岩土力学 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (10): 3018-3032.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.1365CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2024.1365

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

新型边坡防护生态基材的力学-植生性能与抗冲刷效果研究

陶高梁1, 2, 3,周恒洁1,肖衡林1, 4,周宏豫1   

  1. 1.湖北工业大学 河湖健康智慧感知与生态修复教育部重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430068; 2.湖北工业大学 环境岩土与河湖生态修复湖北省重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430068; 3.湖北工业大学 生态环境岩土与河湖生态修复学科引智创新示范基地,湖北 武汉 430068; 4.江汉大学 精细爆破全国重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430056
  • 收稿日期:2024-11-04 接受日期:2025-02-10 出版日期:2025-10-11 发布日期:2025-10-10
  • 通讯作者: 肖衡林,男,1977年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事环境岩土工程、生态脆弱区生态修复等方面的研究。E-mail: xiao-henglin@163.com
  • 作者简介:陶高梁,男,1979年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事非饱和土工程性质及边坡生态修复等方面的研究工作。 E-mail: tgl1979@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    湖北省科学技术厅创新群体项目(No.2025AFA020);国家自然科学基金联合基金(No.U22A20232);湖北省教育厅优秀中青年科技创新团队(No.T2024006);河湖健康感知与生态修复教育部重点实验室开放基金(No.HGKFZ07);河湖生态修复与生态环境岩土工程创新示范基地青年学者国际联合研究基金。

Mechanical and vegetative properties and anti-erosion effect of a new ecological slope protection material

TAO Gao-liang1, 2, 3, ZHOU Heng-jie1, XIAO Heng-lin1, 4, ZHOU Hong-yu1   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Intelligent Health Perception and Ecological Restoration of Rivers and Lakes, Ministry of Education, Hubei University of Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430068, China; 2. Hubei Key Laboratory of Environmental Geotechnology and Ecological Remediation for Lake & River, Hubei University of Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430068, China; 3. Innovation Demonstration Base of Ecological Environment, Geotechnical and Ecological Restoration of Rivers and Lakes, Hubei University of Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430068, China; 4. State Key Laboratory of Precision Blasting, Jianghan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430056, China
  • Received:2024-11-04 Accepted:2025-02-10 Online:2025-10-11 Published:2025-10-10
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Innovation Research Group Project of the Hubei Provincial Department of Science and Technology (2025AFA020), the Joint Funds of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (U22A20232), the Hubei Provincial Department of Education's Outstanding Mid-aged and Young Technological Innovation Team (T2024006), the Open Project Funding of Key Laboratory of Intelligent Health Perception and Ecological Restoration of Rivers and Lakes, Ministry of Education (HGKFZ07) and the International Collaborative Research Fund for Young Scholars in the Innovation Demonstration Base of Ecological Environment Geotechnical and Ecological Restoration of Rivers and Lakes.

摘要: 生态护坡兼备边坡安全效益和生态效益,是值得发展和推广的边坡防护型式。生态基材是生态护坡技术核心结构层,须同时具备力学性能和植生能力(力学-植生性能),已有生态基材力学-植生性能有待进一步提升,新型生态基材急需开发。纳米二氧化硅(nano-SiO2,简称NS)和玄武岩纤维(basalt fiber,简称BF)在提高边坡土体力学性能方面表现优异,但对植生效果和抗冲刷性能的研究相对有限。为了解决这些问题,使用2种水泥掺量、4种纳米掺量和3种纤维掺量改良黏土,并通过无侧限抗压强度试验、直剪试验、开裂试验、扫描电子显微镜分析以及植生与抗冲刷试验,探讨其力学和植生与抗冲刷性能。研究结果表明,同时添加NS和BF能有效提升其抗压强度和残余强度,当复合含量为5%水泥+0.9%BF+1.5%NS组合比例时相对提升最大,较普通水泥土提高了133.05%。同时,NS和BF能显著提高水泥土的黏聚力和抗剪强度。水化硅酸钙凝胶(calcium silicate hydrate,简称C-S-H)通过包裹BF,增强了水化产物与BF之间的机械联锁作用,改善了土壤强度、抗裂性和抗侵蚀能力,NS的火山灰反应和成核效应进一步增强了这种效果。此外,复合含量为3%水泥+0.3%BF+1.5%NS和5%水泥+0.9%BF+1.5%NS组合比例的生态基材水泥土的发芽率均大于80%,满足种植需求,植物生长表现良好。在冲刷试验中,抗侵蚀能力提升效果显著,上述两种生态基材在植被的协同作用下,侵蚀率分别仅为10.24%和3.60%。

关键词: 纳米二氧化硅, 玄武岩纤维, 生态基材, 力学性能, 抗开裂性能, 扫描电子显微镜, 生态护坡

Abstract: Ecological slope protection combines the benefits of slope safety and ecological restoration, presenting a promising and promotable method for slope protection. The ecological substrate, as the core structural layer of ecological slope protection technology, must exhibit both mechanical strength and vegetative support (mechanical-vegetative performance). The mechanical-vegetative performance of existing ecological substrates requires further improvement, highlighting the necessity for developing new ecological substrates. Nano-SiO₂ (NS) and basalt fiber (BF) demonstrate excellent performance in enhancing the mechanical properties of slope soil. However, research on their vegetative effects and erosion resistance are relatively limited. To address these issues, this study modified clay using two cement contents, four Nano-SiO₂ contents, and three fiber contents. Mechanical, vegetative, and erosion-resistant properties were investigated through unconfined compressive strength tests, direct shear tests, cracking tests, scanning electron microscopy analysis, as well as vegetative growth and erosion resistance tests. The results indicate that adding NS and BF together effectively enhances compressive and residual strength, with the greatest relative improvement at a combination ratio of 5% cement + 0.9% BF + 1.5% NS, achieving a 133.05% increase compared to ordinary cement soil. Additionally, NS and BF significantly improve the cohesion and shear strength of the cement soil. Calcium silicate hydrate (C-S-H) enhances the mechanical interlocking between hydration products and BF by encapsulating the fibers, thereby improving soil strength, crack resistance, and erosion resistance. The pozzolanic reaction and nucleation effect of NS further amplify this improvement. Furthermore, the ecological substrate cement soils with composite ratios of 3% cement + 0.3% BF + 1.5% NS and 5% cement + 0.9% BF + 1.5% NS both achieve germination rate over 80%, meeting planting requirements with good plant growth performance. In the erosion tests, erosion resistance is significantly enhanced, with erosion rates of only 10.24% and 3.60% under the synergistic effect of vegetation.

Key words: nano-SiO2, basalt fiber, ecological substrates, mechanical properties, crack resistance, scanning electron microscope, ecological slope protection

中图分类号: TU 42
[1] 张春瑞, 纪洪广, 付桢, 张月征, 宋宇, 田竹华, 范文博, . 白云石对粉砂岩物理力学性质影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2661-2675.
[2] 祁凯, 万志辉, 戴国亮, 胡涛, 周峰, 张鹏, . 基于不同注浆材料固化钙质砂的力学性能试验及微观机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1825-1838.
[3] 郑舒文, 刘松玉, 李迪, 童立元, 吴恺, . 膨胀土基泡沫轻质土力学性能试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1455-1465.
[4] 唐先习, 张徐军, 李昊杰, . 钢渣-煤矸石地聚合物固化黄土的力学特性评价与固化原理分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1205-1214.
[5] 杨昊天, 吴红刚, 韦洪, 赖国泉, 尹威江, . 降雨条件下三级桥基岸坡−BFRP锚杆体系的协同变形机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 267-276.
[6] 刘鹏, 曹源兴, 程钰, 白云波, . 碳酸酐酶增强微生物矿化固土效果的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2554-2564.
[7] 徐文彬, 赵康奇, 张亚伦, 刘成保, 周磊, . 调控层胶结充填体三轴压缩力学性能及破坏特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(12): 3658-3667.
[8] 田威, 王肖辉, 云伟, 程续. 基于不同后处理方法的砂型3D打印类岩石试样力学性能研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(5): 1330-1340.
[9] 骆赵刚, 丁选明, 欧强, 蒋春勇, 方华强, . 土工格栅加筋珊瑚砂的强度及变形特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(4): 1053-1064.
[10] 李源, 魏明俐, 刘磊, 威巍, 陈亿军, . 纤维加筋高钙地聚物固化高黏尾砂的 强度特性及机制分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(1): 43-53.
[11] 侯永强, 尹升华, 杨世兴, 张敏哲, 刘洪斌, . 动态荷载下胶结充填体力学响应及能量 损伤演化过程研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S1): 145-156.
[12] 李敏, 于禾苗, 杜红普, 曹保宇, 柴寿喜, . 冻融循环对二灰和改性聚乙烯醇 固化盐渍土力学性能的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(2): 489-498.
[13] 蔡光华, 周伊帆, 潘智生, 李江山, . 生石灰激发GGBS固化高含水率香港海相 沉积物的物理力学性质研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(2): 327-336.
[14] 李艳, 程禹翰, 翟越, 魏盛宇, 杨宇冰, 赵瑞峰, 梁文彪, . 高温后花岗岩微观结构演化特性与 动态力学性能研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(12): 3316-3326.
[15] 许健, 武智鹏, 陈辉, . 干湿循环效应下玄武岩纤维加筋黄土 三轴剪切力学行为研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(1): 28-36.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!