构施工对开挖面前方的超静孔隙水压力影响范围是先行盾构施工的1.5倍，其值大约为3.4倍的隧道直径；当分层土体的渗透性差异过大时，会出现超静孔隙水压力突变的情况；在盾构地中对接施工过程中，先行盾构施工阶段产生的扰动影响要远大于后行盾构，至对接位置时，先行盾构对拱顶产生的孔压扰动指标是后行盾构的2倍左右；对接点处未进行注浆加固时，建议先、后行盾构在距对接点2D（D为隧道外径）前，将掌子面支护力减小至0.8倍标准掌子面支护力，或在先行盾构到达对接点前进行超前注浆加固，以减小盾构对接施工过程的扰动影响。

关键词: 软土地层, 盾构对接, 超静孔隙水压力, 扰动度

Abstract: The application of shield docking method in soft clay can greatly shorten the construction period of long tunnels, but the excess pore water pressure generated by the first and second shield construction in the shield docking section can affect the soil stress state and formation stability. The fluid-structure coupling model for the shield docking method is established in soft clay. In terms of time, the time distribution of excess pore water pressure at different distances on the shield docking cross-section is analyzed. In terms of space, the longitudinal distribution of excess pore water pressure and the cross-sectional distribution of excess pore water pressure caused by the first and second shield construction are analyzed. In addition, the disturbance law of pore water pressure caused by shield docking construction is analyzed, and the construction parameters are analyzed. The analysis results show that when the shield docking is completed, the disturbance range of shield construction on the top of the arch is the largest, followed by the sides, and the bottom is the smallest. The influence range of excess pore water pressure generated by shield construction in front of the excavation face is 1.5 times that generated by the first shield construction, and its value is approximately 3.4 times the tunnel diameter. When the permeability difference of layered soil is too large, a sudden change in excess pore water pressure will occur. During the shield docking process, the disturbance caused by the first shield construction stage is significantly greater than that caused by the second shield, and the pore pressure disturbance index of the first shield to the arch is about twice that of the second shield at the docking position. When no grouting reinforcement is carried out at the docking position, it is recommended to reduce the supporting force of the tunnel face to 0.8 times the standard supporting force 2D (D represents the outer diameter of the tunnel) away from the docking position for both the first and second shields, or to perform advance grouting reinforcement before the first shield reaches the docking position, in order to reduce the disturbance during the shield docking process.

Key words: soft clay, shield docking, excess pore water pressure, disturbance degree

中图分类号: U455.43

王彪, 陈星欣, 尹清锋, 郭力群, 何明高, . 软土地层盾构地中对接法孔压扰动规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 535-549.

WANG Biao, CHEN Xing-xin, YIN Qing-feng, GUO Li-qun, HE Ming-gao, . Pore water pressure disturbance pattern of shield docking method in soft clay[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(S1): 535-549.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	倪睿思, 肖世国, 吴兵, 梁瑶, . 基于非线性井阻的饱和软弱土无砂增压式真空预压分析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2160-2172.
[2]	雷华阳, 杨洋, 许英刚. 不同埋深条件下盾构施工扰动试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 1-12.
[3]	王晓磊, 刘理腾, 刘润, 刘历波, 董林, 任海. 地震历史对各深度土体抗液化性影响的振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(9): 2657-2666.
[4]	郭景琢, 郑刚, 赵林嵩, 潘军, 张宗俊, 周强, 程雪松, . 多排孔注浆引起土体变形与孔压规律试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(3): 896-907.
[5]	张志伟, 李忠超, 梁荣柱, 于东东, 梁东睿, 王理想, 吴文兵. 软土地层矩形顶管掘进引起地表隆沉变形分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S1): 419-430.
[6]	石荣剑，陈斌，岳丰田，张勇，陆路，. 盾构地中对接冻结加固模型试验（Ⅱ）—— 冻结过程中地层的冻胀效应研究[J]. , 2017, 38(9): 2639-2646.
[7]	刘树佳，白廷辉，廖少明，陈立生，. 软土地区盾构施工参数对土体位移影响的滞后性试验研究[J]. , 2017, 38(3): 857-865.
[8]	石荣剑，岳丰田，张勇，陆路, . 盾构地中对接冻结加固模型试验（Ⅰ） ——冻结过程中地层冻结温度场的分布特征[J]. , 2017, 38(2): 368-376.
[9]	朱瑶宏，夏汉庸，胡志飞，. 软土地层盾构隧道结构整体抬升实践[J]. , 2016, 37(S2): 543-551.
[10]	闫澍旺，李嘉，贾沼霖，孙立强 , . 海洋石油平台超长桩拒锤分析及工程实例[J]. , 2015, 36(S2): 559-564.
[11]	张彤炜，徐海波，邓永锋. 结构性软黏土损伤变量与扰动度的相关性研究[J]. , 2015, 36(4): 958-964.
[12]	杨继红，董金玉，黄志全，马述江，耿运生，. 夯扩挤密碎石桩加固液化砂土地基的动力数值分析[J]. , 2014, 35(S2): 593-599.
[13]	雷华阳，丁小冬，吕乾乾，贾亚芳，王学超,. 不同挤压扰动下黏土的次固结特性研究[J]. , 2013, 34(12): 3353-3358.
[14]	汪优，刘建华，王星华，蔡君君. 软土地层桥梁群桩基础桩土共同作用性状的非线性有限元分析[J]. , 2012, 33(3): 945-951.
[15]	胡向前，焦志斌，李运辉. 打设排水板后饱和软黏土中打桩引起的孔隙水压力分布及消散规律[J]. , 2011, 32(12): 3733-3737.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

软土地层盾构地中对接法孔压扰动规律研究

Pore water pressure disturbance pattern of shield docking method in soft clay

PDF (Chinese)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0