岩土力学 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (1): 266-277.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.0325

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

近接基坑工程有限土体失稳模式研究

张振波1, 2,李秉欣3,杨茜3,刘志春3,刘义4   

  1. 1. 石家庄铁道大学 河北省大型结构健康诊断与控制重点实验室,河北 石家庄 050043;2.石家庄铁道大学 安全工程与应急管理学院,河北 石家庄 050043;3.石家庄铁道大学 土木工程学院,河北 石家庄 050043;4.江苏科技大学 土木工程与建筑学院,江苏 镇江212100
  • 收稿日期:2024-03-18 接受日期:2024-08-05 出版日期:2025-01-10 发布日期:2025-01-04
  • 通讯作者: 杨茜,女,1973年生,博士,教授,硕士生导师,主要从事地下结构等方面的教学和科研工作。E-mail: yangq@stdu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:张振波,男,1990年生,博士,讲师,硕士生导师,主要从事地下工程等方面的教学和科研。E-mail: zhangzb@stdu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划资助项目(No.2023YFC3806701);河北省自然科学基金资助项目(No.E2024210050)。

Instability mode of limited soil in adjacent foundation pit engineering

ZHANG Zhen-bo1, 2, LI Bing-xin3, YANG Qian3, LIU Zhi-chun3, LIU Yi4   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Structural Health Monitoring and Control, Shijiazhuang Tiedao University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050043, China; 2. School of Safety Engineering and Emergency Management, Shijiazhuang Tiedao University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050043, China; 3. School of Civil Engineering, Shijiazhuang Tiedao University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050043, China; 4. School of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu 212100, China
  • Received:2024-03-18 Accepted:2024-08-05 Online:2025-01-10 Published:2025-01-04
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2023YFC3806701) and the Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province (E2024210050).

摘要: 随着城市地铁建设不断发展,基坑紧邻既有地下结构的情况日益增多,然而仍然缺乏对近接基坑工程土体失稳模式的系统研究。针对既有地铁车站近接增建基坑工程,采用数值分析方法研究近接基坑工程对称/非对称有限土体失稳模式,提出不同失稳模式下适用条件,分析内支撑数量、基坑深度、基坑与既有地铁车站空间位置关系等对土体稳定性及滑移面性状的影响规律。研究表明:(1)近接基坑工程非对称和对称有限土体失稳模式分别有3种和6种情况;(2)随着内支撑数量的增加,滑移体范围不断扩大,且起始位置沿围护结构不断下移,有限土体稳定性安全系数逐渐增加;(3)随着基坑深度的增加,滑移体的范围先增大后减小,有限土体稳定性安全系数逐渐减小;(4)针对近接基坑工程非对称滑移面分析,随着既有地铁车站覆土厚度的增加,滑移面在既有地铁车站侧的近接范围逐渐减少且起始位置外移。以上研究可以为既有地铁车站近接增建基坑工程的有限土体土压力的计算、基坑围护结构的设计以及既有地铁车站安全控制措施的选取提供理论依据。

关键词: 基坑工程, 近接增建, 有限土体, 滑移面, 安全系数, 失稳模式

Abstract: The ongoing urban subway construction has led to an increase in foundation pits near existing underground structures. However, there remains a lack of systematic research on the soil instability modes in adjacent foundation pit engineering. This study employs numerical analysis to investigate the instability modes of asymmetric / symmetric limited soil in the adjacent foundation pit project near an existing subway station. It proposes applicable conditions under various instability modes and analyzes the impact of internal support quantity, foundation pit depth, and spatial relationship between the foundation pit and the existing subway station on soil stability and slip surface properties. The research shows that: 1) Adjacent foundation pit engineering exhibits three to six cases of symmetric or asymmetric limited soil instability modes. 2) As the number of internal supports increases, the slip body’s range expands, the starting position shifts downward in the retaining structure and the safety factor of limited soil stability gradually rises. 3) The increase of depth in the foundation pit influences with the sliding body range, initially increasing and then decreasing, leading to a gradual decrease in the safety factor of finite soil stability. 4) Analysis of the asymmetric slip surface in adjacent foundation pit projects indicates that as the overburden soil thickness of the existing subway station increases, the approaching range of the slip surface near the station decreases gradually, and the starting position shifts outward. This research provides a theoretical foundation for calculating limited soil earth pressure, designing foundation pit retaining structures, and selecting safety control measures for existing subway stations.

Key words: foundation pit engineering, adjacent additional construction, limited soil, slip plane, factor of safety, failure mode

中图分类号: TU 470
[1] 熊飞, 刘新荣, 刘文武, 钟祖良, 杨忠平, 王南云, 王浩, 薛熠, . 含深大裂隙陡崖式岩溶山体采动破坏与失稳机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2516-2531.
[2] 江沂键, 李焕焕, 朱大勇, 凌道盛, . 考虑推力线位置的边坡线性规划模型与极限平衡上下限解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1745-1754.
[3] 张昕晔, 刘志伟, 翁效林, 李铉聪, 赵建崇, 刘小光. 上砂下黏复合地层隧道开挖面稳定性及破坏模式研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3637-3648.
[4] 刘志春, 马博, 胡指南, 张振波, 杜孔泽, . 邻近地下结构基坑主动土压力分布规律试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 33-41.
[5] 易顺, 陈健, 潘家军, 王艳丽, 徐晗, 刘春鹏, . 内撑式基坑围护结构水平变形的表征函数研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 568-578.
[6] 肖明清, 徐晨, 崔岚, 盛谦, 陈健, 谢壁婷, 晏庆明. 基于总安全系数法的系统锚杆支护承载能力试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1743-1754.
[7] THENDAR Yoshua, LIM Aswin. 考虑地下连续墙接缝的深基坑RFD系统研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(12): 3717-3727.
[8] 易琪, 孙冠华, 姚院峰, 桂本, 商浩亮, 纪文栋, . 压缩空气储能地下内衬硐库上覆岩体稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(12): 3523-3532.
[9] 周晓敏, 马文著, 张松, 宋宜祥, 刘勇, 和晓楠, . 渗流条件下隧道锚注复合围岩体的解析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 206-220.
[10] 王家全, 陈家明, 林志南, 唐毅, . 基于三角形滑移面的地基松动土压力研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(3): 697-707.
[11] 肖国峰. 改进的岩质凸块的超载储备极限平衡法[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(2): 425-432.
[12] 李雨婷, 陈晓斌, 何鹏鹏, . 砂土中海上锚板抗拔极限状态的可靠度分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(12): 3495-3500.
[13] 张文莲, 孙晓云, 陈勇, 金申熠, . 基于岩体抗压强度折减的边坡稳定性分析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S2): 607-615.
[14] 吴佳明, 陈健, 陈国良, 钟宇, . 基于BIM技术的地铁基坑工程施工仿真模拟方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S1): 553-566.
[15] 周勇, 赵元基, 王正振, . 基于土体强度冗余法的桩锚支护结构 动态稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S1): 641-649.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!