岩土力学 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (3): 750-760.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.0527

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

考虑初始级配影响的粗粒土非线性弹性模型研究

张春顺1, 2,林正鸿1,杨典森1, 2,陈嘉瑞1   

  1. 1. 武汉大学 土木建筑工程学院,湖北 武汉 430072;2. 武汉大学 水资源工程与调度全国重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430072
  • 收稿日期:2024-05-03 接受日期:2024-08-05 出版日期:2025-03-10 发布日期:2025-03-10
  • 作者简介:张春顺,男,1983年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,国家高层次海外人才,主要从事颗粒材料力学特性、岩石力学与工程等方面的教学和科研工作。E-mail: ivan.zhang@monash.edu
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(No.52278367);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(No.2042024kf0032)

Nonlinear elastic constitutive model of coarse-grained soils considering the effect of initial grain size distribution

ZHANG Chun-shun1, 2, LIN Zheng-hong1, YANG Dian-sen1, 2, CHEN Jia-rui1   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430072, China; 2. State Key Laboratory of Water Resources Engineering and Management, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430072, China
  • Received:2024-05-03 Accepted:2024-08-05 Online:2025-03-10 Published:2025-03-10
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Nature Science Foundation of China (52278367) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2042024kf0032).

摘要: 大量研究表明,粗粒材料的强度和变形特性受初始颗粒级配(grain size distribution,简称GSD)影响显著。然而,当前关于考虑颗粒初始GSD影响的粗粒材料本构模型的研究尚不多见。通过引入能够反映颗粒破碎难易程度的初始级配指标ϑ,将材料初始GSD和终极GSD相联系,系统地探究并阐明了ϑ对粗粒材料峰值抗剪强度qp和峰值应变εap以及e-p平面临界状态线(critical state line,简称CSL)位置的影响机制。针对ϑ对qpεap影响的研究表明,随着ϑ增加,qp降低;而εap 则随着ϑ的增加而增加。结合上述结论,以沈珠江提出的驼峰型二次曲线模型为基础,建立了考虑初始级配和围压影响的切线杨氏模量;针对ϑ 对CSL位置影响的研究显示,随着ϑ减小,CSL向下移动的同时还会沿逆时针方向旋转。基于此结论,以临界状态土力学为框架,通过引入状态参数,建立了考虑初始级配和围压影响与状态相关的切线泊松比。对一种粗粒材料而言,该模型只用一套模型参数,且模型预测结果与试验结果较为吻合。

关键词: 初始级配, 非线性弹性本构模型, 粗粒土, 应力?应变关系

Abstract: Numerous studies have demonstrated that the strength and deformation characteristics of coarse-grained materials are significantly influenced by the initial particle size distribution (GSD). However, research on constitutive models for coarse-grained materials that consider this influence is still limited. In this study, we introduced an initial GSD index, ϑ, which reflects the ease of particle breakage and links the initial GSD to the ultimate GSD. We systematically investigated and elucidated the mechanism by which ϑ affects the peak shear strength (qp), peak strain (εap), and the position of the critical state line (CSL) on the e-p plane. The results regarding the effect of ϑ on qp and εap indicate that as ϑ increases, qp decreases, whereas εap increases. Based on these findings and the hump-shaped quadratic curve model proposed by Shen Zhujiang, we established a tangent Young’s modulus that considers the effects of initial GSD and confining pressure. The study on the effect of ϑ on the CSL position reveals that a decrease in ϑ leads to a downward shift and a counterclockwise rotation of the CSL. Subsequently, within the framework of critical state soil mechanics (CSSM), we proposed a state-dependent tangent Poisson’s ratio that considers the effects of initial GSD and confining pressure. For a specific type of coarse-grained material, the model only requires a set of model parameters, and the model’s high accuracy is evidenced by the good agreement between the modeling results and the experimental data.

Key words: initial particle size distribution, nonlinear elastic constitutive model, coarse-grained soils, stress-strain behavior

中图分类号: TU411
[1] 徐卫卫, 谢遵党, 傅中志, 米占宽, . 粗粒土真三轴试验南水模型研究及工程应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2559-2572.
[2] 蒋明杰, 李泽懿, 吉恩跃, 刘宇菠, 梅国雄, . 考虑级配影响的粗粒土−格栅最优网格尺寸试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2565-2572.
[3] 张丹, 邱子源, 金伟, 张梓航, 罗玉龙, . 粗粒土渗透及渗透变形试验缩尺方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(1): 164-172.
[4] 崔新壮, 姜鹏, 王艺霖, 金青, 陈璐, . 高摩阻超静定土工格栅在粗粒土夹层中的剪胀作用研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(1): 141-152.
[5] 张建新, 马昌虎, 郎瑞卿, 孙立强, 杨爱武, 李迪, . 带围压冻融循环下滨海重塑软土力学特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(7): 1863-1874.
[6] 赵顺利, 杨之俊, 傅旭东, 方正, . 考虑应变局部化的粗粒料剪切损伤力学机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(1): 31-42.
[7] 张树明, 蒋关鲁, 叶雄威, 蔡俊峰, 袁胜洋, 罗斌, . 基于破损参数简化的二元介质冻结粉 细砂土本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(7): 1854-1864.
[8] 杨爱武, 徐彩丽, 郎瑞卿, 王韬, . 冻融循环作用下城市污泥固化土三维力学 特性及其破坏准则[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(4): 963-975.
[9] 王康宇, 庄妍, 耿雪玉, . 铁路路基粗粒土填料临界动应力试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1865-1873.
[10] 孙增春, 汪成贵, 刘汉龙, 尹振宇, 吴焕然, 肖 杨, . 粗粒土边界面塑性模型及其积分算法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(12): 3957-3967.
[11] 刘红岩. 宏细观缺陷对岩体力学特性及边坡稳定影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 431-439.
[12] 郭万里, 朱俊高, 钱 彬, 张 丹, . 粗粒土的颗粒破碎演化模型及其试验验证[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1023-1029.
[13] 胡田飞, 刘建坤, 王天亮, 岳祖润, . 粉质黏土变形特性的冻融循环效应及其双屈 服面本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 987-997.
[14] 吉恩跃, 陈生水, 傅中志, . 掺砾心墙料拉裂力学特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4777-4782.
[15] 郭万里, 蔡正银, 武颖利, 黄英豪. 粗粒土的颗粒破碎耗能及剪胀方程研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4703-4710.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!