岩土力学 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (1): 315-326.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.0287

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

随机生成粗糙度的岩石-混凝土界面破坏特性研究

曹勇1, 2,余飞1,黄康1, 2,戴张俊1,陈善雄1,张志才3   

  1. 1.中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071; 2.中国科学院大学 北京100049;3.湖北荆荆铁路有限责任公司,湖北 武汉 430000
  • 收稿日期:2024-03-08 接受日期:2024-10-10 出版日期:2025-01-10 发布日期:2025-01-04
  • 通讯作者: 余飞,男,1978年生,博士,副研究员,主要从事高速铁路灾变机制与调控技术研究。E-mail: yufei8720@163.com
  • 作者简介:曹勇,男,2000年生,硕士研究生,主要从事岩石和混凝土力学方面研究。E-mail: caoyong221@mails.ucas.ac.cn
  • 基金资助:
    湖北省重点研发计划项目(No.2022BAA036);湖北荆荆铁路有限责任公司科研项目“安全智能感知与大数据诊断技术研究与应用”。

Failure characteristics of rock-concrete interface with randomly generated roughness

CAO Yong1, 2, YU Fei1, HUANG Kang1, 2, DAI Zhang-jun1, CHEN Shan-xiong1, ZHANG Zhi-cai3   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; 3. Hubei Jingjing Railway Co., Ltd., Wuhan, Hubei 430000, China
  • Received:2024-03-08 Accepted:2024-10-10 Online:2025-01-10 Published:2025-01-04
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Key Research and Development Program of Hubei Province (2022BAA036) and Hubei Jingjing Railway Co., Ltd. Research Project: “Research and Application of Safety Intelligent Perception and Big Data Diagnosis Technology”.

摘要: 岩石-混凝土界面是工程结构的薄弱环节,对结构整体的强度和稳定性有重要影响。为反映岩-混界面天然粗糙状态,基于内聚力模型(cohesive zone model,简称CZM),建立了具有随机生成粗糙界面的岩石-混凝土复合巴西圆盘试件数值模型,通过不同加载角度下的巴西劈裂物理试验验证了该方法的可靠性,并探究了界面粗糙度、加载角度对试件峰值荷载和破坏特征的影响。结果表明:不同加载角度下,试件存在3种典型破坏模式:界面黏结破坏、复合破坏、双材料拉伸开裂破坏;加载角度对试件力学行为的影响以70°为界,加载角度小于70°时影响显著,大于70°后影响不显著;界面粗糙度的影响随加载角度的不同有较大差异,当加载角度在15°~65°范围内,提高界面粗糙度可显著提高试件峰值荷载,增强岩-混结构的承载能力;界面处应力状态的差异决定了试件破坏模式的不同,但粗糙的界面可以增强混凝土与岩石之间的黏结和互锁效应,对试件破坏模式产生影响。研究结果将加深对岩石-混凝土界面破坏机制的认识,对工程建设具有指导意义。

关键词: 界面粗糙度, 节理粗糙系数, 巴西劈裂, 数字图像相关, 内聚力单元

Abstract: The rock-concrete interface represents a crucial weakness in engineering structures, substantially impacting their overall structural integrity and stability. To accurately capture the natural roughness of the rock-concrete interface, we developed numerical models of rock-concrete composite Brazilian disk specimens, incorporating randomly generated rough interfaces using the cohesive zone model (CZM). The validity of our method was confirmed through Brazilian splitting tests conducted at various loading angles. Additionally, we investigated the impact of interface roughness and loading angle on the peak load and failure modes of the specimens. The results reveal three typical failure patterns under different loading angles: interface debonding, composite failure, and tensile cracking across the interface of both materials. The mechanical behavior of the specimens is significantly influenced by the loading angle below 70°, whereas its impact becomes negligible above this threshold. The effect of interface roughness on the specimens varies with the loading angle. Specifically, within the range of 15° to 65°, an increase in interface roughness significantly enhances the peak load, improving the bearing capacity of the rock-concrete structure. The failure pattern of the specimens is dictated by the differences in stress states at the interface. A rough interface, however, enhances the bonding and interlocking effect between concrete and rock, influencing the failure pattern. These findings offer deeper insights into the failure mechanisms at the rock-concrete interface and provide valuable implications for engineering applications.

Key words: interface roughness, joint roughness coefficient, Brazilian splitting, digital image correlation, cohesive element

中图分类号: TU452
[1] 杜金飞, 杜宇翔, 贾永胜, 孙金山, 姚颖康, 谢全民, 范焜晖, . 水−动力耦合作用下红砂岩变形破坏与能耗分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 248-258.
[2] 张红日, 杨济铭, 徐永福, 肖杰, 韩仲, 汪磊, 林宇亮, . 基于数字图像相关技术的膨胀土三维裂隙扩展特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 309-323.
[3] 张科, 关世豪, 齐飞飞, 徐奕, 金克盛, . 冲刷作用下砂岩宏观力学特性及微观结构[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 1929-1938.
[4] 张朝俊, 吴顺川, 储超群, 庞瑞, . 裂隙砂岩应变场演化与超声时移衰减特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(5): 1284-1296.
[5] 彭阳, 高永涛, 王文林, 甫尔卡特, 温建敏, 周喻, . 单侧限压缩煤岩组合体的破裂机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 387-398.
[6] 高志傲, 孔令伟, 王双娇, 刘炳恒, 芦剑锋, . 平面应变条件下不同裂隙方向原状膨胀土变形破坏性状与剪切带演化特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(9): 2495-2508.
[7] 卢钦武, 关振长, 林林, 吴淑婧, 宋德杰. 基于静力推覆试验的山岭隧道衬砌-地层相互作用机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(8): 2318-2326.
[8] 王磊, 张帅, 刘怀谦, 陈礼鹏, 朱传奇, 李少波, 王安铖, . 冲击荷载下含瓦斯煤能量耗散及损伤破坏规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(7): 1901-1915.
[9] 陈磊, 张广清, 张敏, 曹庾杰, 谌立吉, . 水力裂缝穿越非连续面扩展时的断裂过程研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(1): 159-170.
[10] 徐浩淳, 金爱兵, 赵怡晴, 陈哲, . 热处理砂岩不同接触角巴西劈裂数值模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S2): 588-597.
[11] 邓波, 杨明辉, 王东星, 樊军伟, . 刚性挡墙后非饱和土破坏模式及主动土压力计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(9): 2371-2382.
[12] 彭守建, 张倩文, 许江, 陈奕安, 陈灿灿, 曹琦, 饶豪魁, . 基于三维数字图像相关技术的砂岩渗流-应力 耦合变形局部化特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(5): 1197-1206.
[13] 金爱兵, 王杰, 陈帅军, 李海, . 基于不同粒径分布尾砂的充填体强度及 损伤特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(11): 3083-3093.
[14] 史旦达, 俞快, 毛逸瑶, 原媛, 郝冬雪, 胡伟, . 松砂中双叶片螺旋锚上拔承载 及土体变形特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(11): 3059-3072.
[15] 任义, 高永涛, 吴顺川, 李栋栋, 甘一雄, . 花岗岩巴西劈裂试验的矩张量反演研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(1): 235-245.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!